Skip to main content
Log in

Differentiation of trichophyton rubrum from trichophyton mentagrophytes

  • Published:
Mycopathologia et mycologia applicata Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusions

Of the several morphological and physiological criteria that have been proposed to identifyTrichophyton rubrum andTrichophyton mentagrophytes differentially, only the hair invasion test agrees with the immunological results reported here.

A typical strain ofT. rubrum andT. mentagrophytes was obtained from the Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures (Netherlands) and was used as reference strain. All isolates that did not invade hair shafts (in vitro) and that produced three precipitate lines in agargel diffusion tests against anti-T. rubrum serum (refence strain, Tr-1) were placed in one group. These isolates all also produced a red undersurface pigment and macroconidia with long parallel sides. They were labledT. rubrum.

Other isolates that did invade hair shafts, and produced only two precipitate lines against anti-T. rubrum serum were placed in another group and were labeledT. mentagrophytes. These isolates had variable characteristics of pigment production, colony and conidial morphology.

The antigenic studies thus corroborate the validity of the hair invasion test. The hair invasion test will probably remain in wider use because of its simplicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Ajello, L. &Georg, L. (1957)In vitro hair cultures for differentiating between atypical isolates ofTrichophyton mentagrophytes andTrichophyton rubrum. Mycopathol. Mycol. Appl.8:3–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benedek, T. (1960) Critical survey of the present stand of the production of perfect stage of organs of fructification in dermatophytes. Mycopathol. Mycol. Appl.13:287–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beneke, E. S. (1957) Medical mycology manual. Burgess Publ. Co.

  • Benham, R. W. (1943) Classification of the dermatophytes. Report conference on dermatophytes, Medical Research Committee, National Research Council. November 8, 1943.

  • —— (1948) Effect of nutrition on growth and morphology of the dermatophytes. I. Development of macroconidia inTrichophyton rubrum. Mycologia40:232–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1953) Nutritional studies of the dermatophytes. Effect on growth and morphology, with special reference to the production of macroconidia. Trans. N.Y. Acad. Sci.15:102–106.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bistis, G.N. (1959) Pleomorphism in the dermatophytes. Mycologia51:440–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, B., Labouchére, A., &Schaaf, F. (1925) Versuch einer chemischen Charakterisierung und Reindarstellung des Trichophytins. Arch. Derm. Syph. (Bul.)148:413–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocobo, F. C. &Benham, R. W. (1949) Pigment production in the differentiation ofTrichophyton mentagrophytes andTrichophyton rubrum. Mycologia41:291–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhme, H. &Friedrich, E. (1962) Erfahrungen mit einer einfachen Methode zur Unterscheidung vonTrichophyton rubrum undTrichophyton mentagrophytes. Zbl. Bakt. Hyg.183:541–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, B. &Knight, S. G. (1957) Growth ofTrichophyton mentagrophytes andTrichophyton rubrum in increased carbon dioxide tensions. J. gen. Microbiol.16:642–646.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conant, N. F., Smith, D. E., Baker, R. D., Callaway, J. L. &Martin D. S. (1954) Manual of clinical mycology, W. B. Saunder Co. 2nd Edit.

  • Cruickshank, C. N. D., Trotter, M. D. &Wood, S. R. (1960) Studies on trichophytin sensitivity. J. invest. Derm.35:219–223.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, A. M., Dowding, E. S. &Buller, A. H. R. (1932) Hyphal fusions in dermatophytes. Canad. J. Res.6:1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— &Gregory, P. H. (1934)In situ cultures of dermatophytes. Canad. J. Res.10:373–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvorak, J. (1957) Die Anastomosierungsfähigkeit heterogener Dermatophytenhyphen. Zbl. Bakt., I. Abt.,110:21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgecombe, A. E. (1942)Trichophyton purpureum (Bang) andTrichophyton gypseum (Bodin). Differentation in culture. Arch. Derm. Syph. (Chic).46:651–660

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, C. W. (1932) Pleomorphism and variation in the dermatophytes. Arch. Derm. Syph. (Chic.)25:987–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1934) Dermatophytes. Natural grouping based on the form of the spores and accessory organs. Arch. Derm. Syph. (Chic.)30:337–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, J. G. (1960) Misinterpretation of an agar-gel precipitation pattern. Nature, Lond.188:684–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finger, I. &Heller, C. (1960) Gel diffusion analysis of cross reactions of a protein-hapten conjugate. J. Immun.85:332–336.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Georg, L. K. &Camp, L. B. (1957) Routine nutritional tests for the identification of dermatophytes. J. Bact.74:113–121.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • —— &Maechling, E. H. (1949)Trichophyton mentagrophytes var.nodular. A mutant with brilliant orange-red pigment isolated in nine cases of ringworm of the skin and nails. J. invest. Derm.13:339–350.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hazen, E. L. &Reed, F. C. (1960) Laboratory identification of pathogenic fungi simplified. Chas. C. Thomas, Publ. 2nd Edit.

