Advertisement

Mycopathologia et mycologia applicata

, Volume 44, Issue 2, pp 131–141 | Cite as

The relation of extracellular amylase, mycelium, and time, in some thermophilic and mesophilic humicola species

  • E. A. Barnett
  • C. L. Fergus
Article

Abstract

All four fungi studied attained approximately the same dry weight of mycelium in starch-yeast extract medium. Only about one-fourth the amount of mycelia was produced in yeast extract alone (starch omitted). However, the initial growth rate ofH. grisea var.thermoidea was greater than the other three fungi. Extracellular amylase was produced by all four fungi, butH. lanuginosa produced 8 to 12 times as much as the other three. Maximum extracellular amylase was found before autolysis with these three fungi, but after autolysis withH. lanuginosa. Extracellular amylase was detected in YE medium (lacking starch), but in very low amounts (approximately one-eighth the amount observed as when starch was present). Increasing the amount of starch in the medium increased extracellular amylase. However, when the starch concentration was kept constant, increasing the concentration of yeast extract had no effect on extracellular amylase.

Keywords

Growth Rate Starch Yeast Extract Amylase Initial Growth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bernfeld, P. (1951) Enzymes of starch degradation and synthesis.Adv. in Enzymol. 12:379–428.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chang, Y. (1967) The fungi of wheat straw compost. II. Biochemical and physiological studies.Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 50:667–677.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crewther, W. G. &Lennox, F. G. (1953) Enzymes ofAspergillus oryzae III. The sequence of appearance and some properties of the enzymes liberated during growth.Australian J. Biol. Sci. 6:410–427.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Erb, N. M., Wisthoff, R. T. &Jacobs, W. L. (1948) Factors affecting the production of amylase byAspergillus niger strain NRRL 337, when grown in submerged culture.J. Bacteriol. 55:813–821.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fergus, C. L. (1969) The cellulolytic activity of thermophilic fungi and actinomycetes.Mycologia 61:120–129.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fergus, C. L. (1969) The production of amylase by some thermophilic fungi.Mycologia 61:1171–1175.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harter, E. L. (1921) Amylase ofRhizopus tritici, with a consideration of its secretion and action.J. Agric. Res. 20:761–786.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lemense, E. H., Corman, J., Lanen, J. M. van &Langlykke, A. F. (1947) Production of mold amylase in submerged culture.J. Bacteriol. 54:149–159.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shu, P. &Blackwood, A. C. (1951) Studies on carbon and nitrogen sources for the production of amylolytic enzymes by submerged culture ofAspergillus niger.Canad. J. Bot. 29:113–124.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. W. Junk N.V. 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. A. Barnett
  • C. L. Fergus
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity Park

Personalised recommendations