Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

, Volume 34, Issue 12, pp 1120–1124 | Cite as

Single-visit screening and treatment of first-degree relatives

Colon cancer pilot study
  • G. W. Stevenson
  • C. Hernandez
Original Contributions
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

A pilot study has been carried out to evaluate three aspects of screening of first-degree relatives of patients with colon cancer in four Hamilton hospitals; yield of adenomas, feasibility of a one-visit approach to screening and treatment, and compliance. Protocol included flexible sigmoidoscopy after full bowel preparation, followed immediately by either therapeutic colonoscopy or diagnostic barium enema, depending on the flexible sigmoidoscopy findings. We found adenomas in 19 percent of 88 first-degree relatives, with a mean age of 52, compared with an expectation of 8 percent. The protocol was found to be acceptable to the relatives and workable for the various groups of physicians in three of four hospitals, despite many initial logistic difficulties. Numerous problems were encountered with compliance of referring physicians, index patients, relatives, and investigating physicians.

Key words

Colon cancer screening Radiology colonoscopy Sigmoidoscopy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Muto T, Bussey HJ, Morson BC. The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 1975;36:2251–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gilbertsen VA, McHugh R, Schuman L, Williams SE. The earlier detection of colorectal cancers: a preliminary report of the results of the occult blood study. Cancer 1980;45:2899–901.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Williams AR, Balasooriya BA, Day DW. Polyps and cancer of the large bowel: a necropsy study in Liverpool. Gut 1982;23:835–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Matsukawa M, Usui Y, Kobayashi S. Screening of colorectal early cancer by radiology. In: Maruyama M, Kimura K, eds. Review of clinical research in gastroenterology. Tokyo: Igaku Shoin, 1988:136–44.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gilbert DA, Hallstrohm AP, Shaneyfelt SL,et al. The national ASGE complications of colonoscopy survey. (Abstract.) Gastrointest Endosc 1984;30:156.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kronborg O, Fenger C, Jorgensen O. Follow-up after polypectomy. (Abstract.) In: 2nd International Conference on Gastrointestinal Cancer. Jerusalem, 1989:22.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rogers BH, Silvis S, Nebel OT,et al. Complications of flexible fibreoptic colonoscopy and polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1975;22:73–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Waye JD, Lewis BS, Frankel A, Geller SA. Small colon polyps. Am J Gastroenterol 1988;83:120–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stoltenberg PH, Kirtley DW, Culp KS, Le Sage GD, White JG. Are diminutive colorectal polyps (DCP) clinically significant? (Abstract.) Gastrointest Endosc 1988;34:172.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Winawer SJ. Detection and diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Cancer 1983;51:2519–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sherlock P, Lipkin M, Winawer SJ. The prevention of colon cancer. Am J Med 1980;68:917–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Winawer SJ, Fleisher M, Baldwin M, Sherlock P. Current status of fecal occult blood testing in screening for colorectal cancer. CA 1982;32:100–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Winawer SJ, Andrews M, Flehinger B, Sherlock P, Schottenfeld D, Miller DG. Progress report on controlled trial of fecal occult blood testing for the detection of colorectal neoplasia. Cancer 1980;45:2959–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Simon JB. Occult blood screening for colorectal carcinoma: a critical review. Gastroenterology 1985;88:820–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eddy DM, Nugent FW, Eddy FJ,et al. Screening for colorectal cancer in a high-risk population: results of a mathematical model. Gastroenterology 1987;92:682–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Winawer SJ, Sherlock P. Surveillance for colorectal cancer in average-risk patients, familial high-risk groups, and patients with adenomas. Cancer 1982;50:2609–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rozen P, Lynch HT, Figer A,et al. Familial colon cancer in the Tel-Aviv area and the influence of ethnic origin. Cancer 1987;60:2355–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rozen P, Fireman Z, Figer A, Legum C, Ron E, Lynch HT. Family history of colorectal cancer as a marker of potential malignancy within a screening program. Cancer 1987;60:248–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lovett E. Family studies in cancer of the colon and rectum. Br J Surg 