Skip to main content
Log in

Concepts of administrative effectiveness and the evaluation of school administrators

  • Published:
Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bolam, R. (1990). Principal evaluation and appraisal in England. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.

  • BrandtR.M. (1990).Incentive pay and career ladders for today's teachers. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ByhamW.C. & ThorntonG.C. (1986). Assessment centers. In R.A.Berk (Ed.),Performance assessment. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ChubbJ.E. & MoeT.M. (1990).Politics, markets & America's schools. Washintong, DC: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connecticut Principals' Academy, (1990). A guide to the process of evaluating school principals. East Lyme, CT: Connecticut Principals' Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • DukeD.L. (1986) The aesthetics of leadership.Educational Administration Quarterly, 21, 7–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • DukeD.L. & ImberM. (1985). Should principals be required to be effective?School Organization, 5, 125–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • EbmeierH. (1991). The development and field test of an instrument for client-based principal formative evaluation.Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 4, 245–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • ErlandsonD.A. & HoyleJ.R. (1991). Administrator performance evaluation: A comparison of two measures in the Management Profile.Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 4, 279–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • GinsbergR. & BerryB. (1990). The folklore of principal evaluation.Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 3, 205–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • LewisA. (1989).Restructuring america's schools. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.

    Google Scholar 

  • MachiavelliN. (1961).The prince. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • NathanB.R. & CascioW.F. (1986). Introduction: Technical and legal standards. In R.A.Berk (Ed.),Performance assessment. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • PetersonK.D. (1984). Mechanisms of administrative control over managers in educational organizations.Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 573–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • PitnerN.J. (1988). The study of administrator effects and effectiveness. In N.J.Boyan (Ed.),Handbook of research on educational administration. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • ScheinE. (1985).Organization culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • SeligmanM.E.P. (1991).Learned optimism. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • SizerT.R. (1992).Horace's schools. New York: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • SokolM. & OresickR. (1986). Managerial performance appraisal. In R.A.Berk (Ed.),Performance assessment. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • StoneD.A. (1988).Policy Paradox and Political Reason. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • StufflebeamD.L. (1988).The personnel evaluation standards. Report by the joint committee on standards for educational evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • TyackD. & HansotE. (1982).Managers of virture. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duke, D.L. Concepts of administrative effectiveness and the evaluation of school administrators. J Pers Eval Educ 6, 103–121 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02049635

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02049635

Keywords

Navigation