Skip to main content
Log in

Notes on aesthetic and moral integrity in Jean Paul

  • Published:
Neophilologus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. NM.IV; p. 1071; 11, 19–25. (NM = Jean Paul,Sämtliche Werke, edited by Norbert Miller, 9 vols (Munich, 1959–1977). References take the form ofNM. followed by the volume, page, and line numbers.)

  2. SW.I; 18; p. 158; 11.3–4, 18. (SW. =Jean Pauls sämtliche Werke, historisch-kritische Ausgabe, edited by Eduard Berend (Weimar, 1927ff). References take the form ofSW. followed by the section, volume, page, and line numbers.)

  3. Levana oder Erziehlehre, first published 1807; second edition 1813.NM. V; p. 855; 11.14–15.

  4. This somewhat neglected aspect of Jean Paul's work is described admirably in Günther Soffke,Jean Pauls Verhältnis zum Buch, Forschungsstelle für Buchwissenschaft an der Universitätsbibliothek Bonn, Kleine Schriften, 7 (Bonn, 1969).

  5. Siebenkäs = Blumen-, Frucht- und Dornenstücke oder Ehestand, Tod und Hochzeit des Armenadvokaten F. St. Siebenkäs, first edition, 1796, second edition, 1818. It is located inNM. II: references to this volume are to the third, revised edition, Munich, 1971. The pagination of this volume differs slightly from that of the earlier editions.

  6. Leben des Quintus Fixlein, first edition, 1796; second edition, 1801.NM.IV; p. 185; 11.18–19. (In quotations words in italics are those of the original text.)

  7. NM.II; p. 85; 11.1–23.

  8. NM.II; p. 67; 11.12–15; p.80; 11.19–27.

  9. A transaction similar to the one described here occurs later on as well. SeeNM.II; p. 153; 11.7–22.

  10. NM.II; p.35; 1.29.NM.II; p.569; 11.19–20.NM.II; p.468, 1.10 – p.469, 1.4.

  11. NM.II; p. 106; 11.13–35; p. 109, 1.12–p.111, 1.3.NM.II. p.131, 1.12 – p.132, 1.29; p.152, 1.31 – p. 153, 1.22.NM.II. p. 182; 11.26–34.NM.II. p.194, 1.1 – p.196, 1.19.NM.II; p.314, 1.5 – p.318, 1.29.

  12. NM.II; p. 317, 1.26.

  13. NM.II; p.318; 11.18–27.

  14. NM.II; p.163; 11.6–8.

  15. NM.II; p.194; 11.21–23.NM.II; p.85; 11.29–34.NM.II; p.44; 11.27–33; p.261; 11.16–18.

  16. NM.II; p.181; 11.21–22.

  17. NM.II; p.80; 11.27–36.

  18. NM.II; p.100; 11.14–17.NM.II; p.99; 11.18–20.NM.II; p. 242 11.7–9.

  19. NM.II; p.104; 11.33–34.NM.II; p. 105; 11.9–13.

  20. NM.II; p. 104; 11.24–28.

  21. “Über die natürliche Magie der Einbildungskraft” (1795).NM.IV; p.195; 1.3.

  22. Vorschule der Asthetik, first published, 1804; second edition, 1813.NM.V; p.34, 1.27 – p.40, 1.29.

  23. NM.II; p.400; 11.3–6.

  24. NM.II; p.104, 1.19 – p.106, 1.35.

  25. NM.II; p.102; 11.10– 15.NM.II; p. 102; 11.22.–26.NM.II; p.103; 11.4–13.NM.II; p.104; 11.16–18.

  26. NM.II; p.105; 11.14–20.

  27. NM.II; p.105; 11.29–33.

  28. NM.II; p.105; 11.24–25.

  29. NM.V; p.40; 11.20–29.

  30. Ursula Naumann,Predigende Poesie. Zur Bedeutung von Predigt, geistlicher Rede und Predigertum für das Werk Jean Pauls (Nuremberg, 1976), p.26.

  31. NM.II; p.104; 11.19–21.

  32. NM.II; p.105, 1.34 – p.106, 1.8.

  33. NM.II; p.106; 11.27–31.

  34. NM.II; p.244; 11.15–17.

  35. CompareNM.II; p.211; 11.21–29 andNM.II; p.244; 11.32–34.

  36. NM.II; p.109, 1.12 – p.111, 1.3; p.244, 1.34 – p.248, 1.3,NM.II; p.394; 11.11–17.

  37. NM.II; p.394; 11.9– 11.

  38. NM.II; p.400; 1.34.

  39. NM.II; p.402; 11.1–4.

  40. NM.II; p.402; 11.7–11.

  41. Walter Pater,The Renaissance. Studies in Art and Poetry (1873), With an Introduction and Notes by Kenneth Clark, paperback edition, third impression (London, 1971), p.224.

  42. NM.II; p.37, 1.34 – p.38, 1.1.

  43. Emil Staiger, “Jean Paul:Titan. Vorstudien zu einer Auslegung”, inMeisterwerke deutscher Sprache aus dem neunzehnten Jahrhundert, fourth edition (Zürich, 1961), pp.57–99 (p.86).

  44. Vorschule der Ästhetik. NM.V; p. 64; 11.18–22.

  45. NM.V; p.64; 11.15–17.

  46. NM.V; p.43; 11.15–20.

  47. Titan, first published 1800–1803.NM.III; p.325; 11.23–27.

  48. NM.III; p.469; 11.26– 32.

  49. “Geschichte meiner Vorrede zur zweiten Auflage desQuintus Fixlein” (1796).NM.IV; p.20; 11.19–22.

  50. NM.IV; p.22, 1.23 – p.23, 1.3.

  51. Johann Wolfgang Goethe,Kampagne in Frankreich 1792, inGedenkausgabe der Werke, Briefe und Gespräche, edited by Ernst Beutler, 24 vols (Zürich, 1948– 1954), XII, p.243. On the significance of Fraischdö rfer for Jean Paul's attitude to Weimar Classicism see Eduard Berend's introduction toQuintus Fixlein (SW.I; 5; pp.XXVI–XXVII). Naturally Jean Paul could not have had knowledge ofKampagne in Frankreich: I quote these passages simply as examples of the “artistisch-formalistischen” outlook (Berend) which Jean Paul encountered in Weimar and from which he dissented.

  52. Goethe, p.276.

  53. Dr. Katzenbergers Badereise, first published, 1809; second edition, 1822.NM.VI; p.300; 11.13–22. “Des Rektors Florian Fälbels und seiner Primaner Reise nach dem Fichtelberg”,NM.IV; p.248; 11.8– 33.

  54. This review was first published in 1814, and reprinted inKleine Bücherschau (1825).SW. I; 16; p.290, 1.6 – p.291, 1.5.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davies, M.L. Notes on aesthetic and moral integrity in Jean Paul. Neophilologus 66, 235–245 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050613

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050613

Keywords

Navigation