Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Hartmann's procedurevs. abdominoperineal resection for palliation of advanced low rectal cancer

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

In managing advanced low rectal adenocarcinomas in medically fit patients, surgical resection offers the best palliation. Tenesmus, bleeding per rectum, sacral pain, and sciatic pain are common complaints, which are not relieved by radiotherapy or fulguration. The most appropriate resection, however, remains controversial. Abdominoperineal resection is faster and simpler to perform but leaves behind a perineal wound with associated complications. Hartmann's procedure requires adequate mobilization below the tumor and may be technically more demanding but avoids a perineal wound. Therefore, an analysis of outcome in patients treated by Hartmann's procedure vs. abdominoperineal resection was made. METHOD: Fifty-four symptomatic patients with advanced rectal adenocarcinoma arising within a median of 5 (range, 4–8) cm from the anal verge treated between June 1989 and October 1995 were studied. Twenty-eight patients (17 males; mean age, 67.6±10.3 years) had Hartmann's procedure, and 26 patients (12 females; mean age, 68.8±8.3 years) were treated by abdominoperineal resection. Mean follow-up was 23.5 months (±17.5) and 18.6 months (±12.9) in Hartmann's procedure and abdominoperineal groups, respectively. RESULTS: Mean operative time was 138.4±26.7 minutes for Hartmann's procedure group and 124.6±27.1 minutes for the abdominoperineal resection group ( P >0.05; not significant). Postoperatively, Hartmann's procedure group started oral intake at a mean of 2.3 days, and stomas were functioning at a mean of 3.1 days compared with 2.6 days for oral intake and 3 days for stoma functioning in the abdominoperineal resection group. Hartmann's procedure group was ambulant after a mean of 2.4 days vs. a mean of 3.2 days in the abdominoperineal resection group. Postoperative abdominal wound infection occurred in 18 and 19 percent, respectively, in Hartmann's procedure and abdominoperineal resection groups. Forty-six percent of patients had perineal wound sepsis, and 38 percent had perineal wound pain in the abdominoperineal resection group. These complications were absent in Hartmann's procedure group. Postoperative stay was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: We conclude that Hartmann's procedure offers superior palliation compared with abdominoperineal resection because it provides good symptomatic control without any perineal wound complications and pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cohen AM, Winawer SJ, Friedman SJ, Gunderson LL. Cancer of the colon, rectum and anus. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995:596.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Moran MR, Rothenberger DA, Lahr CJ,et al. Palliation for rectal cancer—resection? Anastomosis. Arch Surg 1987;122:640–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cattell RB. The factors influencing operability and mortality in carcinoma of the large bowel. Proceedings of the International Assembly Inter-State Post-Graduate M. A. North America. 1938:91–5.

  4. Lahey FH. Treatment of carcinoma of the colon [discussion]. Ann Surg 1945;121:409–10.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Modlin J, Walker HS. Palliative resection in cancer of colon and rectum. Cancer 1949;2:767–76.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gordon PH, Nivatvongs S. Principles and practice of surgery for the colon, rectum, and anus. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing, 1992:596–653.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson WR, McDermott FT, Pihl E, Milne BJ, Price AB, Hughes ES. Palliative operative management in rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:606–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bordos DC, Baker RR, Cameron JL. An evaluation of palliative abdominoperineal resection for carcinoma of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1974;139:731–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Joffe J, Gordon PH. Palliative resection for colorectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:355–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Takaki HS, Ujiki GT, Shields TS. Palliative resections in the treatment of primary colorectal cancer. Am J Surg 1977;133:548–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Block GE, Enker WE. Survival after operation for rectal cancer in patients over 70 years. Ann Surg 1971;174:521–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Madden JL, Kandalaft S. Clinical evaluation in the treatment of cancer of the rectum. Am J Surg 1971;122:347–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bacon HE, Martin PV. The rationale of palliative resection for primary cancer of colon and rectum complicated by liver and lung metastases. Dis Colon Rectum 1964;7:211–7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lockhart-Mummery HE. Surgery in patients with advanced carcinoma of colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1959;2:36–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Martin RG, Soriano SJ, Clark LR, White EC. Abdominoperineal resection as palliation for advanced rectal cancer. Cancer Bull 1966;2:28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Longo WE, Ballantyne GH, Bilchik HJ, Modlin IM. Advanced rectal cancer: what is the best palliation? Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:842–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gady B, Monson DO, Swinton NW Sr. Survival of patients after colonic resection for carcinoma with simultaneous liver metastases. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1970;131:697–700.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Oxley EM, Ellis H. Prognosis of carcinoma of the large bowel in the presence of liver metastases. Br J Surg 1969;56:149–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sterns MW Jr, Binkley GE. Palliative surgery for cancer of the rectum and colon. Cancer 1954;7:1016–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bussey HJ. The survival rate of patients with advanced rectal cancer. J R Soc Med 1969;62:1221–3.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Goligher JC: Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. 2nd ed. Springfield: Charles C Thomas, 1967:609–775.

    Google Scholar 

  22. ReMine SG, Dozois RR. Hartmnn's procedure: its use with complicated carcinoma of sigmoid colon and rectum. Arch Surg 1981;116:630–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, 119608, Singapore

    S. M. Heah F.R.C.S.,  K. W. Eu F.R.C.S., Y. H. Ho F.R.A.C.S., A. F. P. K. Leong F.R.C.S. & F. Seow-Choen F.R.C.S.

Authors
  1. S. M. Heah F.R.C.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. W. Eu F.R.C.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Y. H. Ho F.R.A.C.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. F. P. K. Leong F.R.C.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. F. Seow-Choen F.R.C.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Heah, S.M., Eu, K.W., Ho, Y.H. et al. Hartmann's procedurevs. abdominoperineal resection for palliation of advanced low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 40, 1313–1317 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050815

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050815

Key words

Search

Navigation