Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 275–279 | Cite as

Rectal endosonography in the evaluation of stenotic rectal tumors

  • Michael Bachmann Nielsen
  • Jan Fog Pedersen
  • John Christiansen
Original Contributions
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

Preoperative evaluation of stenotic rectal tumors is important since they often involve adjacent organs and thus may require additional therapy. Previous reports on endosonographic staging have excluded stenotic tumors because they could not be fully visualized with the available equipment. In this study, we have evaluated the role of endosonography in staging stenotic rectal tumors, with special attention to the use of forward-looking endoprobes. Preoperative staging was performed in 28 patients with stenotic rectal tumors. Tumor extension was evaluated according to the TNM classification, and the results were compared with surgical and histopathologic findings. Endosonography accurately assessed tumor extension in two T2 tumors, 14 T3 tumors, and seven T4 tumors. Three T2 tumors were overstaged, and two T4 tumors were staged as T3. The accuracy was 82 percent. Twenty-two tumors were subject to histopathologic evaluation of lymph nodes. Lymph nodes larger than 1 cm had been seen by endosonography in eight patients, five of whom had nodal metastases. Lymph nodes smaller than 1 cm or no lymph nodes were found in 14 patients, four of whom had nodal metastases. In conclusion, full sonographic visualization of stenotic rectal tumors and thus evaluation of tumor extension can be achieved by using forwardlooking endoprobes.

Key words

Rectal cancer Endosonography Stenosis Preoperative staging 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Beynon J. An evaluation of the role of rectal endosonography in rectal cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1989;71:131–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hildebrandt U, Feifel G, Schwarz HP, Scherr O. Endorectal ultrasound: instrumentation and clinical aspects. Int J Colorectal Dis 1986;1:203–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Saitoh N, Okui K, Sarashina H, Suzuki M, Arai T, Nunomura M. Evaluation of echographic diagnosis of rectal cancer using intrarectal ultrasonic examination. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:234–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Glaser F, Schlag P, Herfarth C. Endorectal ultrasonography for the assessment of invasion of rectal tumors and lymph node involvement. Br J Surg 1990;77:883–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Orrom WJ, Wong WD, Rothenberger DA, Jensen LL, Goldberg SM. Endorectal ultrasound in the preoperative staging of rectal tumors: a learning experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:654–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jochem RJ, Reading CC, Dozois RR, Carpenter HA, Wolff BG, Charboneau JW. Endorectal ultrasonographic staging of rectal carcinoma. Mayo Clin Proc 1990;65:1571–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Glaser F, Friedl P, Ditfurth B, Schlag P, Herfarth C. Influence of endorectal ultrasound on surgical treatment of rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 1990;16: 304–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yamashita Y, Machi J, Shirouzu K, Morotomi T, Isomoto H, Kakegawa T. Evaluation of endorectal ultrasound for the assessment of wall invasion of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:617–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rifkin MD, Ehrlich SM, Marks GM. Staging of rectal carcinoma: prospective comparison of endorectal US and CT. Radiology 1989;170:319–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heintz A, Buess G, Junginger T. Endorektale Sonographie zur präoperativen Beurteilung der Infiltrationstiefe von Rektumtumoren. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1990;115:1083–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Holm HH, Myschetzky P, Nielsen L, Nolsøe C. An ultrasonic multipurpose/multiplane endoprobe. Acta Radiol 1990;31:630–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Påhlman L, Glimelius B. Pre- or postoperative radiotherapy in rectal and rectosigmoid carcinoma: report from a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 1990;211:187–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Frykholm G, Glimelius B, Påhlman L. Preoperative irradiation with and without chemotherapy (MFL) in the treatment of primarily non-resectable adenocarcinoma of the rectum: results from two consecutive studies. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1989;25:1535–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moertel CG, Fleming TR, MacDonald JS,et al. Levamisole and fluorouracil for adjuvant therapy of resected colon carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1990;322: 352–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beynon J, Mortensen NJ, Rigby HS. Rectal endosonography, a new technique for the preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 1988; 14:297–309.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Beynon J, Mortensen NJ, Foy DM, Channer JL, Rigby H, Virjee J. Preoperative assessment of mesorectal lymph node involvement in rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1989;76:276–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nielsen MB, Pedersen JF, Hald J, Christiansen J. Recurrent extraluminal rectal carcinoma: transrectal biopsy under sonographic guidance. AJR 1992;158:1025–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Bachmann Nielsen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jan Fog Pedersen
    • 1
    • 2
  • John Christiansen
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Radiology and UltrasoundGlostrup Hospital, University of CopenhagenGlostrupDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Gastroenterologic Surgery DGlostrup Hospital, University of CopenhagenGlostrupDenmark

Personalised recommendations