Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dynamic anal manometry in the assessment of patients with obstructed defecation

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Patients with obstructed defecation show no consistent abnormalities when assessed by standard anorectal physiologic methods. With a recently developed technique for dynamic anal manometry, we studied 13 female patients with obstructed defecation and 20 healthy volunteers. Seven parameters of anal function were measured. There were no differences between the median values for the two groups. Seven patients (54 percent; 95 percent confidence limits, 25–81 percent) had anal compliance below the normal range, either during opening or closing of the sphincter at rest (five patients), during squeeze (one patient), or both (one patient). Opening and closing pressures of the sphincer at rest, maximal closing pressure during squeeze, and anal hysteresis were normal. Standard anal manometry did not show any differences between patients and controls. Rectal compliance was lower in patients with obstructed defecation, median difference 5 ml/cm H 2 O (95 percent confidence limits, 1–9 ml/cm H 2 O). In conclusion, the more detailed method of dynamic anal manometry shows that some patients with obstructed defecation have a less compliant anal sphincter and a less compliant rectum, but in many patients no abnormal findings can be made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Read NW, Timms JM, Barfield LJ, Donelly TC, Bannister JJ. Impairment of defecation in young women with severe constipation. Gastroenterology 1986;90: 53–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shouler P, Keighley MR. Changes in colorectal function in severe idiopathic chronic constipation. Gastroenterology 1986;90:414–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Roe AM, Bartolo DC, Mortensen NJ. Diagnosis and surgical management of intractable constipation. Br J Surg 1986;73:854–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Varma JS, Smith AN. Neurophysiological dysfunction in young women with intractable constipation. Gut 1988;29:963–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wald A, Caruna BJ, Freimanis MG, Bauman DH, Hinds JP. Contributions of evacuation proctography and anorectal manometry to evaluation of adults with constipation and defecatory difficulty. Dig Dis Sci 1990;35:481–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller R, Duthie GS, Bartolo DC, Roe AM, Locke-Edmunds J, Mortensen NJ. Anismus in patients with normal and slow transit constipation. Br J Surg 1991;78:690–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jones PN, Lubowski DZ, Swash M, Henry MM. Is paradoxical contraction of puborectalis muscle of functional importance. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30: 667–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rasmussen OØ, Colstrup H, Lose G, Christiansen J. A technique for the dynamic assessment of anal sphincter function. Int J Colorectal Dis 1990;5: 135–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rasmussen OØ Sørensen M, Tetzschner T, Christiansen J. Dynamic anal manometry: physiological variations and pathophysiological findings in fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 1992;103:103–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Skomorowska E, Henrichsen S, Christiansen J, Hegedus V. Videodefaecography combined with measurement of the anorectal angle and of perineal descent. Acta Radiol 1987;28:559–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Turnbull GK, Bartram CI, Lennard-Jones JE. Radiologic studies of rectal evacuation in adults with idiopathic constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31: 190–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Harris JH, Therkelsen EE, Zinner NR. Electrical measurements of ureteral flow. In: Boyarsky S, Gottschalk CW, Tanagho EM, Zimskind PD, eds. Urodynamics. New York: Academic Press, 1971:465–72.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Krogh Petersen I, Christiansen J. A study of the physiological variation in anal manometry. Br J Surg 1989;76:69–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rasmussen OØ, Christensen B, Sørensen M, Tetzschner T, Christiansen J. Rectal compliance in the assessment of patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:650–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gardner MJ, Altman DG. Statistics with confidence. London: British Medical Journal Publishers, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gibbons CP, Bannister JJ, Read NW. Role of constipation and anal hypertonia in the pathogenesis of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1988;75:656–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Martelli H, Devroede G, Arhan P, Duguay C. Mechanisms of idiopathic constipation: outlet obstruction. Gastroenterology 1978;75:623–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pinho M, Yoshioka K, Keighley MR. Long term results of anorectal myectomy for chronic constipation. Br J Surg 1989;76:1163–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dahl J, Lindquist BL, Tysk C, Leissner P, Philipson L, Jarnerot G. Behavioral medicine treatment in chronic constipation with paradoxical anal sphincter contraction. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:769–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fleshman JW, Dreznik Z, Meyer K, Fry RD, Carney R, Kodner IJ. Outpatient protocol for biofeedback therapy of pelvic floor outlet obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:1–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wexner SD, Cheape JD, Jorge JM, Heymen S, Jagelman DG. Prospective assessment of biofeedback for the treatment of paradoxical puborectalis contraction. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:145–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Rasmussen, O.Ø., Sørensen, M., Tetzschner, T. et al. Dynamic anal manometry in the assessment of patients with obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 36, 901–907 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050623

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050623

Key words

Navigation