Advertisement

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

, Volume 39, Issue 7, pp 723–729 | Cite as

Anal fistula surgery

Factors associated with recurrence and incontinence
  • Julio Garcia-Aguilar
  • Carlos Belmonte
  • W. Douglas Wong
  • Stanley M. Goldberg
  • Robert D. Madoff
Original Contributions

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to assess results of surgery for fistula-in-ano and identify risk factors for fistula recurrence and impaired continence. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 624 patients who underwent surgery for fistula-in-ano between 1988 and 1992. Follow-up was by mailed questionnaire, with 375 patients (60 percent) responding. Mean follow-up was 29 months. Fistulas were intersphincteric in 180 patients, transsphincteric in 108, suprasphincteric in 6, extrasphincteric in 6, and unclassified in 75. Procedures included fistulotomy and marsupialization (n=300), seton placement (n=63), endorectal advancement flap (n=3), and other (n=9). Factors associated with recurrence and incontinence were analyzed by univariate and multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: The fistula recurred in 31 patients (8 percent), and 45 percent complained of some degree of postoperative incontinence. Factors associated with recurrence included complex type of fistula, horseshoe extension, lack of identification or lateral location of the internal fistulous opening, previous fistula surgery, and the surgeon performing the procedure. Incontinence was associated with female sex, high anal fistula, type of surgery, and previous fistula surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment of fistula-in-ano is associated with a significant risk of recurrence and a high risk of impaired continence. Degree of risk varies with identifiable factors.

Key words

Fistulo-in-ano Fistulotomy Anal fistula Functional results Recurrence Incontinence Seton 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD. A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg 1976;63:1–12.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Garcia-Aguilar J, Rothenberger DA. Anal and perianal infections. In: Howard RJ, Simmons RL, eds. Surgical Infectious Diseases. 3rd ed. Norwalk: Appleton & Lange, 1995.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goldberg SM, Garcia-Aguilar J. The cutting seton. In: Phillips R, Lunniss P, eds. Anal Fistula. London: Chapman & Hall (in press).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stone JM, Goldberg SM. The endorectal advancement flap procedure. Int J Colorectal Dis 1990;5:232–5.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Parks AG, Stitz RW. Symposium: fistula-in-ano. The treatment of high fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 1976;19:487–99.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    van Tets WF, Kuijpers HC. Continence disorders after anal fistulotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1194–7.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khubchandani IT, Reed JF. Sequelae of internal sphincterotomy for chronic fissure in ano. Br J Surg 1989;76:431–4.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reznick RK, Bailey HR. Closure of the internal opening for treatment of complex fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:116–8.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mann CV, Clifton MA. Re-routing of the track for the treatment of high anal and anorectal fistulae. Br J Surg 1985;72:134–7.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oh C. Management of high recurrent anal fistula. Surgery 1983;93:330–2.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aguilar PS, Plasencia G, Hardy TG Jr, Hartmann RF, Stewart WR. Mucosal advancement in the treatment of anal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:496–8.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wedell J, Meier zu Eissen P, Banzhaf G, Kleine L. Sliding flap advancement for the treatment of high level fistulae. Br J Surg 1987;74:390–1.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shemesh EI, Kodner IJ, Fry RD, Neufeld DM. Endorectal sliding flap repair of complicated anterior anoperineal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:22–4.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kodner IJ, Mazor A, Shemesh EI, Fry RD, Fleshman JW, Birnbaum EH. Endorectal advancement flap repair of rectovaginal and other complicated anorectal fistulas. Surgery 1993;114:682–90.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thomson JP, Ross AH. Can the external anal sphincter be preserved in the treatment of trans-sphincteric fistula-in-ano? Int J Colorectal Dis 1989;4:247–50.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kennedy HL, Zegarra JP. Fistulotomy without external sphincter division for high anal fistulae. Br J Surg 1990;77:898–901.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Matos D, Lunniss PJ, Phillips RK. Total sphincter conservation in high fistula-in-ano: results of a new approach. Br J Surg 1993;80:802–4.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Parkash S, Lakshmiratan V, Gajendran V. Fistula-in-ano: treatment by fistulectomy, primary closure and reconstitution. Aust N Z J Surg 1985;55:23–7.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kuypers HC. Use of the seton in the treatment of extrasphincteric anal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:109–10.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ramanujam PS, Prasad ML, Abcarian H. The role of seton in fistulotomy of the anus. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1983;157:419–22.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Williams JG, MacLeod CA, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. Seton treatment of high anal fistulae. Br J Surg 1991;78:1159–61.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pearl RK, Andrews JR, Orsay CP,et al. Role of the seton in the management of anorectal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:573–9.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Culp CE. Use of penrose drains to treat certain anal fistulas: a primary operative seton. Mayo Clin Proc 1984;59:613–7.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Christensen A, Nilas L, Christiansen J. Treatment of transsphincteric anal fistulas by the seton technique. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:454–5.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ustynoski K, Rosen L, Stasik J, Riether R, Sheets J, Khubchandani IT. Horseshoe abscess fistula: seton treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:602–5.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hanley PH. Rubber band seton in the management of abscess-anal fistula. Ann Surg 1978;187:435–7.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Seow-Choen F, Phillips RK. Insights gained from the management of problematical anal fistulae at St. Mark's Hospital, 1984–88. Br J Surg 1991;78:539–41.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cirocco WC, Reilly JC. Challenging the predictive accuracy of Goodsall's rule for anal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:537–42.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartram CI. Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1905–11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julio Garcia-Aguilar
    • 1
  • Carlos Belmonte
    • 1
  • W. Douglas Wong
    • 1
  • Stanley M. Goldberg
    • 1
  • Robert D. Madoff
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of SurgeryUniversity of Minnesota Medical SchoolSt. Paul

Personalised recommendations