Advertisement

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

, Volume 34, Issue 9, pp 780–783 | Cite as

En bloc resection of colon carcinoma adherent to other organs: An efficacious treatment?

  • H. Kroneman
  • A. Castelein
  • J. Jeekel
Original Contributions

Abstract

From 1977 to 1984, 56 patients with colon cancer adherent to other organs were operated upon. Twenty-three (41 percent) underwent palliative treatment without resection. The mean survival in this group was 6 months. The results ofen blocresection were evaluated in 33 patients (59 percent) with colon carcinoma and tumor growth in adjacent organs. Pathologic staging was based on Dukes' (Astler and Coller) classification. Dukes' B carcinoma was shown in 15 patients. Dukes' C in 14 patients, and Dukes' D in four patients. The 4-year survival rate was as follows: Dukes' B, 47 percent; Dukes' C, 29 percent; and Dukes' D, 0 percent. The 4-year survival rate for the whole group was 33 percent. The postoperative morbidity and mortality were 6 percent and 3 percent, respectively. Colon cancer with involvement of adjacent structures should not be regarded as an incurable Dukes' D carcinoma;en blocresection is indicated and can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality.

Key words

En blocresection Colon carcinoma Tumor infiltration Dukes' (Astler and Coller) classification 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Turnbull RB Jr, Kyle K, Watson FR, Spratt J. Cancer of the colon: the influence of theno-touch isolation technic on survival rates. Ann Surg 1967;166:420–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gall FP, Tonak J, Altendorf A. Multivisceral resections in colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:337–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bonfanti G, Bozzetti F, Doci R,et al. Results of extended surgery for cancer of the rectum and sigmoid. Br J Surg 1982;69:305–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Durdey P, Williams NS. The effect of malignant and inflammatory fixation of rectal carcinoma on prognosis after rectal excision. Br J Surg 1984;71:787–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Minsky BD, Mies C, Rich TA, Recht A, Chaffey JT. Potentially curative surgery of colon cancer: patterns of failure and survival. J Clin Oncol 1988;6:106–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eldar S, Kemeny MM, Terz JJ. Extended resections for carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1985;161:319–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hunter JA, Ryan JA Jr, Schultz P. En bloc resection of colon cancer adherent to other organs. Am J Surg 1987;154:67–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grinnel RS. Lymphomatic metastases of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Ann Surg 1950;131:494–506.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    McDermott FT, Hughes ES, Pihi E, Johnson WR, Price AB. Local recurrence after potentially curative resection for rectal cancer in a series of 1008 patients. Br J Surg 1985;72:34–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wiggers T, Jeekel J, Arends JW,et al. No-touch isolation technique in colon cancer: a controlled prospective trial. Br J Surg 1988;75:409–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jeekel J. Can radical surgery improve survival in colorectal cancer? World J Surg 1987;11:412–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jeekel J, Wiggers T, Marquet RL. Methods for prevention of metastases in the perioperative phase. In: Van de Velde CJH, Sugarbaker PH, eds. Liver metastasis: basic aspects, detection, and management. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1984:55–63.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Kroneman
    • 1
  • A. Castelein
    • 1
  • J. Jeekel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity Hospital Rotterdam-DijkzigtRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations