Conclusions
Of the several morphological and physiological criteria that have been proposed to identifyTrichophyton rubrum andTrichophyton mentagrophytes differentially, only the hair invasion test agrees with the immunological results reported here.
A typical strain ofT. rubrum andT. mentagrophytes was obtained from the Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures (Netherlands) and was used as reference strain. All isolates that did not invade hair shafts (in vitro) and that produced three precipitate lines in agargel diffusion tests against anti-T. rubrum serum (refence strain, Tr-1) were placed in one group. These isolates all also produced a red undersurface pigment and macroconidia with long parallel sides. They were labledT. rubrum.
Other isolates that did invade hair shafts, and produced only two precipitate lines against anti-T. rubrum serum were placed in another group and were labeledT. mentagrophytes. These isolates had variable characteristics of pigment production, colony and conidial morphology.
The antigenic studies thus corroborate the validity of the hair invasion test. The hair invasion test will probably remain in wider use because of its simplicity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Ajello, L. &Georg, L. (1957)In vitro hair cultures for differentiating between atypical isolates ofTrichophyton mentagrophytes andTrichophyton rubrum. Mycopathol. Mycol. Appl.8:3–17.
Benedek, T. (1960) Critical survey of the present stand of the production of perfect stage of organs of fructification in dermatophytes. Mycopathol. Mycol. Appl.13:287–301.
Beneke, E. S. (1957) Medical mycology manual. Burgess Publ. Co.
Benham, R. W. (1943) Classification of the dermatophytes. Report conference on dermatophytes, Medical Research Committee, National Research Council. November 8, 1943.
—— (1948) Effect of nutrition on growth and morphology of the dermatophytes. I. Development of macroconidia inTrichophyton rubrum. Mycologia40:232–240.
—— (1953) Nutritional studies of the dermatophytes. Effect on growth and morphology, with special reference to the production of macroconidia. Trans. N.Y. Acad. Sci.15:102–106.
Bistis, G.N. (1959) Pleomorphism in the dermatophytes. Mycologia51:440–452.
Bloch, B., Labouchére, A., &Schaaf, F. (1925) Versuch einer chemischen Charakterisierung und Reindarstellung des Trichophytins. Arch. Derm. Syph. (Bul.)148:413–424.
Bocobo, F. C. &Benham, R. W. (1949) Pigment production in the differentiation ofTrichophyton mentagrophytes andTrichophyton rubrum. Mycologia41:291–302.
Böhme, H. &Friedrich, E. (1962) Erfahrungen mit einer einfachen Methode zur Unterscheidung vonTrichophyton rubrum undTrichophyton mentagrophytes. Zbl. Bakt. Hyg.183:541–553.
Chin, B. &Knight, S. G. (1957) Growth ofTrichophyton mentagrophytes andTrichophyton rubrum in increased carbon dioxide tensions. J. gen. Microbiol.16:642–646.
Conant, N. F., Smith, D. E., Baker, R. D., Callaway, J. L. &Martin D. S. (1954) Manual of clinical mycology, W. B. Saunder Co. 2nd Edit.
Cruickshank, C. N. D., Trotter, M. D. &Wood, S. R. (1960) Studies on trichophytin sensitivity. J. invest. Derm.35:219–223.
Davidson, A. M., Dowding, E. S. &Buller, A. H. R. (1932) Hyphal fusions in dermatophytes. Canad. J. Res.6:1–20.
—— &Gregory, P. H. (1934)In situ cultures of dermatophytes. Canad. J. Res.10:373–393.
Dvorak, J. (1957) Die Anastomosierungsfähigkeit heterogener Dermatophytenhyphen. Zbl. Bakt., I. Abt.,110:21–25.
Edgecombe, A. E. (1942)Trichophyton purpureum (Bang) andTrichophyton gypseum (Bodin). Differentation in culture. Arch. Derm. Syph. (Chic).46:651–660
Emmons, C. W. (1932) Pleomorphism and variation in the dermatophytes. Arch. Derm. Syph. (Chic.)25:987–1001.
—— (1934) Dermatophytes. Natural grouping based on the form of the spores and accessory organs. Arch. Derm. Syph. (Chic.)30:337–362.
Feinberg, J. G. (1960) Misinterpretation of an agar-gel precipitation pattern. Nature, Lond.188:684–685.
Finger, I. &Heller, C. (1960) Gel diffusion analysis of cross reactions of a protein-hapten conjugate. J. Immun.85:332–336.
