Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

, Volume 39, Issue 11, pp 1275–1281 | Cite as

Correlation between macroscopic morphologic features and malignant potential of colorectal sessile adenomas

  • Mikimasa Ishikawa
  • Ryuichi Mibu
  • Kenjiro Nakamura
  • Masashi Sakai
  • Yoshihiro Oohata
  • Masao Tanaka
Original Contributions


PURPOSE AND METHODS: To clarify malignant potential of colorectal sessile adenomas, we investigated 46 colorectal sessile adenomas surgically resected from 44 patients. Lesions were divided into three types according to their macroscopic morphologic features: nodular-type (19 adenomas), villous-type (7), and creeping-type (20). Clinicopathologic features were investigated and compared among these three types. RESULTS: Frequency of focal carcinoma in the nodular-type, villous-type, and creeping-type adenoma was 37, 29, and 55 percent, respectively. Frequency of submucosal invasion in these three types were 11, 14, and 20 percent, respectively. Irrespective of the type, large lesions (>3 cm) tended to have a higher frequency of submucosal invasion than did smaller ones (60vs.20 percent;P=0.063). Large creeping-type adenomas (>3 cm) had a definitely higher frequency of submucosal invasion than smaller ones (36vs.0 percent;P<0.05). Lymphatic or vascular invasion of carcinoma was present only in the lesion with submucosal invasion: 5 percent in the nodulartype; 14 percent in the villous-type; 20 percent in the creeping-type. Lymph node metastasis was present only in the creeping-type lesion. CONCLUSIONS: The large creeping-type adenomas (>3 cm) have a definitely high frequency of submucosal invasive carcinoma. Endoscopic polypectomy or local resection may be adequate for most sessile adenomas. However, we recommend segmental resection of the colon with regional lymph node dissection for a creeping-type adenoma that is larger than 3 cm because of increased risk of submucosal carcinomatous invasion and lymph node involvement.

Key words

Colonic polyps Colorectal neoplasm Villous adenoma 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Nicholls RJ. Surgical treatment of adenomas. World J Surg 1991;15:20–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Richards WO, Webb WA, Morris SJ,et al. Patient management after endoscopic removal of the cancerous colon adenoma. Ann Surg 1987;205:665–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haggitt RC, Glotzbach RE, Soffer EE, Wruble LD. Prognostic factors in colorectal carcinomas arising in adenomas: implications for lesions removed by endoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology 1985;89:328–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coverlizza S, Risio M, Ferrari A, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Rossini FP. Colorectal adenomas containing invasive carcinoma: pathologic assessment of lymph node metastatic potential. Cancer 1989;64:1937–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nivatvongs S, Rojanasakul A, Reiman HM,et al. The risk of lymph node metastasis in colorectal polyps with invasive adenocarcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:323–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shirai M, Nakamura T, Matsuura A, Ito Y, Kobayashi S. Safer colonoscopic polypectomy with local submucosal injection of hypertonic saline-epinephrine solution. Am J Gastroenterol 1994;89:334–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Karita M, Cantero D, Okita K. Endoscopic diagnosis and resection treatment for flat adenoma with severe dysplasia. Am J Gastroenterol 1993;88:1421–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Milsom JW, Graffner H. Intrarectal ultrasonography in rectal cancer staging and in the evaluation of pelvic disease: clinical uses of intrarectal ultrasound. Ann Surg 1990;212:602–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Glaser F, Schlag P, Herfarth C. Endorectal ultrasonography for the assessment of invasion of rectal tumors and lymph node involvement. Br J Surg 1990;77:883–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beynon J, MacMortensen NJ, Foy DM, Channer JL, Rigby H, Virjee J. Preoperative assessment of mesorectal lymph node involvement in rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1989;76:276–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heintz A, Bue G, Frank K, Kuntz C, Strunck H, Junginger T. Endoluminal ultrasonic examination of sessile polyps and early carcinoma of the rectum. Surg Endosc 1989;3:92–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Satake Y, Fujita R, Kawase S,et al. A case of flower-bedlike tubular adenoma. Stomach Intestine 1979;14:1557–61.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ishikawa T, Ushio K, Sasagawa M,et al. Four cases of colorectal tumors presenting a flat sessile elevated lesion composed of multiple aggregated granules; with particular emphasis on retrospective radiographic study. Stomach Intestine 1986;21:1373–80.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Strekalovsky VP. Results of endoscopic removal of villous tumors of the colon. Endoscopy 1983;15:49–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Christie JP. Colonoscopic excision of large sessile polyps. Am J Gastroenterol 1977;67:430–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ishikawa T, Ushio K, Miyagawa K,et al. Noduleaggregating lesions of colon: radiographic and endoscopic diagnosis and their clinical courses. Stomach Intestine 1992;27:389–98.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fujimori T, Yukawa M, Satonaka K,et al. Clinicopathological study of the creeping tumor and specificity of gene products from results of immunostaining. Stomach Intestine 1992;27:399–407.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tada M, Motizuki F, Ogoshi K,et al. Management of colorectal carpet-like tumors—indication and limitation of endoscopic therapy. Stomach Intestine 1992;27:421–7.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Iwashita A, Yamada Y, Yao T,et al. Clinicopathological study on colorectal flat elevation with conglomerated nodular surface. Stomach Intestine 1992;27:409–19.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Depalma GD, Caiazzo C, Matteo ED, Capalbo G, Catanzano C. Endoscopic treatment of sessile rectal adenomas: comparison of Nd: YAG laser therapy and injection-assisted piecemeal polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1995;41:553–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mikimasa Ishikawa
    • 1
  • Ryuichi Mibu
    • 1
  • Kenjiro Nakamura
    • 1
  • Masashi Sakai
    • 1
  • Yoshihiro Oohata
    • 1
  • Masao Tanaka
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgery IKyushu University Faculty of MedicineFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations