Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing functional results one year and ten years after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the treatment of choice for most patients with chronic ulcerative colitis. Long-term results, however remain undefined; the major concern is that function may deteriorate. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess functional outcome in a subgroup of patients who have an IPAA for chronic ulcerative colitis for >10 years. METHODS: Among 1400 IPAA patients, 75 consecutive subjects (31 females and 44 males; median age 31 at operation) were identified who had the procedure prior to 1982. All patients had functional results recorded 1 year and 10 years following ileostomy closure. RESULTS: There were four deaths during the follow-up period; none were pouch related. Two patients refused ileostomy closure. Of the remaining 69 patients, there were 8 (11 percent) failures, leaving 61 subjects available for study. Stool frequency (7±3, mean±SD) remained unchanged. Of the 50 subjects with initially excellent daytime continence, 39 (78 percent) remained the same, 10 (20 percent) developed minor incontinence, and 1 developed poor control after 10 years. Four of 10 subjects (40 percent) with initial minor daytime incontinence remained unchanged, 4 (40 percent) improved, and 2 (20 percent) worsened. The one subject with poor control at one year was unchanged. Nocturnal fecal spotting increased over the 10-year period but not significantly (38 percent vs.52 percent;P=0.08). CONCLUSIONS: After IPAA, functional results in terms of stool frequency and rate of fecal incontinence did not deteriorate with time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Martin LW, LeCoultre C, Schubert WK. Total colectomy and mucosal proctectomy with preservation of continence in ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg 1977;186:477–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Keighley MR, Yoshioka K, Kmiot W. Prospective randomized trial to compare the stapled double lumen pouch and the sutured quadruple pouch for restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 1988;75:1008–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tuckson WB, Fazio VW. Functional comparison between double and triple ileal loop pouches. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:17–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nicholls RJ, Pezim ME. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis: a comparison of three reservoir designs. Br J Surg 1985;72:470–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Utsunomiya J, Iwama T, Imajo M,et al. Total colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileoanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1980;23:459–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pemberton JH, Kelly KA, Beart RW, Dozois RR, Wolff BG, Ilstrup DM. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis: long term results. Ann Surg 1987;206:504–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kohler LW, Pemberton JH, Zinmeister AR, Kelly KA. Quality of life after proctocolectomy. A comparison of Brooke ileostomy, Kock pouch, and ileal pouchanal anastomosis. Gastroenterology 1991;101:679–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gemlo BT, Wong WD, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Patterns of failure. Arch Surg 1992;127:784–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Keighley MR, Winslet MC, Flinn R, Kmiot W. Multivariate analysis of factors influencing the results of restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 1989;76:740–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wexner SD, Jensen L, Rothenberger DA, Wong WD, Goldberg SM. Long-term functional analysis of the ileoanal reservoir. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:275–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dozois RR, Kelly KA, Welling DR,et al. Ileal pouchanal anastomosis: comparison of results in familial adenomatous polyposis and chronic ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg 1989;210:268–73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Madden MJ, Farthing MJ, Nicholls RJ. Inflammation in ileal reservoirs: “pouchitis.” Gut 1990;31:247–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zuccaro G Jr, Fazio VW, Church JM,et al. Pouch ileitis. Dig Dis Sci 1989;34:1505–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Salemans JM, Nagengast FM, Lubbers EJ, Kuijpers JH. Postoperative and long-term results of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis coli. Dig Dis Sci 1992;37:1882–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnston D, Holdsworth PJ, Nasmyth DG,et al. Preservation of the entire anal canal in conservative proctocolectomy without mucosal resection with mucosal proctectomy and endoanal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1987;74:940–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Seow-Choen, Tsunoda A, Nicholls RJ. Prospective randomized trial comparing anal function after hand sewn ileoanal anastomosis with mucosectomy versus stapled ileoanal anastomosis without mucosectomy in restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 1991;78:430–4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois, May 2 to 7, 1993.

About this article

Cite this article

McIntyre, P.B., Pemberton, J.H., Wolff, B.G. et al. Comparing functional results one year and ten years after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 37, 303–307 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02053588

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02053588

Key words

Navigation