Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopic-assisted intestinal resection for Crohn's disease

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: The inflammatory process associated with Crohn's disease often makes dissection difficult, even in “open” surgery. This study was undertaken to determine if dissection and resection could be performed laparoscopically and whether it would benefit this group of patients. METHODS: Between November 1992 and November 1994, laparoscopic-assisted intestinal resection was attempted in 18 patients with Crohn's disease and was successfully completed in 14. One patient had ileal disease, requiring ileal resection with ileoileal anastomosis. The remainder had disease requiring ileocolic resections. Muscle-splitting incisions averaging 5 cm in length were made to facilitate removal of specimens. RESULTS: Commencement of oral alimentation was possible at an average of 3.6 (range, 1–7) days postoperatively. Discharge occurred at an average of 6.6 (range, 4–9) postoperative days. In comparison, 14 patients operated on by the authors for the same disease in the open manner during the past six months stayed an average of 8.5 (range, 5–14) postoperative days. Postoperative complications were minimal. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of this initial study, it appears that laparoscopic-assisted intestinal resection can be readily performed in patients with Crohn's disease. In our early experience, we have found that laparoscopic mobilization and resection may be difficult or impossible in patients with large fixed masses, multiple complex fistulas, or recurrent Crohn's disease. Extraction incisions are frequently so large in these patients that they do not derive the same benefits from laparoscopic surgery that are enjoyed by patients without these findings. Most patients having laparoscopic resections eat earlier, may require fewer narcotics, and are able to be discharged from the hospital an average of two days earlier than patients operated on in an open manner. In addition, it appears that laparoscopic-assisted intestinal resection results in a shorter, easier convalescence and an earlier return to full activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1991;1:144–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Saclarides TJ, Ko ST, Airan M, Dillon C, Franklin J. Laparoscopic removal of a large colonic lipoma: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:1027–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schlinkert RT. Laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:1030–1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cooperman AM, Katz V, Zimmon D, Botero G. Laparoscopic colon resection: a case report. J Laparoendosc Surg 1991;1:221–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Falk PM, Beart RW Jr, Wexner SD,et al. Laparoscopic colectomy: a critical appraisal. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:28–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Monson JR, Darzi A, Carey PD, Guillou PJ. Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy in an unselected group of patients. Lancet 1992;340:831–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Phillips EH, Franklin M, Carroll BJ, Fallas MJ, Ramos R, Rosenthal D. Laparoscopic colectomy. Ann Surg 1992;216:703–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Plasencia G, Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Viamonte M III. Laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid colectomy and low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:829–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Scoggin SD, Frazee RC, Snyder SK,et al. Laparoscopic-assisted bowel surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:747–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ramos JM, Gupta S, Anthone GJ, Ortega AE, Simons AJ, Beart RW Jr. Laparoscopy and colon cancer: is the port site at risk? A preliminary report. Arch Surg 1994;129:897–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alexander RJ, Jaques BC, Mitchell KG. Laparoscopically assisted colectomy and wound recurrence. Lancet 1993;341:249–50.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Walsh DC, Wattchow DA, Wilson TG. Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic resection of malignancy. Aust N Z J Surg 1993;63:563–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fusco MA, Paluzzi MW. Abdominal wall recurrence after laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for adenocarcinoma of the colon: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:858–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cirocco WC, Schwartzman A, Golub RW. Abdominal wall recurrence after laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer. Surgery 1994;116:842–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Beart RW Jr. Laparoscopic colectomy: status of the art. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37(Suppl):S47–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wexner SD, Johansen OB. Laparoscopic bowel resection: advantages and limitations. Ann Med 1992;24:105–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wexner SD, Johansen OB, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman DG. Laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy: a prospective trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:651–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD. Laparoscopic colon resection. Perspect Colon Rectal Surg 1992;5:79–97.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vara-Thorbeck C, Garcia-Caballero M, Salvi M, Gutstein D,et al. Indications and advantages of laparoscopy-assisted colon resection for carcinoma in elderly patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1994;4:110–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Bauer, J.J., Harris, M.T., Grumbach, N.M. et al. Laparoscopic-assisted intestinal resection for Crohn's disease. Dis Colon Rectum 38, 712–715 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02048027

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02048027

Key words

Navigation