Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Physiologic characteristics of straight and colonic J-pouch anastomoses after rectal excision for cancer

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: The colonic J-pouch anastomosis has been advocated to obviate urgent and frequent defecations following a sphincter-saving rectal excision. Physiologic characteristics of the colonic J-pouch were compared with those of the traditional straight anastomosis and related to clinical function. METHOD: Patients with total mesorectal excision for carcinoma were randomized to either a straight (n=23) or a colonic pouch anastomosis (n=23). The patients were examined before and at one year after surgery (n=42), which included laboratory studies, and a questionnaire regarding anorectal function was completed. RESULTS: Preoperative compliance of the rectum was restored after surgery in the pouch group, 2.9 (2.2–3.4) ml/cm H 2 O, but there was a significant decrease after surgery in the straight anastomosis group, 1.9 (1.1–2.3) P <0.001 (median (interquartile range)). Sphincter pressures in both groups were similar. In a multiple regression analysis, high compliance was associated with favorable clinical function, and hypermotility of the anal canal was associated with adverse clinical function. CONCLUSIONS: Colonic pouch-anal anastomosis restores neorectal compliance, which is important for good function after low anterior resection. Presence of an unstable internal sphincter is a negative factor for clinical function in both straight and pouch anastomoses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williams NS, Price R, Johnston D. The long term effect of sphincter preserving operations for rectal carcinoma on function of the anal sphincter in man. Br J Surg 1980;67:203–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Williamson ME, Lewis WG, Holdsworth PJ, Finan PJ, Johnston D. Decrease in the anorectal pressure gradient after low anterior resection of the rectum: a study using continuous ambulatory manometry. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1228–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Karanija ND, Schache DJ, Heald RJ. Function of the distal rectum after low anterior resection for carcinoma. Br J Surg 1992;79:114–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lewis WG, Holdsworth PJ, Stephenson B, Finan PJ, Johnston D. Role of the rectum in the physiological and clinical results of colo-anal and colo-rectal anastomosis after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1992;79:1082–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Heald RJ, Ryall RD. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1986;1:1479–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lazorthes F, Fages P, Chiotasso P, Lemozy J, Bloom E. Resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 1986;73:136–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Parc R, Tiret E, Frilaux P, Moszkowski E, Loygue J. Resection and colo-anal anastomosis with colonic reservoir for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1986;73:139–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hallböök O, Påhlman L, Krog M, Wexner SD, Sjödahl R. Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection. Ann Surg 1996;224:58–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hallböök O, Sjödahl R. Pressure area in anorectal manometry. Eur J Surg 1995;161:603–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Åkervall S, Fasth S, Nordgren S, Öresland T, Hulten L. Rectal reservoir and sensory function studied by graded isobaric distension in normal man. Gut 1989;30:496–502.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hallböök O, Sjödahl R. Techniques of rectal compliance measurement. Semin Colon Rectal Surg 1992;3:88–91.

    Google Scholar 

  12. O'Brien PC. Procedures for comparing samples with multiple endpoints. Biometrics 1984;40:1079–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hallgren T, Fasth S, Nordgren S, Öresland T, Hallsberg L, Hulten L. Manovolumetric characteristics and functional results in three different pelvic pouch designs. Int J Colorectal Dis 1989;4:156–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sorensen M, Rasmussen O, Tetzschner T, Christiansen J. Physiological variation in rectal compliance. Br J Surg 1992;79:1106–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kusunoki M, Shoji Y, Yanagi H,et al. Function after anoabdominal rectal resection and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1991;78:1434–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mortensen NJ, Ramirez JM, Takeuchi N, Smilgin Humphreys MM. Colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis after rectal excision for carcinoma: functional outcome. Br J Surg 1995;82:611–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sun WM, Read NW, Katsinelos P, Donnelly TC, Shorthouse AJ. Anorectal function after restorative proctocolectomy and low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1994;81:280–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Guillemot F, Leroy J, Boniface M,et al. Functional assessment of coloanal anastomosis with reservoir and excision of the anal transitional zone. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:967–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Horgan PG, O'Connell PR, Shinkwin CA, Kirwan WO. Effect of anterior resection on anal sphincter function. Br J Surg 1989;76:783–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Williamson ME, Lewis WG, Finan PJ, Miller AS, Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D. Recovery of physiologic and clinical function after low anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma: myth or reality? Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:411–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Miller AS, Lewis WG, Williamson ME, Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D, Finan PJ. Factors that influence functional outcome after coloanal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 1995;82:1327–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. O'Riordain MG, Molloy RG, Gillen P, Horgan A, Kirwan WO. Rectoanal inhibitory reflex following low stapled anterior resection of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:874–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pedersen IK, Hint K, Olsen J, Christiansen J, Jensen P, Mortensen PE. Anorectal function after low anterior resection for carcinoma. Ann Surg 1986;204:133–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hallgren TA, Fasth SB, Öresland TO, Hultén LA. Ileal pouch anal function after endoanal mucosectomy and handsewn ileoanal anastomosis compared with stapled anastomosis without mucosectomy. Eur J Surg 1995;161:915–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University of Linköping, Linköping, Sweden

    Olof Hallböök M.D., Per -Olof Nyström M.D., Ph.D. & Rune Sjödahl M.D., Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Olof Hallböök M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Per -Olof Nyström M.D., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rune Sjödahl M.D., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Supported by the Research Funds of the University Hospital in Linköping and the County of Östergötland.

About this article

Cite this article

Hallböök, O., Nyström, P.O. & Sjödahl, R. Physiologic characteristics of straight and colonic J-pouch anastomoses after rectal excision for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 40, 332–338 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050425

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050425

Key words

Search

Navigation