Abstract
PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to evaluate repeatability of tests of anorectal function in 58 healthy female volunteers, mean age 50 (range, 45–57) years. METHODS: Participants were studied on two separate occasions by one investigator in one laboratory using the same equipment. RESULTS: Mean difference for perineal position was 0.1 (95 percent confidence interval, −0.1–0.3) cm, and for perineal descent it was 0.02 (−0.2–0.3) cm. For anal mucosa electrosensitivity, mean difference was −0.1 (−0.4–0.1) mA, for maximum anal resting pressure it was 2.2 (−3.5–7.8) cm H 2 O, for maximum anal squeeze pressure it was −1 (−6.5–4.5) cm H 2 O, and for pudendal nerve terminal motor latency it was 0.04 (−0.02–0.09) msec. Coefficients of variation varied from 8 percent for pudendal nerve terminal motor latency to 49 percent for perineal descent. CONCLUSION: There was no systematic variation in repeated measurements for any of the parameters studied; however, the nonsystematic variation was generally large.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Henry MM, Parks AG, Swash M. The pelvic floor musculature in the descending perineum syndrome. Br J Surg 1982;69:470–2.
Read NW, Harford WV, Schmulen AC, Read MG, Santa Ana C, Fordtran JS. A clinical study of patients with fecal incontinence and diarrhea. Gastroenterology 1979;76:747–56.
Womack NR, Morrison JF, Williams NS. The role of pelvic floor denervation in the aetiology of idiopathic faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1986;73:404–7.
Roe AM, Bartolo DC, Mortensen NJ. New method for assessment of anal sensation in various anorectal disorders. Br J Surg 1986;73:310–2.
Snooks SJ, Henry MM, Swash M. Faecal incontinence due to external anal sphincter division in childbirth is associated with damage to the innervation of the pelvic floor musculature: a double pathology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985;92:824–828.
Swash M, Snooks SJ, Henry MM. Unifying concept of pelvic floor disorders and incontinence. J R Soc Med 1985;78:906–11.
Snooks SJ, Henry MM, Swash M. Anorectal incontinence and rectal prolapse: differential assessment of the innervation to puborectalis and external anal sphincter muscles. Gut 1985;26:470–6.
Hiltunen K-M. Anal manometric findings in patients with anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:925–8.
Rogers J, Henry MM, Misiewicz JJ. Combined sensory and motor deficit in primary neuropathic faecal incontinence. Gut 1988;29:5–9.
Miller R, Bartolo DC, Roe A, Cervero F, Mortensen NJ. Anal sensation and the continence mechanism. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:433–8.
Felt-Bersma RJ, Klinkenberg-Knol EC, Meuwissen SG. Anorectal function investigations in incontinent and continent patients: differences and discriminatory value. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:479–85.
McHugh SM, Diamant NE. Effect of age, gender, and parity on anal canal pressures: contribution of impaired anal sphincter function to fecal incontinence. Dig Dis Sci 1987;32:726–36.
Pedersen IK, Christiansen J. A study of the physiological variation in anal manometry. Br J Surg 1989;76:69–70.
Laurberg S, Swash M. Effects of aging on the anorectal sphincters and their innervation. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:737–42.
Akervall S, Nordgren S, Fasth S, Oresland T, Pettersson K, Hulten L. The effects of age, gender, and parity on rectoanal functions in adults. Scand J Gastroenterol 1990;25:1247–56.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307–10.
British Standards Institution. Precision of test methods: guide for the determination of repeatability and reproducibility for a standard test method by inter-laboratory tests. Part 1. London: BSI, 1987.
Armitage P, Berry G. Statistical methods in medical research. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1987;401.
Sorensen SM, Gregersen H, Sorensen S, Djurhuus JC. Spontaneous anorectal pressure activity: evidence of internal anal sphincter contractions in response to rectal pressure waves. Scand J Gastroenterol 1989;24:115–200.
Hancock BD, Smith K. The internal sphincter and Lord's procedure for haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1975;62:833–6.
Haynes WG, Read NW. Ano-rectal activity in man during rectal infusion of saline: a dynamic assessment of the anal continence mechanism. J Physiol 1982;330:45–56.
Rogers J, Laurberg S, Misiewicz JJ, Henry MM, Swash M. Anorectal physiology validated: a repeatability study of the motor and sensory tests of anorectal function. Br J Surg 1989;76:607–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by a grant from the Danish Medical Research Council, Institute of Experimental Clinical Research, University of Aarhus, and the KE Jensen Foundation.
About this article
Cite this article
Ryhammer, A.M., Laurberg, S. & Hermann, A.P. Test-retest repeatability of anorectal physiology tests in healthy volunteers. Dis Colon Rectum 40, 287–292 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050417
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050417