Advertisement

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

, Volume 34, Issue 5, pp 391–395 | Cite as

Analysis of the colonoscopic findings in patients with rectal bleeding according to the pattern of their presenting symptoms

  • James M. Church
Original Contributions

Abstract

Patients presenting with rectal bleeding were prospectively categorized according to the pattern of their presentation into those with outlet bleeding (n=115), suspicious bleeding (n=59), hemorrhage (n=27), and occult bleeding (n=68). All patients underwent colonoscopy and this was complete in 94 percent. There were 34 patients with carcinoma and 69 with adenomas >1 cm diameter. The percentage of neoplasms proximal to the splenic flexure was 1 percent in outlet bleeding, 24 percent with suspicious bleeding, 75 percent with hemorrhage, and 73 percent with occult bleeding. Barium enema was available in 78 patients and was falsely positive for neoplasms in 21 percent and falsely negative in 45 percent. Colonoscopy is the investigation of choice in patients with suspicious, occult, or severe rectal bleeding. Bleeding of a typical outlet pattern may be investigated by flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Key words

Rectal bleeding Colonoscopy Flexible sigmoidoscopy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Investigation of rectal bleeding (Editorial). Lancet 1989;1:195–7.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shrock TR. Colonoscopic diagnosis and treatment of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Surg Clin North Am 1989;69:1309–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Killingback M. Rectal bleeding. Aust N Z J Surg 1982;52:547–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Macrae FA, St John DJ. Relationship between patterns of bleeding and hemoccult sensitivity in patients with colorectal cancers or adenomas. Gastroenterology 1982;82:891–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dent OF, Goulston KJ, Zubrzycki J, Chapuis PH. Bowel symptoms in an apparently well population. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:243–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chapuis PH, Goulston KJ, Dent OF, Tait AD. Predictive value of rectal bleeding in screening for rectal and sigmoid polyps. Br Med J 1985;290:1546–8.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mant A, Bokey EL, Chapuis PH,et al. Rectal bleeding: do other symptoms aid in diagnosis? Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:191–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cheung PSY, Wong SKC, Boey J, Lai CK. Frank rectal bleeding: a prospective study of causes in patients over the age of 40. Postgrad Med J 1988;64:364–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guillem JG, Forde KA, Treat MR,et al. The impact of colonoscopy on the early detection of colonic neoplasms in patients with rectal bleeding. Ann Surg 1987;206:606–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shinya H, Cwern M, Wolf G. Colonoscopic diagnosis and the management of rectal bleeding. Surg Clin North Am 1982;62:897–903.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Swarbrick ET, Fevre DI, Hunt RH,et al. Colonoscopy for unexplained rectal bleeding. Br Med J 1978;2:1685–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Forde KA, Waye JD. Is there a need to perform full colonoscopy in a middle-aged person with episodic bright red blood per rectum and internal hemorrhoids? Am J Gastroenterol 1989;84:1227–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jaques PF, Fitch DD. Anal verge and low rectal bleeding. J Clin Gastroenterol 1986;8:38–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • James M. Church
    • 1
  1. 1.Colorectal Surgery DepartmentCleveland Clinic FoundationCleveland

Personalised recommendations