Advertisement

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

, Volume 39, Supplement 10, pp S1–S6 | Cite as

Laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease

  • Christopher J. Bruce
  • John A. Coller
  • John J. Murray
  • David J. SchoetzJr.
  • Patricia L. Roberts
  • Lawrence C. Rusin
Original Contributions

Abstract

PURPOSE: The role of laparoscopic surgery in treatment of patients with diverticulitis is unclear. A retrospective comparison of laparoscopic with conventional surgery for patients with chronic diverticulitis was performed to assess morbidity, recovery from surgery, and cost. METHODS: Records of patients undergoing elective resection for uncomplicated diverticulitis from 1992 to 1994 at a single institution were reviewed. Laparoscopic resection involved complete intracorporeal dissection, bowel division, and anastomosis with extracorporeal placement of an anvil. RESULTS: Sigmoid and left colon resections were performed laparoscopically in 25 patients and by open technique in 17 patients by two independent operating teams. No significant differences existed in age, gender, weight, comorbidities, or operations performed. In the laparoscopic group, three operations were converted to open laparotomy (12 percent) because of unclear anatomy. Major complications occurred in two patients who underwent laparoscopic resection, both requiring laparotomy, and in one patient in the conventional surgery group who underwent computed tomographic-guided drainage of an abscess. Patients who underwent laparoscopic resection tolerated a regular diet sooner than patients who underwent conventional surgery (3.2±0.9vs.5.7±1.1 days;P<0.001) and were discharged from the hospital earlier (4.2±1.1vs.6.8±1.1 days;P<0.001). Overall costs were higher in the laparoscopic group than the open surgery group ($10,230±49.1vs.$7,068±37.1;P<0.001) because of a significantly longer total operating room time (397±9.1vs.115±5.1 min;P<0.001). Follow-up studies with a mean of one year revealed two port site infections in the laparoscopic group and one wound infection in the open group. Of patients undergoing conventional resection, one patient experienced a postoperative bowel obstruction that was managed nonoperatively, and, in one patient, an incarcerated incisional hernia developed that required urgent laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic resection in patients with chronic diverticulitis is safe, with faster recovery and shorter hospital stay compared with conventional open surgery. Higher cost of operating room usage time makes the laparoscopic technique difficult to justify economically. Simplification of operating room use and better case selection may improve cost-effectiveness of the laparoscopic approach.

Key words

Laparoscopic colectomy Laparoscopic sigmoid resection Diverticulitis 

References

  1. 1.
    Falk PM, Beart RW Jr, Wexner SD,et al. Laparoscopic colectomy: a critical appraisal. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:28–34.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jager RM. Laparoscopic colectomy: is it evolutionary or revolutionary? In: Jager RM, Wexner SD, eds. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1996:3.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Darzi A, Super P, Guillou PJ, Monson JR. Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: total laparoscopic approach. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:268–71.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lumley JW, Fielding GA, Rhodes M, Nathanson LK, Siu S, Stitz RW. Laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery: lessons learned from 240 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:155–9.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Plasencia G, Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Viamonte M. 3d. Laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid colectomy and low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:829–33.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wexner SD, Cohen SM, Johansen OB, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman DG. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective assessment and current perspective. Br J Surg 1993;80:1602–5.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liberman MA, Phillips EH, Carroll BJ, Fallas M, Rosenthal R. Laparoscopic colectomy vs traditional colectomy for diverticulitis: outcome and costs. Surg Endose 1996;10:15–8.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Phillips EH, Franklin M, Carroll BJ, Fallas MJ, Ramos R, Rosenthal D. Laparoscopic colectomy. Ann Surg 1992;216:703–7.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fine AP, Lanasa S, Gannon MP, Cline CW, James R. Laparoscopic colon surgery: report of a series. Am Surg 1995;61:412–6.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Senagore AJ, Luchtefeld MA, Mackeigan JM, Mazier WP. Open colectomyversus laparoscopic colectomy: are there differences? Am Surg 1993;59:549–54.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lord SA, Larach SW, Ferrara A, Williamson PR, Lago CP, Lube MW. Laparoscopic resections for colorectal carcinoma: a three-year experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:148–54.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher J. Bruce
    • 1
  • John A. Coller
    • 1
  • John J. Murray
    • 1
  • David J. SchoetzJr.
    • 1
  • Patricia L. Roberts
    • 1
  • Lawrence C. Rusin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Colon and Rectal SurgeryLahey Hitchcock Medical CenterBurlington

Personalised recommendations