Skip to main content
Log in

Advances in rectal cancer surgery

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: We discuss our experience in radical rectal cancer surgery and critically review the results of the current literature. In particular, the importance of distal clearance, total excision of the mesorectum, and pelvic lymphadenectomy is stressed. METHODS AND RESULTS: The rationale for determining a pelvic lymphadenectomy is identified in the high percentage (20 percent) of lateral endopelvic metastatic nodes demonstrated in cases of extraperitoneal rectal cancers. The results after pelvic lymphadenectomy and the eventual complications are observed. The autonomic nerve-sparing procedure is described and the preliminary results, with a decreased rate of urinary and sexual sequelae, are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that, in cases of an advanced rectal cancer, radical surgery, if associated with the nervesparing technique, can improve survival without affecting the incidence of major complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Church JM, Raudikivi PJ, Mill BL. The surgical anatomy of the rectum—a review with particular reference to the hazards of rectal mobilisation. Int J Colorectal Dis 1987;2:158–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pollet WG, Nicholls RJ. The relationship between the extent of distal clearance and survival and local recurrence rates after curative anterior resection for carcinoma of the rectum. Ann Surg 1983;198:159–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams NS, Dixon MF, Johnston D. Reappraisal of the 5 centimeter rule of distal excision for carcinoma of the rectum: study of distal intramural spread and of patients' survival. Br J Surg 1983;70:150–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Di Matteo G, Cancrini A Jr, Boemi L, Mascagni D, Perri FA. The role of lymphadenectomy in rectal cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 1989;8:26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Enker WE, Laffer VT, Block GE. Enhanced survival of patients with colon and rectal cancer is based on wide anatomic resection. Ann Surg 1979;190:350–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 1982;69:613–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Heald RJ, Ryall RH. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1986;1:1479–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hojo K, Koyama Y, Moriya Y. Lymphatic spread and its prognostic value in patients with rectal cancer. Ann J Surg 1982;144:350–4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mascagni D, Hojo K, Moriya Y, Sugihara K, Di Matteo G. Pattern of lymph node metastasis from low rectal cancer. (Meeting abstr.) Dis Colon Rectum 1992;5:P6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mc AnenaOJ Heald RJ, Lockhart-Mummery MF. Operative and functional results of total mesorectal excision with ultra-low anterior resection in the management of carcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990;170:517–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Moriya Y, Hojo K, Sawada T, Koyama Y. Significance of lateral node dissection for advanced rectal carcinoma at or below the peritoneal reflection. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:307–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Northover JM. The dissection in anterior resection for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 1989;4:134–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schardey HM. Intraluminal vs. extraluminal local recurrence of colo-rectal carcinoma. Absence of predisposing histopathological factors after RO resection. ACA Suppl 1991;93:21–2.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Feil W, Wunderlich M, Kovats E, Neuhold N, Schemper M, Wenzl E, Schiessel R. Rectal cancer: factors influencing the development of local recurrence after radical anterior resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 1988;3:195–200.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Miholic J, Loimer L, End A, Moeschl P, Wolner E. Risk factors for pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer. ACA Suppl 1991;93:22.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cawthorn SJ, Parums DV, Gibbs NM,et al. Extent of mesorectal spread and involvement of lateral resection margin as prognostic factor after surgery for rectal cancer. Lancet 1990;335:1055–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Anderberg B, Enblad P, Sjodahl R, Wetterfors J. The EEA-stapling device in anterior resection for carcinoma of the rectum. Acta Chir Scand 1983;149:99–103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sauer I, Bacon HE. Influence of lateral spread of cancer of the rectum on radicability of operation and prognosis. Am J Surg 1951;81:111–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goligher JC. Surgery of anus, rectum, and colon. 4th ed. London: Bailiere Tindall, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Di Matteo G, Mascagni D, Tarroni D. Radical surgery for rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 1991;2(Suppl):32–5.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hojo K, Vernava AM, Sugihara K, Katumata K. Preservation of urine voiding and sexual function after rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:532–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Phillips RK, Hittinger R, Blesovsky L, Fry JS, Fielding LP. Local recurrence following “curative” surgery for large bowel cancer: II. The rectum and rectosigmoid. Br J Surg 1984;71:17–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Di Matteo, G., Mascagni, D., Lentini, A. et al. Advances in rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 37 (Suppl 2), S50–S53 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02048432

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02048432

Key words

Navigation