Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anal encirclement with polypropylene mesh for rectal prolapse and incontinence

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Seventeen selected patients (mean age, 74 years)—14 with rectal prolapse and 3 with persisting anal incontinence after previous operations—underwent high anal encirclement with polypropylene mesh. There was no operative mortality. Prolapse recurred in 2 (15 percent) of the 13 patients followed up for 6 months or more (mean, 3.5 years). Three (27 percent) of the 11 patients with associated anal incontinence improved functionally, as did the three operated on for persisting incontinence, but only one patient regained normal continence. No breakage, cutting out, or infection related to the mesh was observed. Because of the risk of fecal impaction encountered in three of our patients, the procedure is not advocated for severely constipated patients. Despite the somewhat disappointing results regarding restoration of continence, we find this method useful in patients with rectal prolapse who are unfit for more extensive surgery, in controlling the prolapse to an acceptable degree.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Keighley MR, Fielding JW, Alexander-Williams J. Results of Marlex mesh abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse in 100 consecutive patients. Br J Surg 1983;70:229–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yoshioka K, Heyen F, Keighley MR. Functional results after posterior abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:835–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kirkman NF. Procidentia of the rectum: results of abdominal rectopexy in the elderly. Dis Colon Rectum 1975;18:470–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Houry S, Lechaux JP, Huguier M, Molkhou JM. Treatment of rectal prolapse by Delorme's operation. Int J Colorectal Dis 1987;2:149–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hunt TM, Fraser IA, Maybury NK. Treatment of rectal prolapse by sphincteric support using Silastic rods. Br J Surg 1985;72:491–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jackaman FR, Francis JN, Hopkinson BR. Silicone rubber band treatment of rectal prolapse. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1980;62:386–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramanujam PS, Venkatesh KS. Perineal excision of rectal prolapse with posterior levator ani repair in elderly high-risk patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:704–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Uhlig BE, Sullivan ES. The modified Delorme operation: its place in surgical treatment for massive rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1979;22:513–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Watts JD, Rothenberger DA, Buls JG, Goldberg SM, Nivatvongs S. The management of procidentia. 30 years' experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:96–102.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wyatt AP. Perineal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1981;68:717–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Friedman R, Muggia-Sulam M, Freund HR. Experience with the one-stage perineal repair of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:789–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Porter N. Collective results of operations for rectal prolapse. J R Soc Med 1962;55:1087–91.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Poole GV Jr, Pennell TC, Myers RT, Hightower F. Modified Thiersch operation for rectal prolapse: technique and results. Am Surg 1985;51:226–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Notaras MJ. The use of Mersilene mesh in rectal prolapse repair. J R Soc Med 1973;66:684–6.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lomas MI, Cooperman H. Correction of rectal procidentia by use of polypropylene mesh (Marlex). Dis Colon Rectum 1972;15:416–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Küpfer CA, Goligher JC. One hundred consecutive cases of complete prolapse of the rectum treated by operation. Br J Surg 1970;57:481–7.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hopkinson BR, Hardman J. Silicone rubber perianal suture for rectal prolapse. J R Soc Med 1973;66:1095–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nay HR, Blair CR. Perineal surgical repair of rectal prolapse. Am J Surg 1972;123:577–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Altemeier WA, Culbertson WR, Schowengerdt C, Hunt J. Nineteen years' experience with the onestage perineal repair of rectal prolapse. Ann Surg 1971;173:993–1006.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Prasad ML, Pearl RK, Abcarian H, Orsay CP, Nelson RL. Perineal proctectomy, posterior rectopexy, and postanal levator repair for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:547–52.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rogers J, Jeffery PJ. Postanal repair and intersphincteric Ivalon sponge rectopexy for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1987;74:384–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Husa A, Sainio P, v Smitten K. Abdominal rectopexy and sigmoid resection (Frykman-Goldberg operation) for rectal prolapse. Acta Chir Scand 1988;154:221–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Sainio, A.P., Halme, L.E. & Husa, A.I. Anal encirclement with polypropylene mesh for rectal prolapse and incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 34, 905–908 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02049706

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02049706

Key words

Navigation