  • Hejtmanek, M. (1959) E vegetativnim anastomosam mezi hyfami dermatofytu. Acta Univ. Palackinae Olomucensis18:21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hejtmankova-Uhrova, N. (1960) Interessante Chemomorphose beiTrichophyton gypseum Bodin 1902. Naturwissenschaften47:309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huppert, M. (1955) Immunological studies of the dermatophytes. Diss. Abstr.15:1294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, K. &Kuroda, T. (1952) Biological behavior of pathogenic fungi against various remedies. I. Growth of pathogenic fungi in the presence of vitamin K3. Bull. pharm. Res. Inst. Osaka Med. Col.3:46–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kihlberg, G. & Fries, N. (1957) Some experiments with induced mutations inT. mentagrophytes. Svensk. Bot. Tidskr.51:36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landay, M. E. &Dyson, J. E. (1961) Relationship ofTrichophyton mentagrophytes toTrichiphyton rubrum as shown by agar-gel diffusion techniques. Bact. Proc.61:121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, G. M. &Hopper, M. E. (1941) Pigment production by fungi. I. Nutritional requirements. Arch. Derm. Syph. (Chic.)44:453–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, M. G. &Mier, P. D. (1960) Pigments of Trichophyta. J. gen. Microbiol.23:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNall, E. G., Sternberg, T. H., Newcomer, V. D. &Sorensen, L. J. (1961) Chemical and immunological studies on dermatophyte cell wall polysaccharides. J. invest. Derm.36:155–157.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matilla, V. &Peña Yanez, J. (1950) Notas micológicas. III. Género Trichophyton. Caracteres generales y estudio de los especies. Med. colon., Madr.15:489–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nannizzi, A. (1926) Ricerche sui rapporti morfologici e biologici tra Gymnoacaceae Dermatomiceti. Ann. Mycol., Berlin24:1–2, 85–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, B. M. (1959) Hair penetration by dermatophytes with special reference to its use in the diagnosis ofTrichophyton rubrum. Trans. St. John's Hosp. derm. Soc. Lond.42:52–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepys, J., Ridell, R. W. &Clayton, Y. M. (1959) Human precipitins against common pathogenic and non-pathogenic fungi. Nature, Lond.184:1328–1329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, F. &Caroline, L. (1950) The effect of Trimeton maleate on fungus growth and pigment production. Bact. Proc.50:142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, W. J. &McVeigh, I. (1949) The ‘dual phenomenon’ andTrichophyton mentagrophytes. Mycologia41:128–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, W. B. (1945) Serologic relationship among the dermatophytes. Tex. Rep. Biol. Med.3:159–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, M. (1953) Nutritional studies of the dermatophytes. Factors affecting pigment production. Trans. N.Y. Acad. Sci.15:106–110.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taschdjian, C. L. &Muskatblit, E. (1955) Hyphal fusion betweenTrichophyton tonsorans variants as an indication of species relationship. Mycologia47:339–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomomatsu, S. (1961) A serological study of experimental dermatomycoses using an antigen prepared from fungus mechanically disintegrated. III. Cross precipitation reactions among some fungi belonging toTrichophyton, Epidermophyton, andMicrosporum genus. Bul. pharm. Res. Inst., Osaka34:14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanbreuseghem, R. (1949) La culture des dermatophytesin vitro sur des cheveux isolés. Ann. Parasit. hum. comp.24:559–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. (1958) Effect of ultraviolet irradiation on the spores ofTrichophyton sulfureum. A. M. A. Arch. Derm.78:153–156.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, S. (1947) The dual phenomenon in the dermatophytes. Mycologia38:716–724.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dyson, J.E., Landay, M.E. Differentiation of trichophyton rubrum from trichophyton mentagrophytes. Mycopathologia et Mycologia Applicata 20, 81–97 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02054880

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02054880

Keywords

Navigation