Skip to main content

Laparoscopic appendectomy

A comparison with open appendectomy

Abstract

PURPOSE: As laparoscopy becomes a greater part of a general surgeon's practice, each new application must be analyzed. The purpose of this article is to report a four-year experience with laparoscopic appendectomy, with special attention to complications. METHODS: All patients undergoing appendectomy by members of the General Surgery Department of Columbia Hospital between December 20, 1990, and December 24, 1994, were included (n=434). Medical records were reviewed, and data were analyzed using multiple regression analysis, analysis of variance, and Pearson's chi-squared test. RESULTS: The number of postoperative intra-abdominal abscesses following laparoscopic appendectomy tended to be higher; however, this did not reach statistical significance. Conversely, all other complications combined demonstrated a rate of 4.3 percent for laparoscopic procedures and a rate of 8.5 percent for open procedures. Again this tended toward, but did not reach, statistical significance. Advantage in length of stay was approximately two days, with a mean length of stay for patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy of 3.3 days, whereas that for open appendectomy was 5.7 days. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic appendectomy has significant advantages in terms of patient comfort and length of stay, and its overall complication rate seems to be lower than with open procedures; however, its rate of intra-abdominal abscess may actually be higher. Further study is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Bonanni F, Reed J 3rd, Hartzell G,et al. Laparoscopicversus conventional appendectomy. J Am Coll Surg 1994;179:273–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lujan Mompean JA, Robles Campos R, Parrilla Patricio P, Soria Aledo V, Garcia Ayllon J. Laparoscopicversus open appendicectomy: a prospective assessment. Br J Surg 1994;81:133–5.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Varlet F, Tardieu D, Limonne B, Metafiot H, Chavrier Y. Laparoscopicversus open appendectomy in childrencomparative study of 403 cases. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1994;4:333–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pearl RH, Hale DA, Molloy M, Schutt DC, Jaques DP. Pediatric appendectomy. J Pediatr Surg 1995;30:173–8; Discussion 178–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. DesGroseilliers S, Fortin M, Lokanathan R, Khoury N, Mutch D. Laparoscopic appendectomyversus open appendectomy: retrospective assessment of 200 patients. Can J Surg 1995;38:178–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B. A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Am J Surg 1995;169:208–12; Discussion 212–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. el Ghoneimi A, Valla JS, Limonne B,et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy in children report of 1,379 cases. J Pediatr Surg 1994;29:786–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buckley RC, Hall TJ, Muakkassa FF, Anglin B, Rhodes RS, Scott-Conner CE. Laparoscopic appendectomy: is it worth it? Am Surg 1994;60:30–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tate JJ, Dawson JW, Chung SC, Lau WY, Li AK. Laparoscopicversus open appendicectomy: prospective randomized trial. Lancet 1993;342:633–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schiffino L, Mouro J, Karayel M, Levard H, Berthelot G, Dubois F. Laparoscopic appendectomy: a study of 154 consecutive cases. Int Surg 1993;78:280–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Richards W, Watson D, Lynch G,et al. A review of the results of laparoscopicversus open appendectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993;177:473–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schroder DM, Lathrop JC, Lloyd LR, Boccaccio JE, Hawasli A. Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: is there really any benefit? Am Surg 1993;59:541–7; Discussion 547–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tate JJ, Chung SC. Conventionalversus laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 1993;80:761–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cohen MD, Dangles K. The cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic appendectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 1993;3:93–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Kluiber, R.M., Hartsman, B. Laparoscopic appendectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 39, 1008–1011 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02054691

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02054691

Key words

  • Laparoscopic
  • Appendectomy
  • Abscess
  • Complications