Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effect of posterior rectopexy on fecal continence

A prospective study

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Twenty-three patients with rectal prolapse or intussusception were studied to specifically focus on the effect of posterior rectopexy on fecal continence, anal pressure, and rectal capacity. Before operation, five patients were fully continent (A), 10 were continent for solid stools (B) and eight patients were fully incontinent (C). Group A remained fully continent; continence was regained nine times in group B and in group C, three patients regained full continence, two became continent for solid stools, three patients remained incontinent. Other symptoms such as constipation, false urgency, and a feeling of incomplete evacuation were not beneficially influenced by rectopexy. The patients' continence status was correlated to anorectal manometry and rectal capacity measurement. In group B, incremental pressure (P=squeeze — basal P) increased significantly (P<0.02) as well as incremental volume (V=maximum tolerated volume-volume of first sensation) (P<0.05). We conclude that, by an increase of incremental anal pressure and incremental rectal volume, posterior rectopexy offers an 83 percent chance of regaining full continence, or a major improvement, and a 17 percent chance of stabilization of fecal incontinence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoffman MJ, Kodner IJ, Fry RD. Internal intussusception of the rectum, diagnosis and surgical management. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:435–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Holmstrom B, Broden G, Dolk A. Results of the Ripstein operation in the treatment of rectal prolapse and internal rectal procidentia. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:845–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. ten Cate Hoedemaker HO, Gooszen HG. Rectal prolapse. In: Gooszen HG, ten Cate Hoedemaker, Weterman IT, Keighley MRB, eds. Disordered Defaecation. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1987:165–72.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Keighley MR, Fielding JW, Alexander-Williams J. Results of Marlex mesh abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse in 100 consecutive patients. Br J Surg 1983;70:229–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Arndorfer RC, Stef JJ, Dodds WJ, Linehan JH, Hogan WJ. Improved infusion system for intraluminal esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology 1977;73:23–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Atkinson KG, Taylor DC. Wells procedure for complete rectal prolapse: a 10-year experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:96–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ihre T. Internal procidentia of the rectum: treatment and results. Scand J Gastroenterol 1972;7:643–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Parks AG, Swash M, Urich H. Sphincter denervation in anorectal incontinence and rectal prolapse. Gut 1977;18:656–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Snooks SJ, Henry MM, Swash M. Anorectal incontinence and rectal prolapse: differential assessment of the innervation to puborectalis and external anal sphincter muscles. Gut 1985;26:470–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read at the spring meeting of the British Society of Gastroenterology, Bradford, April 1989.

About this article

Cite this article

Delemarre, J.B.V.M., Gooszen, H.G., Kruyt, R.H. et al. The effect of posterior rectopexy on fecal continence. Dis Colon Rectum 34, 311–316 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050590

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050590

Key words

Navigation