Zeitschrift für die gesamte experimentelle Medizin

, Volume 128, Issue 2, pp 140–147 | Cite as

Beobachtungen über den zeitlichen Ablauf der Leberschädigung durch Tetrachlorkohlenstoff bei der Ratte

  • Nepomuk Zöllner
  • Edith Raisich


  1. 1.

    Succinoxidase and succinic dehydrogenase of rat liver homogenates were studied at various intervals after a single intraperitoneal injection of carbon tetrachloride (0,07–0,4 g/100 g animal).

  2. 2.

    The activities of both enzymes show a significant decrease as early as two hours after carbon tetrachloride application, the lowest value being reached after about 10 hours.

  3. 3.

    Restitution of enzyme activity is slow, needing 5 to 6 days.

  4. 4.

    The amount of carbon tetrachloride administered has only an influence on the degree of the changes but not on their time-course.

  5. 5.

    These results are correlated with histologic studies.

  6. 6.

    Some implications of the results are discussed. The rapidity of the enzymatic assay, as compared to histological studies, is pointed out.



Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bruns, F. H., u.J. Neuhaus: Biochem. Z.326, 242 (1955).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Doerr, W., u.V. Becker: Verh. Dtsch. Ges. Path.35, 222 (1951).Google Scholar
  3. Himsworth, H. P.: The Liver and its Diseases. Cambridge: Harvard University Press 1947.Google Scholar
  4. Kimpel, E.: Dissertation, Med. Fakultät München 1954.Google Scholar
  5. Knauff, H.-G., u.W. Schramm: Frankf. Z. Path.67, 308 (1956).Google Scholar
  6. Potter, V. R.: In:Umbreit, W. W., R. H.Burris u. J. F.Stauffer: Manometric Techniques and Tissue Metabolism, Minneapolis S. 139, 1949.Google Scholar
  7. Randerath, E., u.P. Lutz: Frankf. Z. Path.67, 38 (1955).Google Scholar
  8. Richter, M.: J. Pharmacol. Exper. Therap.102, 94 (1951).Google Scholar
  9. Slater, E. C.: Structurally-bound enzymes. In: Biologie und Wirkung der Fermente. Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg 1953.Google Scholar
  10. Stowell, R. E., u.C. S. Lee: Arch. Path.50, 519 (1950).Google Scholar
  11. Tsuboi, K. K., u.R. E. Stowell: Cancer Res.11, 221 (1951).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Villela, G. G., u.E. Mitidieri: Nature175, 208 (1955).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. —: Rev. brasil. biol.15, 285 (1955).Google Scholar
  14. Wahi, P. N., H. D. Tandon u.T. P. Bharadwaj: Acta path. microbiol. Scand.37, 315, 305 (1955).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Zöllner, N., u.H. Groebl: Z. physiol. Chem.290, 177 (1952).Google Scholar
  16. Zöllner, N., u.E. Rothemund: Z. physiol. Chem.298, 97 (1954).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1956

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nepomuk Zöllner
    • 1
  • Edith Raisich
    • 1
  1. 1.Medizinischen Poliklinik der Universität MünchenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations