Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effect of stool consistency on rectal and neorectal emptying

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Although stool consistency is considered to be an important component of anorectal continence, its effect on rectal emptying has never been quantitated. In 12 healthy volunteers and 12 patients after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) (46±5 months after the operation; mean ± SEM), perfused anal manometry was performed; movements of the anorectal angle were quantitated scintigraphically; and rectal capacity and compliance were measured by air insufflation of an intrarectal balloon at three infusion rates. The efficiency of rectal evacuation of three consistencies (5 percent, liquid; 7.5 percent semisolid gel; 11.25 percent solid gel; w/w) of Tc99m labeled artificial stool (aluminum magnesium silicate gel) was quantitated by gamma camera imaging. No abnormalities of pelvic floor function were demonstrated in either controls or patients. The mean neorectal capacity and compliance of patients with IPAA did not differ from control, (capacity; IPAA: 215±22 mlvs. control; 245±29 ml; compliance; IPAA: 5.5±0.7 ml/cm H2Ovs. control; 6.6±0.7 ml/cm H2O;P>0.05). In controls, the percentage of the 7.5 percent consistency evacuated (81±5 percent, mean ± SEM) was significantly more than the percentage evacuation of either the 5 percent consistency (67±7 percent) or the 11.25 percent consistency (77±2 percent) (P<0.05). After IPAA, the mean overall percent evacuation of the three stool consistencies was significantly less than control (52±6 percent after IPAA; 75±5 percent control,P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in neorectal emptying between the liquid, the semisolid gel and the solid gel (56±6, 55±6, 51±9 percent, respectively,P>0.1). We concluded that in healthy subjects but not in patients after IPAA, stool consistency affected the efficiency of evacuation of enteric content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pemberton JH, Kelly KA. Achieving enteric continence: principles and application. Mayo Clin Proc 1986;61:586–99.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ihre T. Studies on anal function in continent and incontinent patients. Scan J Gastroenterol 1974;9(suppl 25):1–64.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bannister JJ, Davison P, Timms JM, Gibbons C, Read WW. Effect of stool size and consistency on defecation. Gut 1987;28:1246–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen Z, McLeod RS, Stern H, Grant D, Nordgren S. The pelvic pouch and ileoanal anastomosis procedure: surgical technique ad initial results. Am J Surg 1985;150:601–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nicholls RJ, Pezim ME. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a comparison of three reservoir designs. Br J Surg 1985;72:470–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Metcalf AM, Dozois RR, Kelly KA, Beart RW Jr, Wolff BG. Ileal “J” pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg 1985;202:735–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pemberton JH, Kelly KA, Beart RW Jr, Dozois RR, Wolff BG, Ilstrup DM. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis: long-term results. Ann Surg 1987;206:504–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heppell J, Kelly KA, Phillips SF, Beart RW Jr, Telander RL, Perrault J. Physiologic aspects of continence after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and endorectal ileo-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg 1982;195:435–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nasmyth DG, Johnston D, Godwin PG, Dixon MF, Smith A, Williams NS. Factors influencing bowel function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1986;73:469–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. O'Connell PR, Pemberton JH, Kelly KA. Motor function of the ileal J-pouch and its relation to clinical outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. World J Surg 1987;11:735–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stryker SJ, Kelly KA, Phillips SF, Dozois RR, Beart RW Jr. Anal and neorectal function after ileal pouchanal anastomosis. Ann Surg 1986;203:55–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Taylor BM, Beart RW Jr, Phillips SF. Longitudinal and radial variations of pressure in the human anal sphincter. Gastroenterology 1984;86:693–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Barkel DC, Pemberton JH, Pezim ME, Phillips SF, Kelly KA, Brown ML. Scintigraphic assessment of the anorectal angle in health and after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg 1988;208:42–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. O'Connell PR, Kelly KA, Brown ML. Scintigraphic assessment of neorectal motor function. J Nucl Med 1986;27:460–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Arhan P, Faverdin C, Persoz B,et al. Relationship between viscoelastic properties of the rectum and anal pressure in man. J Appl Physiol 1976;41:677–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Henry MM, Swash M. Faecal continence, defecation, and colorectal motility. A. Physiology of faecal continence and defecation. In: Henry MM, Swash M, eds. Coloproctocolectomy and the pelvic floor pathophysiology and management. London: Butterworths, 1985:42–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read in part at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Toronto, Canada, June 11 to 16, 1989.

Supported in part by USPHS Grants DK 37990, RR 585, and DK 34988 from the National Institutes of Health and the Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota.

About this article

Cite this article

Ambroze, W.L., Pemberton, J.H., Bell, A.M. et al. The effect of stool consistency on rectal and neorectal emptying. Dis Colon Rectum 34, 1–7 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050199

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050199

Key words

Navigation