Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 278–287 | Cite as

Intra-abdominal “Reservoir” in patients with permanent ileostomy

Preliminary observations on a procedure resulting in fecal “Continence” in five ileostomy patients
  • Nils G. Kock
Classic Article

Summary

Preliminary experience with a new type of ileostomy provided with an intraperitoneal reservoir is presented.

By splitting the distal part of the ileum at its antimesenteric border and folding the split intestine twice, a bladder-like container is formed by suturing the edges of the intestine. In this type of reservoir the motor activity in the different parts of the intestine counteract each other and no pressure waves appear on filling the reservoir. The outlet of the reservoir passes obliquely through the rectus muscle which closes the outlet so that no involuntary flow through the ileostomy is possible, either during rest or during coughing or straining. The capacity of the reservoir is between 300 and 600 ml, depending on the length of intestine used for the construction of the reservoir.

To date, five patients have been provided with this type of ileostomy after panproctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis, and the results obtained from these patients are very encouraging. The patients empty their reservoir one to four times every 24 hours by inserting a plastic tube through the ileostomy. There is no involuntary flow of intestinal content through the ileostomy.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Watts, J. McK.; de Dombal, F.T.; and Goligher, J.C.: Long-Term Complications and Prognosis Following Major Surgery for Ulcerative Colitis,Brit J Surg 53:1014–1022 (Dec) 1966.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Biermann, H.; Tocker, A.; and Tocker, L.: Statistical Survey of Problems in Patients With Colostomy or Ileostomy.Amer J Surg 112:647–650 (Nov) 1966.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    di Zerega, D.,et al: Ileostomy Problems,J Kansas Med Soc 68:40–44 (Feb) 1967.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Madding, G.F.; Kennedy, P.A.; and McLaughlin, R.T.: Clinical Use of Antiperistaltic Bowel Segments,Ann Surg 161:601–604 (April) 1965.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ellis, H., and Coll, J.: Antiperistaltic Segment for Profuse Ileostomy Diarrhea,Brit Med J 1:556–557 (March) 1968.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Craft, J. L., and Venables, C.W.: Antiperistaltic Segment of Jejunum for Persistent Diarrhea Following Vagotomy,Ann Surg 167:282–286 (Feb) 1968.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ekman, H.,et al: The Functional Behavior of Different Types of Intestinal Urinary Bladder Substitutes, 13th Congress of the International Urological Society, London, Sept 1964, vol 2, pp 213–217.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nils G. Kock
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgery 1Sahlgrenska Sjukhuset, University of GoteborgGoteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations