Advertisement

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

, Volume 39, Issue 1, pp 30–36 | Cite as

Colorectal stapled anastomoses

Experiences and results
  • Olaf Hansen
  • Wolfgang Schwenk
  • H. P. Hucke
  • Wolfgang Stock
Original Contributions

Abstract

PURPOSE: Stapled anastomoses are currently an established technique in colorectal surgery. Larger series about the use of circular staplers in rectal anastomoses within daily clinical routine are rare. METHODS: We evaluated the morbidity, clinical leakage rate, and mortality in an unselected population of a teaching hospital after elective, left-sided colorectal resections with stapled rectal anastomoses. In the course of our study, manually sewn rectal anastomoses were not performed. All anastomoses were tested intraoperatively by instillation of liquid. RESULTS: A total of 615 elective colorectal resections with stapled rectal anastomoses was performed by 18 surgeons from 1984 to 1993. A protective colostomy was created in 2.9 percent (n=16) of all patients. Clinical anastomotic leakage occurred in nine patients (1.5 percent). The mortality rate was 1 percent (n=6). CONCLUSION: Use of the stapling technique facilitates the performance of anastomoses, particularly in regions with difficult anatomy. The rate of local complications is low, and protective colostomy can thus be dispensed with in most cases.

Key words

Stapler Leakage rate Colorectal resection Protective colostomy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Beart RW Jr, Kelly KA. Randomized prospective evaluation of the EEA stapler for colorectal anastomoses. Am J Surg 1981;141:143–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brennan SS, Pickford IR, Evans M, Pollock AV. Staples or sutures for colonic anastomoses—a controlled clinical trial. Br J Surg 1982;69:722–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Everett WG, Friend PJ, Forty J. Comparison of stapled and handsuture for leftside large bowel anastomosis. Br J Surg 1986;73:345–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McGinn FP, Gartell PC, Clifford PC, Brunton FJ. Staples or sutures for low colorectal anastomoses: a prospective randomized trial. Br J Surg 1985;72:603–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thiede A, Jostarndt L, Schröder D, Schubert G, Hamelmann H. Prospective and controlled studies in colorectal surgery: comparison of hand-sutured and stapled rectal anastomoses. In: Ravitch MM, Steichen FM, eds. Principles and practice of surgical stapling. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1987:432–59.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goligher JC. Sphinktererhaltende resektion bei der radikalen behandlung des karzinoms im mittleren rektum. In: Ulrich B, Winter J, eds. Klammernahttechnik in thorax und abdomen. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke Verlag, 1986:149–58.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Steichen FM. Sequential anastomosis and resection in operations on the gastrointestinal tract. In: Ravitch MM, Steichen FM, eds. Principles and practice of surgical stapling. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1987:31–46.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kantartzis M, Lersmacher J, Ulatowski L, Usmiani J. Senkt die retroperitonealisierung der anastomosen bei linksseitigen dickdarmresektionen die postoperative letalität? Langenbecks Arch Chir 1988;373:143–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kessler H, Hermanek P Jr, Wiebelt H. Operative mortality in carcinoma of the rectum. Int J Colorectal Dis 1993;8:158–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stock W, Hirt JH, Schaal KP, Pichlmaier H. Die präoperative darmkeimverminderung durch orthograde darmspülung. Chirurg 1977;48:161–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stock W, Weber M, Doht R. Perioperative hochkalorische ernährung mit dem zentralen venenkatheter. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1985;110:943–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Friend PJ, Scott R, Everett WG, Scott IH. Stapled or suturing for anastomoses of the left side of large intestine. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990;171:373–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Holdsworth PJ, Heald RJ. Risk of peritonitis and fatal septicaemia and the need to defunction the low anastomoses. Br J Surg 1991;78:196–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dixon AR, Maxwell WA, Holmes JT. Carcinoma of the rectum: a 10-year experience. Br J Surg 1991;78:308–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gillen P, Peel AL. Comparison of the mortality, morbidity and incidence of local recurrence in patients with rectal cancer treated by either stapled anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection. Br J Surg 1986;73:339–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wehrli H, Koch R, Akovbiantz A. Erfahrungen mit 169 kolorektalen maschinellen anastomosen (1981–1984). Helv Chir Acta 1988;55:649–54.