Abstract
PURPOSE: This study was designed to identify factors associated with pelvic pouch failure. METHOD: A retrospective review of patients undergoing the pelvic pouch procedure with a minimum of 30 months follow-up was conducted. RESULTS: A total of 551 patients had pelvic pouch procedures from 1981 to 1992. Forty-nine patients (8.8 percent) have undergone pouch excision, and 9 (1.6 percent) have been defunctioned, for 58 (10.5 percent) patients with pouch failure. Cause of failure was leakage from the ileoanal anastomosis (IAA) in 21 (39 percent) patients, poor functional results in 13 (23 percent), pouchitis in 7 (12 percent), pouch leakage in 7 (12 percent), perianal disease in 7 (12 percent), and miscellaneous in 3 (5.2 percent). Nine of 22 patients (41 percent) had pouch failure during the first two years, with 2 of 147 patients (1 percent) having failure during the last two years of the study. The 58 patients whose pouches failed (Group 1) were compared with the 493 patients whose pouches did not fail (Group 2). Handsewn IAA (P <0.001), tension on the IAA (P <0.001), use of a defunctioning ileostomy (P <0.01), a diagnosis of Crohn's disease (P <0.001), and a leak from the pouch (P <0.001) or the IAA (P <0.001) were associated with pouch failure. Pouchitis was not a risk factor. CONCLUSION: The majority of pouch failures were caused by leaks at the IAA. Although the leak rate remained stable, leaks following a stapled anastomosis seemed to have a better prognosis than leaks following a handsewn anastomosis. Experience with the pouch procedure and the management of complications likely plays an important role in decreasing the risk of pouch failure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gemlo BT, Wong DW, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: patterns of failure. Arch Surg 1992;127:784–7.
Marcello PW, Roberts PL, Schoetz DJ Jr, Coller JA, Murray JJ, Veidenheimer MC. Long-term results of the ileoanal pouch procedure. Arch Surg 1993;128:500–4.
Wettergren A, Gyrtrup HJ, Grosmann E,et al. Complications after J-pouch ileoanal anastomosis: stapled compared with handsewn anastomosis. Eur J Surg 1993;159:121–4.
Fazio VW, Ziv Y, Church JM,et al. Ileal pouch-anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients. Ann Surg 1995;222:120–7.
Foley EF, Schoetz DJ Jr, Roberts PL,et al. Rediversion after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: causes of failures and predictors of subsequent pouch salvage. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38:793–8.
Cohen Z, McLeod RS, Stephen W, Stern HS, O'Connor B, Reznick R. Continuing evolution of the pelvic pouch procedure. Ann Surg 1992;216:506–12.
Seow-Choen F, Tsunoda A, Nicholls RJ. Prospective randomized trial comparing anal function after hand sewn ileoanal anastomosis with mucosectomyversus stapled ileoanal anastomosis without mucosectomy in restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 1991;78:430–4.
Luukkonen P, Jarvinen H. Stapled vs hand-sutured ileoanal anastomosis in restorative proctocolectomy: a prospective, randomized study. Arch Surg 1993;128:437–40.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Dr. MacRae was supported in part by the Wigston Foundation, Toronto, Canada.
Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Seattle, Washington, June 9 to 14, 1996.
About this article
Cite this article
MacRae, H.M., McLeod, R.S., Cohen, Z. et al. Risk factors for pelvic pouch failure. Dis Colon Rectum 40, 257–262 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050412
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050412