Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of epidural anesthesia on colorectal anastomosis

A tonometric assessment

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Epidural anesthesia is believed to benefit colorectal anastomotic blood flow because of the sympathetic blockade it produces. Our purpose is to measure with tonometry the effect of epidural anesthesia on colorectal anastomotic oxygenation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients operated on for rectal cancer (radical anterior resection) were monitored postoperatively using tonometers placed in the stomach (celiac trunk), transverse colon (superior mesenteric artery), and the anastomotic area during the operation. An epidural catheter was placed at L1-2, and on the first postoperative day, 8 ml of bupivacaine (0.25 percent) was administered. The anesthetic effect extended up to T-4. Intramucosal pH (pHi) at the three locations was measured before, during, and after the epidural blockade. RESULTS: Gastric and transverse colon pHi increased during the epidural blockade from 7.35±0.01 to 7.41±0.01 and from 7.34±0.02 to 7.40±0.02, respectively. The anastomotic pHi decreased from 7.3±0.02 to 7.24±0.03 under the epidural and increased up to 7.34±0.02 after withdrawal of the effect on the following day. All pHi variations were statistically significant (P<0.05, paired Student'st-test and Wilcoxon's test), because it was the comparison between gastric and transverse colon pHi with the anastomotic pHi during the epidural (P<0.05, one-way analysis of variance and Kruskal-Wallis tests). None of the patients developed anastomotic or other complications. CONCLUSIONS: Epidural anesthesia with bupivacaine causes a significant decrease in the oxygenation-perfusion state of colorectal anastomosis in comparison with the increase in other areas of the digestive tract. Further studies need to be done to see if other epidural anesthetic-analgesic protocols also worsen colorectal anastomotic blood flow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haglund U. Gut ischaemia. Gut 1994;35(Suppl 1):S73–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goligher JC, Graham NG, De Dombal FT. Anastomotic dehiscence after anterior resection of rectum and sigmoid. Br J Surg 1970;57:109–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tagart RE. Colorectal anastomosis: factors influencing success. J R Soc Med 1981;74:111–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schrock TR, Deveney CW, Dunphy JE. Factors contributing to leakage of colonic anastomoses. Ann Surg 1973;177:513–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Irvin TT, Goligher JC. Aetiology of disruption of intestinal anastomoses. Br J Surg 1973;60:461–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aitkenhead AR. Anaesthesia and bowel surgery. Br J Surg 1984;56:95–101.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Whitaker BL. Observations on the blood flow in the inferior mesenteric arterial system and the healing of colonic anastomoses. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1968;43:89–110.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aitkenhead AR, Wishart HY, Peebles Brown DA. High spinal nerve block for large bowel anastomosis: a ret-rospective study. Br J Anaesth 1978;50:177–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Worsley MH, Wishhart HY, Peebles Brown DA, Aitkenhead AR. High spinal nerve block for large bowel anastomosis: a prospective study. Br J Anaesth 1988;60:836–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Johansson K, Ahn H, Lindhagen J, Tryselius U. Effect of epidural anaesthesia on intestinal blood flow. Br J Surg 1988;75:73–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shandall A, Lowndes R, Young HL. Colonic anastomotic healing and oxygen tension. Br J Surg 1985;72:606–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Senagore A, Milsom JW, Walshaw RK, Dunstan R, Mazier WP, Chaudry IH. Intramural pH: a quantitative measurement for predicting colorectal anastomotic healing. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:175–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wexner SD, Cohen SM. Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection. Eur J Surg 1994;160:299–300.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kurland B, Brandt LJ, Delany HM. Diagnostic tests for intestinal ischemia. Surg Clin North Am 1992;72:85–105.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fiddian-Green RG. Tonometry: theory and applications. Intensive Care World 1992;9(Parts 2 and 3):60–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lanciault G, Jacobson DE. The gastrointestinal circulation. Gastroenterology 1976;71:851–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schulze S, Sommer P, Bigler D,et al. Effect of combined prednisolone, epidural analgesia, and indomethacin on the systemic response after colonic surgery. Arch Surg 1992;127:325–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Aitkenhead AR, Gilmour DG, Hothersall AP, Ledingham IM. Effects of subarachnoid spinal nerve block and arterial pCO2 on colon blood flow in the dog. Br J Anaesth 1980;52:1071–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Morgan M, Norman J. The effect of extradural analgesia combined with light general anaesthesia and spontaneous ventilation on arterial blood gases and physiological deadspace. Br J Anaesth 1975;47:955–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ryan P, Schweitzer S, Woods RJ. Effect of epidural and general anaesthesia compared with general anaesthesia alone in large bowel anastomoses. Eur J Surg 1992;158:45–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ryan P, Schweitzer S, Collopy B, Taylor D. Combined epidural and general anesthesiaversus general anesthesia in patients having a colon and rectal anastomoses. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 1988;550:146–51.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Carlstedt A, Nordgren S, Fasth S, Appelgren L, Hultén L. Epidural anaesthesia and postoperative colorectal motility—a possible hazard to a colorectal anastomosis. Int J Colorectal Dis 1989;4:144–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bigler D, Hjortso N-C, Kehlet H. Disruption of colonic anastomosis during continuous epidural analgesia. Anaesthesia 1985;40:278–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bulkley GB, Womack WA, Downey JM, Kvietys PR, Granger DN. Collateral blood flow in segmental intestinal ischemia: effects of vasoactive agents. Surgery 1986;100:157–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by a grant from the Spanish Society of Digestive Diseases, Madrid, Spain. All tonometric catheters and drugs were donated by the Clinic University Hospital of Valencia, Spain.

Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Seattle, Washington, June 9 to 14, 1996.

About this article

Cite this article

Sala, C., García-Granero, E., Molina, M.J. et al. Effect of epidural anesthesia on colorectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 40, 958–961 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02051205

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02051205

Key words

Navigation