Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does methodic long-term follow-up affect survival after curative resection of colorectal carcinoma?

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Records of 487 patients in long-term follow-up after R0 resection of colorectal carcinomas between January 1, 1980 and December 31, 1989 were analyzed. Every patient underwent regular examinations according to a defined schedule after curative resection of colorectal carcinoma. The date of evaluation was June 31, 1991. During a median observation time of 48 months (range, 15–132 months), tumor recurrence was observed in 149 patients (30.6 percent), with 56.4 percent of these suffering from tumor-associated symptoms. As the primary manifestation of tumor recurrence, only distant metastases (DM) were found in 76 patients (51 percent), only local recurrence (LR) in 46 patients (30.9 percent), and both DM and LR in 27 patients (18.1 percent). Patients with rectal carcinoma developed LR more frequently (P <0.05) (19.5 percent) than patients with colon carcinoma (11.8 percent). The probability of developing distant metastases was not different (P <0.05) for colon or rectal carcinoma but depended on primary tumor stage (P <0.05). Only 36 patients (24.2 percent) with recurrence could undergo further curative resection. Fifty patients (33.5 percent) were given palliative therapy, and 63 patients (42.3 percent) were given no oncologic treatment. Only 9 of the 36 patients (6 percent of all recurrence patients) undergoing R0 resection were free of tumor for more than two years. In no case was a third R0 resection possible. The survival time of these patients was increased significantly after R0 resection of tumor recurrence (P =0.03). Our study suggests that only a very few patients may live longer as a result of regular follow-up programs after curative resection for colorectal carcinoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Langevin JM, Wong DW. What is appropriate follow-up for the patient with colorectal cancer? Can J Surg 1985;28:424–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fritsch A, Herbst F, Schiessel R. Das lokalrezidiv nach kolorektalem karzinom. Wien Med Wochenschr 1988;13:313–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mentges B, Brueckner R. Prognostische kriterien und risikogruppen beim kolorektalen karzinom. Wien Med Wochenschr 1988;13:317–22.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stock W, ed. Nachsorge beim kolorektalen karzinom. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Metzger U, Bronz K, Bühler H,et al. Die prospektive nachsorgestudie radikal operierter kolorektaler karzinome. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1985;115: 1001–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Enker WE, Kramer RG. The follow-up of patients after definitive resections for large bowel cancer. World J Surg 1982;6:578–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mentges B. Kontroversen in der nachsorge des kolonkarzinoms. Zentralbl Chir 1988;113:1087–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schiessel R, Wunderlich M, Herbst F. Local recurrence of colorectal cancer: effect of early detection and aggressive surgery. Br J Surg 1986;73:342–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Secco GB, Fardelli R, Campora E,et al. Factors influencing local recurrence after curative surgery for rectal cancer. Oncology 1989;46:10–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Secco GB, Fardelli R, Campora E,et al. Ergebnisse einer postoperativen nachuntersuchung versus keine nachuntersuchung bei kolorektalen karzinomen. Coloproctology 1990;12:364–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stock W. Bedeutung der nachsorge beim kolorektalen karzinom. Munch Med Wochenschr 1981;44: 1657–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hemanek P. Problems of pTNM classification of carcinoma of the stomach, colorectum and anal margin. Pathol Res Pract 1986;181:296–300.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wagner G. Tumorlokalisationsschlüssel. International classifikation of disease for oncology (ICD-O). Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Altman T. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mentges B, Stahlschmidt M, Brückner R. Die effektivität der nachsorge beim coloncarcinom. Langenbecks Arch Chir 1987;370:223–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ovaska JT, Järvinen H, Mecklin JP. The value of a follow-up programme after radical surgery for colorectal carcinoma. Scand J Gastroenterol 1989;24: 416–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ovaska JT, Järvinen H, Perttilä I, Mecklin JP. Follow-up of patients operated on for colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 1990;159:593–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schiessel R, Wenzl E. Was bringt die nachsorge beim kolorektalen karzinom? Wien Med Wochenschr 1988;11:263–6.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Beart RW, Metzger PP, O'Connell MJ, Schutt AJ. Postoperative screening of patients with carcinoma of the colon. Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:585–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Beart RW, O'Connell MJ. Postoperative follow-up of patients with carcinoma of the colon. Mayo Clin Proc 1983;58:361–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Deveney KE, Lawrence WW. Follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer. Am J Surg 1984;148:717–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hulton NR, Hargreaves AW. Is long-term follow-up of all colorectal cancer necessary? J R Coll Surg Edinb 1989;34:21–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Isbister WH. The follow-up of patients following surgery for colorectal cancer—a personal view. Ann Acad Med 1988;17:66–71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Törnquist A, Ekelund G, Leandoer L. The value of intensive follow-up after curative resection for colorectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1982;69:725–8.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cochrane JP, Williams JT, Faber RG, Slack WW. Value of outpatient follow-up after curative surgery for carcinoma of the large bowel. BMJ 1980;280: 593–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Schildberg FW. Probleme des lokalrezidivs nach colorectalem carcinom. Langenbecks Arch Chir 1987; 372:505–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mentges B, Mentges W, Grüßner R, Brückner R. Art und prognose des lokoregionären rezidivs beim rektumkarzinom. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1988;113: 806–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Häring R, Karavias Th. Das locoregionale rezidiv nach rectumresektion bzw. Rectumexstirpation. Chirurg 1988;59:634–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fortner J. Recurrence of colorectal cancer after hepatic resection. Am J Surg 1988;155:378–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Scheele J, Stangl R, Altendorf-Hofmann A. Hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma: impact of surgical resection on the natural history. Br J Surg 1990; 77:1241–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Stone MD, Cady B, Jenkins RL,et al. Surgical therapy for recurrent liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Arch Surg 1990;125:718–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Böhm B, Osswald HJ, Hucke HP, Stock W. Individuelle risikoadaptierte nachsorge beim kolorektalen karzinom? Langenbecks Arch Chir 1991;376: 314–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Surgery, Marien-Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany

    B. Böhm M.D., PhD., W. Schwenk M.D. & W. Stock M.D.

  2. Biometrical Institute, Aachen, Germany

    H. P. Hucke Ph.D.

Authors
  1. B. Böhm M.D., PhD.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W. Schwenk M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. P. Hucke Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. W. Stock M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Böhm, B., Schwenk, W., Hucke, H.P. et al. Does methodic long-term follow-up affect survival after curative resection of colorectal carcinoma?. Dis Colon Rectum 36, 280–286 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02053511

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02053511

Key words

Search

Navigation