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kennedy HL, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM,et al. Colocolostomy and coloproctostomy utilizing the circular intraluminal stapling devices. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:145–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kyzer S, Gordon PH. Experience with the use of the circular stapler in rectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:696–706.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Giercksky KE, Danielsen s, Revhaug A. Prediction of postoperative complications. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1988;149:69–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Greenburg G, Saik RP, Pridham D. Influence of age on mortality of colon surgery. Am J Surg 1985;150:65–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Löhde E, Scholz L, Gemperle A,et al. Vergleichsanalyse von mezlozillin/metronidazol und amoxicillin/clavulansäure als “one shot”-antibiotikaprophylaxe bei kolorektalen eingriffen. Zentralbl Chir 1992;117:325–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Trollope ML, Cohen RG, Lee RH, Cannon WB, Marzoni FA, Cressman RD. A 7 year experience with low anterior sigmoid resections using the EEA stapler. Am J Surg 1986;152:11–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Varma JS, Chan AC, Li MK, Li AK. Low anterior resection of the rectum using a double stapled technique. Br J Surg 1990;77:888–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Griffen FD, Knight CD, Whitaker JM, Knight CD Jr. The double stapled technique for low anterior resection. Ann Surg 1990;211:745–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Smith LE. Anastomosis with EEA stapler after anterior colonic resection. Symposium: the use and misuse of staples in colonic surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:236–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Antonsen HK, Kronborg O. Early complications after low anterior resection for rectal cancer using the EEA 228 stapling device: a prospective trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:579–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fazio VW. Cancer of the rectum—sphincter saving operation. Surg Clin North Am 1988;68:1367–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gordon PH, Vasilevsky CA. Experience with stapler in rectal surgery. Surg Clin North Am 1984;64:555–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Heald RJ, Chir M. Low stapled anastomosis: a means of improving pelvic dissection technique in rectal cancer surgery. In: Ravitch MM, Steichen FM, eds. Principles and practice of surgical stapling. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1987:499–511.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Polglase AL. Anterior resection for carcinoma of the rectum. In: Ravitch MM, Steichen FM, eds. Principles and practice of surgical stapling. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1987:373–87.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Beard JD, Nicholson ML, Sayers RD, Lloyd D, Everson NW. Intraoperative air testing of colorectal anastomoses: a prospective, randomized trial. Br J Surg 1990;77:1095–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Winkler R. Das colorektale carcinom. Chirurg 1981;52:201–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bozzetti F, Nava M, Bufalino R,et al. Early local complications following colostomy closure in cancer patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:25–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cutait DE, Cutait R. Stapled anterior resection of the rectum. In: Ravitch MM, Steichen FM, eds. Principles and practice of surgical stapling. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1987:388–401.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fegiz G, Angelini L, Bezzi M. Rectal cancer: restorative surgery with the EEA stapled device. Int Surg 1983;68:13–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gordon PH, Dalrymple S. The use of staples for reconstruction after colonic and rectal surgery. In: Ravitch MM, Steichen FM, eds. Principles and practice of surgical stapling. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1987:402–31.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Leber K, Junghanns K. Die apparative anteriore rektumresektion mit EEA, ILS und sptu als standardeingriff an einer Weiterbildungsklinik. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl II 1987;372:830.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Steinhagen RM, Weakley FL. Anastomosis to the rectum: operative experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:105–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Dickson GH. Some clinical and technical aspects of circular anastomoses of rectum and oesophagus. Ann Surg 1989;71:59–63.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olaf Hansen
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Schwenk
    • 1
  • H. P. Hucke
    • 2
  • Wolfgang Stock
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryMarien-Hospital DüsseldorfDusseldorfGermany
  2. 2.Society for applied statistics and data-analysisNeussGermany

Personalised recommendations