Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare treatment outcomes in the management of pelvic abscess (PA) after rectal surgery. METHODS: Over a 12-year period all PAs occurring in the patients undergoing colorectal resection were retrospectively reviewed. The APACHE II Score was used to stratify illness. RESULTS: Postoperative PA developed in 56 patients after cancer (32 percent), ulcerative colitis (26 percent), diverticular disease (24 percent), and Crohn's colitis (18 percent)/surgery. Overall, 24 (43 percent) of PAs were after operations for inflammatory bowel disease and 43(77 percent) of PAs were after intrapelvic intestinal anastomoses. PAs were treated by 1) antibiotics alone (11/56), 2) percutaneous computerized tomography-guided catheter drainage (13/56), 3) transperineal drainage (15/56), or 4) laparotomy (17/56). Recurrent PAs developed in 11/56 (19 percent) after initial treatment, of which 7 required additional surgery. These recurrences were evenly distributed between treatment groups. There were three deaths as a result of PA, two after laparotomy and one after percutaneous drainage. Long-term sequela in patients with intestinal anastomosis included loss of intestinal continuity (10/43) and anastomotic stenosis (7/43). There was no difference in APACHE II Score among the four treatment groups. The mortality rate was 75 percent among patients whose APACHE II Scores were greater than 15. The development of a PA after colon and rectal surgery was associated with a 5 percent mortality and 41 percent functional morbidity (23 percent permanent stoma and 18 percent symptomatic stricture rate). CONCLUSION: Using clinical judgment, if PA is amenable to computerized tomographyguided percutaneous or transperineal drainage, one of these techniques should be attempted initially in the hemodynamically stable nonseptic patient. Long-term functional disability is common after PA in rectosigmoid surgery in patients who undergo pelvic/intestinal anastomosis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lurie K, Plazk L, Deveney CW. Intra-abdominal abscess in the 1980's. Surg Clin North Am 1987;67: 621–32.
Fry DE, Garrison N, Heitsch RC,et al. Determinations of death in patients With intra-abdominal abscesses. Surgery 1980;88:517–23.
Johnson WB, Gerzof SG, Robbins AH,et al. Treatment of abdominal abscesses. Ann Surg 1981;194:510–20.
Goligher JC, Graham NG, DeDombal FT. Anastomotic dehiscence after anterior resection of rectum and sigmoid. Br J Surg 1970;57:109–18.
Foster ME, Lancaster JB, Leaper DJ. Leakage of low rectal anastomosis: an anatomic explanation? Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:157–8.
Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP,et al. APACHE—acute physiology and chronic health evaluation; a physiologically based classification system. Crit Care Med 1981;9:591–7.
Ariel IM, Kazarian KK. Diagnosis and treatment of abdominal abscesses. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1971.
Burney RE, Gudjonsson B, Cahow CE, Spiro HM. Late appearance of intra-abdominal abscesses after total colectomy for inflammatory bowel disease. Arch Surg 1979;114:195–7.
Norton LW. Does drainage of intra-abdominal pus reverse multiple organ failure? Am J Surg 1985;149: 347–50.
Johnson WB, Gerzof SG, Robbins AH,et al. Treatment of abdominal abscesses: comparative evaluation of operation drainageversus percutaneous catheter drainage guided by computed tomography or ultrasound. Ann Surg 1981;194:510–20.
Brolin R, Nosher J, Leiman S,et al. Percutaneous catheterversus open surgical drainage in the treatment of abdominal abscesses. Am J Surg 1984;50: 102–8.
Glass CA, Cohn I Jr. Drainage of intra-abdominal abscesses. Am J Surg 1984;147:315–7.
Hemming A, Davis NL, Robins E. Surgical vs. percutaneous drainage of intra-abdominal abscesses. Am J Surg 1991;161:593–5.
Levinson MA, Zeigler D. Correlation of APACHE II score, drainage technique and outcome in postoperative intra-abdominal abscess. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1991;172:89–94.
Nystrom PO, Bax R, Dellinger EP,et al. Proposed definitions for diagnosis, severity scoring, stratification, and outcome for trials on intra-abdominal infections. World J Surg 1990;14:148–58.
Bohnen JMA, Mustard RA, Oxholm SE,et al. APACHE II score and abdominal sepsis: a prospective study. Arch Surg 1988;123:225–9.
Lindquist K, Nilsell K, Liljeqvist T. Cuff abscesses and ileoanal anastomotic separations in pelvic pouch surgery. An analysis of possible etiologic factors. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:355–9.
Ambrose NS, Alexander-Williams J, Keighley MR. Audit of sepsis in operations for inflammatory bowel disease. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:602–4.
Lake SP, Hancock BD, Lewis AA. Management of pelvic sepsis after Ivalon rectopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;71:209–11.
Higgens C, Allan RN, Keighley MR, Arabi Y. Sepsis following operation for inflammatory intestinal disease. Dis Colon Rectum 1980;23:102–5.
Metcalf AM, Dozois RR, Kelly KA,et al. Ileal “J” pouch-anal anastomosis: clinical outcome. Ann Surg 1985;202:735–9.
Fleshman JW, Cohen Z, McLeod RS,et al. The ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis procedure: factors affecting technical and functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:10–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, San Francisco, California, June 7 to 12, 1992.
About this article
Cite this article
Longo, W.E., Milsom, J.W., Lavery, I.C. et al. Pelvic abscess after colon and rectal surgery — What is optimal management?. Dis Colon Rectum 36, 936–941 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050629
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050629