Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanism of sphincter impairment following low anterior resection

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

It has been postulated that reduction in anal resting pressure following low anterior resection is due to intraoperative injury to the internal anal sphincter during transanal passage of the stapling device or damage to its nerve supply in the course of rectal mobilization. The aim of this study was to assess the relative importance of either mechanism. Fourteen dogs had a standard segment of colon and distal rectum excised. Colorectal reconstruction was performed using either a low stapled EEA® (U.S. Surgical Corporation, Norwalk, CT) colorectal anastomosis (n=7) or a handsewn anastomosis (n=7). Anorectal manometry was performed preoperatively and again on the 10th postoperative day. Resting anal pressure was significantly reduced after EEA® anastomosis (mean±SEM: before, 49±3 mm Hg; after, 20±4 mm Hg; P <0.001) and handsewn anastomosis (mean±SEM: before, 46±4 mm Hg; after, 35±4 mm Hg; P<0.01). Postoperative resting pressures were also significantly reduced (P<0.05) following EEA® anastomosis when compared with the handsewn group. This study suggests that damage to the innervation of the internal anal sphincter during rectal mobilization and further direct injury to the sphincter during transanal instrumentation both contribute to the fall in anal resting pressure observed following low anterior resection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kirwan WO, O'Riordan MG, Waldron R. Declining indications for abdominoperineal resection. Br J Surg 1989;76:1061–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Williams NS, Johnston D. The quality of life after rectal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1983;70:460–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McDonald PJ, Heald RJ. A survey of postoperative function after rectal anastomosis with circular stapling devices. Br J Surg 1983;70:727–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Varma JS, Smith AN. Anorectal function following coloanal sleeve anastomosis for radiation injury to the rectum. Br J Surg 1986;73:285–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Horgan PG, O'Connoll PR, Shinkwin CA, Kirwan WO. Effect of anterior resection on anal sphincter function. Br J Surg 1989;76:783–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor BM, Beart RW, Phillips SF. Longitudinal and radial variations of pressure in the human anal sphincter. Gastroenterology 1984;86:693–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Williams NS, Price R, Johnston D. The long term effect of sphincter preserving operations for rectal carcinoma on the function of the anal sphincter in man. Br J Surg 1980;67:203–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Iwai N, Hasimoto K, Yamane T,et al. Physiologic status of the anorectum following sphincter-saving resection of carcinoma of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:652–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Olsen J, Mortensen PE, Christianson J,et al. Anal sphincter function after treatment of fissure-in-ano by lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy versus anal dilatation. A randomized study. Int J Colorectal Dis 1987;2:155–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Creve U, Huben's A. The effect of Lord's procedure on anal pressure. Dis Colon Rectum 1979;22:483–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read at the meeting of The Surgical Research Society (England), July 16, 1990. Proceedings published in Br J Surg 1990;77: 1421.

This study was carried out entirely in the University Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland.

About this article

Cite this article

Molloy, R.G., Moran, K.T., Coulter, J. et al. Mechanism of sphincter impairment following low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 35, 462–464 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02049403

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02049403

Key words

Navigation