Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Are intersecting staple lines a hazard in intestinal anastomosis?

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

To determine the safety of intersecting staple lines, 22 pigs were operated upon with a functional end-to-end enteroanastomosis 40 cm distal to the ligament of Treitz using linear stapling devices. The procedure was repeated on the colon, where a colocolostomy was created. The blood flow at intersecting staple lines and single-row staple lines for each anastomosis was studied with the reference organ method 24 hours after the first operation. The purpose was to evaluate whether there is a reduction in blood flow at the site of intersecting staple lines, causing an increased risk for anastomotic leakage. The reduction in mean blood flow in crossing compared with noncrossing staple lines was 6 percent (−5–17 percent) for small bowel anastomoses and 7 percent (−6–19 percent) for colonic anastomoses. An equivalence test showed that, if a reduction in blood flow exists between crossing and noncrossing staple lines, it is most likely less than 30 percent (P <0.001) for both small bowel and colonic anastomoses. This experimental study demonstrates that intersecting staple lines in small bowel and colonic anastomoses do not reduce anastomotic blood flow to a dangerous level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ballantyne GH. The experimental basis of intestinal suturing: effect of surgical technique, inflammation, and infection on enteric wound healing. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:61–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ballantyne GH. Intestinal suturing: review of the experimental foundations for traditional doctrines. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:836–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goligher JC, Lee PW, Simpkins KC, Lintott DJ. A controlled comparison of one- and two-layer techniques of suture for high and low colorectal anastomoses. Br J Surg 1977;64:609–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Harder F, Vogelbach P. Single-layer end-on continuous suture of colonic anastomoses. Am J Surg 1988;155:611–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Corman ML, Prager ED, Hardy TG Jr, Bubrick MP, Valtrac (BAR) Study Group. Comparison of the Valtrac biofragmentable anastomosis ring with conventional suture and stapled anastomosis in colon surgery: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:183–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Waxman BP, Douglas MC, McLeish AR. Failure of staple closure and large bowel anastomotic leakage. Med J Aust 1986;144:89–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Antonsen HK, Kronborg O. Early complications after low anterior resection for rectal cancer using the EEA stapling device. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:579–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hultén L. Inadequate local blood supply—a common cause of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection? Theor Surg 1990;5:16–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gritsman JJ. Mechanical suture by Soviet apparatus in gastric resection: use in 4,000 operations. Surgery 1966;59:663–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ravitch MM, Brolin R, Kolter J, Yap S. Studies in the healing of intestinal anastomoses. World J Surg 1981;5:627–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ravitch MM. Intersecting staple lines in intestinal anastomoses. Surgery 1985;97:8–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chung RS. Blood flow in colonic anastomoses. Effect of stapling and suturing. Ann Surg 1987;206:335–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Walther BS, Zilling T, Johnsson F, Staël von Holstein C, Joelsson B. Total gastrectomy and oesophagojejunostomy with linear stapling devices. Br J Surg 1989;76:909–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bartrum RJ, Berkowitz DM, Hollenberg NK. A simple radioactive microsphere method for measuring regional flow and cardiac output. Invest Radiol 1974;9:126–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Com-Nougue C, Rodary C. Revue des procedures statistiques pour mettre en evidence l'equivalence de deux traitments. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 1987;35:416–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Graffner H, Andersson L, Löwenhielm P, Walther B. The healing process of anastomoses of the colon: a comparative study using single, double-layer or stapled anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:767–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Graffner H, Löwenhielm P, Walther B. The healing process in high and low anterior resection of the rectum: a comparative study in the pig, using stapling devices. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:772–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Haglund U, Abe T, Åhren C, Braide I, Lundgren O. The intestinal mucosal lesions in shock. I. Studies on the pathogenesis. Eur Surg Res 1976;8:435–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Buckberg GD, Luck JC, Payne DB, Hoffman JI, Archie JP, Fixler DE. Some sources of error in measuring regional blood flow with radioactive microspheres. J Appl Physiol 1971;31:598–604.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study was supported by grants from Johnson & Johnson Sweden AB and The Medical Faculty, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

About this article

Cite this article

Zilling, T., Walther, B.S. Are intersecting staple lines a hazard in intestinal anastomosis?. Dis Colon Rectum 35, 892–896 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02047879

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02047879

Key words

Navigation