Georg, L. K. &Camp, L. B. (1957) Routine nutritional tests for the identification of dermatophytes. J. Bact.74:113–121.
—— &Maechling, E. H. (1949)Trichophyton mentagrophytes var.nodular. A mutant with brilliant orange-red pigment isolated in nine cases of ringworm of the skin and nails. J. invest. Derm.13:339–350.
Hazen, E. L. &Reed, F. C. (1960) Laboratory identification of pathogenic fungi simplified. Chas. C. Thomas, Publ. 2nd Edit.
Hejtmanek, M. (1959) E vegetativnim anastomosam mezi hyfami dermatofytu. Acta Univ. Palackinae Olomucensis18:21–30.
Hejtmankova-Uhrova, N. (1960) Interessante Chemomorphose beiTrichophyton gypseum Bodin 1902. Naturwissenschaften47:309.
Huppert, M. (1955) Immunological studies of the dermatophytes. Diss. Abstr.15:1294.
Ito, K. &Kuroda, T. (1952) Biological behavior of pathogenic fungi against various remedies. I. Growth of pathogenic fungi in the presence of vitamin K3. Bull. pharm. Res. Inst. Osaka Med. Col.3:46–50.
Kihlberg, G. & Fries, N. (1957) Some experiments with induced mutations inT. mentagrophytes. Svensk. Bot. Tidskr.51:36.
Landay, M. E. &Dyson, J. E. (1961) Relationship ofTrichophyton mentagrophytes toTrichiphyton rubrum as shown by agar-gel diffusion techniques. Bact. Proc.61:121.
Lewis, G. M. &Hopper, M. E. (1941) Pigment production by fungi. I. Nutritional requirements. Arch. Derm. Syph. (Chic.)44:453–462.
McCabe, M. G. &Mier, P. D. (1960) Pigments of Trichophyta. J. gen. Microbiol.23:1–7.
McNall, E. G., Sternberg, T. H., Newcomer, V. D. &Sorensen, L. J. (1961) Chemical and immunological studies on dermatophyte cell wall polysaccharides. J. invest. Derm.36:155–157.
Matilla, V. &Peña Yanez, J. (1950) Notas micológicas. III. Género Trichophyton. Caracteres generales y estudio de los especies. Med. colon., Madr.15:489–505.
Nannizzi, A. (1926) Ricerche sui rapporti morfologici e biologici tra Gymnoacaceae Dermatomiceti. Ann. Mycol., Berlin24:1–2, 85–129.
Partridge, B. M. (1959) Hair penetration by dermatophytes with special reference to its use in the diagnosis ofTrichophyton rubrum. Trans. St. John's Hosp. derm. Soc. Lond.42:52–58.
Pepys, J., Ridell, R. W. &Clayton, Y. M. (1959) Human precipitins against common pathogenic and non-pathogenic fungi. Nature, Lond.184:1328–1329.
Reiss, F. &Caroline, L. (1950) The effect of Trimeton maleate on fungus growth and pigment production. Bact. Proc.50:142.
Robbins, W. J. &McVeigh, I. (1949) The ‘dual phenomenon’ andTrichophyton mentagrophytes. Mycologia41:128–140.
Sharp, W. B. (1945) Serologic relationship among the dermatophytes. Tex. Rep. Biol. Med.3:159–169.
Silva, M. (1953) Nutritional studies of the dermatophytes. Factors affecting pigment production. Trans. N.Y. Acad. Sci.15:106–110.
Taschdjian, C. L. &Muskatblit, E. (1955) Hyphal fusion betweenTrichophyton tonsorans variants as an indication of species relationship. Mycologia47:339–343.
Tomomatsu, S. (1961) A serological study of experimental dermatomycoses using an antigen prepared from fungus mechanically disintegrated. III. Cross precipitation reactions among some fungi belonging toTrichophyton, Epidermophyton, andMicrosporum genus. Bul. pharm. Res. Inst., Osaka34:14–23.
Vanbreuseghem, R. (1949) La culture des dermatophytesin vitro sur des cheveux isolés. Ann. Parasit. hum. comp.24:559–573.
Walker, J. (1958) Effect of ultraviolet irradiation on the spores ofTrichophyton sulfureum. A. M. A. Arch. Derm.78:153–156.
Wilhelm, S. (1947) The dual phenomenon in the dermatophytes. Mycologia38:716–724.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dyson, J.E., Landay, M.E. Differentiation of trichophyton rubrum from trichophyton mentagrophytes. Mycopathologia et Mycologia Applicata 20, 81–97 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02054880
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02054880