Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The reproducibility of measuring the anorectal angle in defecography

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Dynamic proctography is a radiographic procedure that has become widely used in the evaluation of pelvic floor function. The anorectal angle (ARA) is one parameter which is usually quantified during this examination. To determine the accuracy with which this measurement can be made, three physicians independently measured the resting and squeezing ARAs of 22 women. The coefficient of variation and the kappa statistic were used to describe the degree of agreement among the three examiners. These analyses revealed poor agreement among examiners for all 22 patients taken as individuals, (ϰ≤0.40; mean coefficient of variation at rest=18 percent; mean coefficient during squeezing=21 percent). These results suggest that measurements of ARAs will vary among examiners for any particular patient, even though individual examiners may demonstrate consistency in recording ARA data. There is wide interobserver variation in the measurement of the ARA from lateral radiographs, making quantification an exercise of only limited clinical value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mahieu P, Pringot J, Bodard P. Defecography. I. Description of a new procedure and results in normal patients. Gastrointest Radiol 1984;9:247–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mahieu P, Pringot J, Bodard P. Defecography. II. Contribution to the diagnosis of defecation disorders. Gastrointest Radiol 1984;9:253–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ekberg O, Nylander G, Fort F-T. Defecography. Radiology 1985;155:45–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goei R, Van Engelshoven J, Schouten M, Baeten C, Stassen C. Anorectal function: defecographic measurement in asymptomatic subjects. Radiology 1989;173:137–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Skomorowska E, Hegedus V. Sex differences in anorectal angle and perineal descent. Gastrointest Radiol 1987;12:353–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shorvan PJ, McHugh F, Somers S, Stevenson GW. Defecographic findings in young, healthy volunteers. Gut 1987;28:A136l-2.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goei R. Anorectal function in patients with defecation disorders and asymptomatic subjects: evaluation with defecography. Radiology 1990;174:121–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bartolo DC, Roe AM, Locke-Edmunds JC, Virjae J, Mortensen NJ. Flap valve theory of anorectal continence. Br J Surg 1986;73:1012–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yoshioka K, Pinho M, Hyland G, Keighley MR. How reliable is measurement of the anorectal angle by videoproctography? Presented at the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 88th Annual Convention, Toronto, June 1988.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Ferrante, S.L., Perry, R.E., Schreiman, J.S. et al. The reproducibility of measuring the anorectal angle in defecography. Dis Colon Rectum 34, 51–55 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050207

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050207

Key words

Navigation