Skip to main content
Log in

Protection of intestinal anastomoses by biodegradable intraluminal bypass tubes under the condition of general peritonitis: An experimental study on the CLP model in rats

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

The purpose of this experimental study was to affirm the protective effect of biodegradable tubes for the intraluminal bypass procedure under the adverse condition of general peritonitis. General peritonitis was induced by means of the cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) model in the rat. The leakage rate in the control group (n=20) without anastomotic protection was 70 percent (14/20). In three therapeutic groups, each consisting of 20 animals, the intestinal anastomoses were protected by an intraluminal bypass tube of different biodegradable biomaterials (collagen-II, BCL-002, and BCL-004). The best results were noted in the collagen-II and BCL-002 groups, where the leakage rates could be reduced to 10 percent. These highly significant results (P=0.0001) prove the feasibility of biodegradable biomaterials for the intraluminal bypass procedure in the rat, even in cases with underlying peritonitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ger R, Ravo B. Prevention and treatment of intestinal dehiscence by an intraluminal bypass graft. Br J Surg 1984;1:726–9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ravo B, Ger R. Intracolonic bypass by an intraluminal tube: an experimental study. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:360–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ravo B, Ger R. Temporary colostomy—an outmoded procedure? A report on the intracolonic bypass. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:904–7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ravo B, Ger R. Management of esophageal dehiscences by an intraluminal bypass tube. Am J Surg 1985;149:733–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Winkeltau G, Treutner K-H, Bertram P, Lerch MM, Ger R. The use of biodegradable tubes for intraluminal bypass procedures. Res Surg 1991;3:212–7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wichterman KA, Baue AE, Chaudry IH. Sepsis and septic shock—a review of laboratory models and a proposal. J Surg Res 1980;29:189–201.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fraser I. An historical perspective on mechanical aids in intestinal anastomosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1982;155:566–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Corman ML, Prager ED, Hardy TG Jr, Bubrick MP, and the Valtrac (BAR) study groups. Comparison of the VALTRAC biofragmentable anastomosis ring with conventional suture and stapled anastomosis in colon surgery: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:183–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McCue JL, Phillips RK. Sutureless intestinal anastomoses. Br J Surg 1991;78:1291–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Launer DP, Sackier JM. Pouch-anal anastomosis without diverting ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:993–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Winkeltau, G.J., Treutner, KH., Kleimann, E. et al. Protection of intestinal anastomoses by biodegradable intraluminal bypass tubes under the condition of general peritonitis: An experimental study on the CLP model in rats. Dis Colon Rectum 36, 154–160 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02051171

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02051171

Key words

Navigation