1976;63:13–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rozen P, Fireman Z, Terdiman R, Hellerstein SM, Rattan J, Gilat T. Selective screening for colorectal tumours in the Tel-Aviv area: relevance of epidemiology and family history. Cancer 1981;47:827–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Love RR, Morrissey JF. Colonoscopy in asymptomatic individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer. Arch Intern Med 1984;144:2209–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kussin SZ, Lipkin M, Winawer SJ. State of the art: inherited colon cancer: clinical implications. Am J Gastroenterol 1979;72:448–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fitzsimons P, Shorvon P, Frost RA, Stevenson GW. A comparison of Golytely and standard preparation for barium enema. J Can Assoc Radiol 1987;38:109–12.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rodney WM, Randolph JF, Peterson DW. Cancellation rates and gas scores for air contrast barium enema immediately after 65 cm. flexible sigmoidoscopy: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Gastroenterol 1988;10:311–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Eckardt VF, Kanzler G, Willems D. Same day versus separate day sigmoidoscopy and double contrast barium enema: a randomized controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 1989;35:512–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Saito Y, Slezak P, Rubio C. The diagnostic value of combining flexible sigmoidoscopy and double contrast barium enema as a one stage procedure. Gastrointest Radiol 1989;14:357–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Johnson CD, Carlson HC, Taylor WF,et al. Barium enemas of carcinoma of the colon: sensitivity of double- and single contrast studies. AJR 1983;140:1143–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fork FT, Lindstrohm C, Ekelund GR. Reliability of routine double contrast examination (DCE) of the large bowel in polyp detection: a prospective clinical study. Gastrointest Radiol 1983;8:163–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fork FT. Reliability of routine double contrast examination of the large bowel: a prospective study of 2,590 patients. Gut 1983;24:672–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Waye J, Braunfeld S. Surveillance intervals after colonoscopic polypectomy. Endoscopy 1982;14:79–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Williams CB, Macrae FA, Bartram CI. A prospective study of diagnostic methods in adenoma follow up. Endoscopy 1982;14:74–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Leinicke J, Dodds W, Hogan W,et al. A comparison of colonoscopy and roentgenography for detecting polypoid lesions of the colon. Gastrointest Radiol 1977;2:125–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gelfand DW, Ott DJ. Single- vs double-contrast gastrointestinal studies: critical analysis of reported statistics. AJR 1981;137:523–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lehman GA, Buchner DM, Lappas JC. Anatomical extent of fibreoptic sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterology 1983;84:803–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Matek W, Guggenmoos-Holzmann I, Demling L. Follow-up of patients with colorectal carcinoma. Endoscopy 1985;17:175–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ransohoff DF, Lang CA, Sung Kuo H. Colonoscopic surveillance after polypectomy: considerations of cost effectiveness. Ann Intern Med 1991;114:177–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dunlop MG, Wyllie AH, Steel CM,et al. Linked DNA markers for presymptomatic diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis. Lancet 1991;337:313–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gilbertsen VA. Colon cancer screening: the Minnesota experience. Gastrointest Endosc 1980;26:31S-32S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Beggs I, Thomas BM. Diagnosis of carcinoma of the colon by barium enema. Clin Radiol 1983;34:423–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kelvin FM, Gardiner R, Vas W, Stevenson GW. Colorectal carcinoma missed on double contrast barium enema study: a problem in perception. AJR 1981;137:307–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Warden MJ, Petrelli NJ, Herrera L, Mittelman A. The role of colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:52–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Warden MJ, Petrelli NJ, Herrera L, Mittelman A. Endoscopy versus double contrast barium enema in the evaluation of patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 1988;155:224–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Colon & Rectal Surgeons 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. W. Stevenson
    • 1
  • C. Hernandez
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyChedoke-McMaster HospitalsHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations