Abstract
Twenty-three patients with rectal prolapse or intussusception were studied to specifically focus on the effect of posterior rectopexy on fecal continence, anal pressure, and rectal capacity. Before operation, five patients were fully continent (A), 10 were continent for solid stools (B) and eight patients were fully incontinent (C). Group A remained fully continent; continence was regained nine times in group B and in group C, three patients regained full continence, two became continent for solid stools, three patients remained incontinent. Other symptoms such as constipation, false urgency, and a feeling of incomplete evacuation were not beneficially influenced by rectopexy. The patients' continence status was correlated to anorectal manometry and rectal capacity measurement. In group B, incremental pressure (P=squeeze — basal P) increased significantly (P<0.02) as well as incremental volume (V=maximum tolerated volume-volume of first sensation) (P<0.05). We conclude that, by an increase of incremental anal pressure and incremental rectal volume, posterior rectopexy offers an 83 percent chance of regaining full continence, or a major improvement, and a 17 percent chance of stabilization of fecal incontinence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hoffman MJ, Kodner IJ, Fry RD. Internal intussusception of the rectum, diagnosis and surgical management. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:435–41.
Holmstrom B, Broden G, Dolk A. Results of the Ripstein operation in the treatment of rectal prolapse and internal rectal procidentia. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:845–8.
ten Cate Hoedemaker HO, Gooszen HG. Rectal prolapse. In: Gooszen HG, ten Cate Hoedemaker, Weterman IT, Keighley MRB, eds. Disordered Defaecation. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1987:165–72.
Keighley MR, Fielding JW, Alexander-Williams J. Results of Marlex mesh abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse in 100 consecutive patients. Br J Surg 1983;70:229–32.
Arndorfer RC, Stef JJ, Dodds WJ, Linehan JH, Hogan WJ. Improved infusion system for intraluminal esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology 1977;73:23–7.
Atkinson KG, Taylor DC. Wells procedure for complete rectal prolapse: a 10-year experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:96–8.
Ihre T. Internal procidentia of the rectum: treatment and results. Scand J Gastroenterol 1972;7:643–6.
Parks AG, Swash M, Urich H. Sphincter denervation in anorectal incontinence and rectal prolapse. Gut 1977;18:656–65.
Snooks SJ, Henry MM, Swash M. Anorectal incontinence and rectal prolapse: differential assessment of the innervation to puborectalis and external anal sphincter muscles. Gut 1985;26:470–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Read at the spring meeting of the British Society of Gastroenterology, Bradford, April 1989.
About this article
Cite this article
Delemarre, J.B.V.M., Gooszen, H.G., Kruyt, R.H. et al. The effect of posterior rectopexy on fecal continence. Dis Colon Rectum 34, 311–316 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050590
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050590