Treatment of rectal prolapse in the elderly by perineal rectosigmoidectomy
The results and complications of perineal rectosigmoidectomy for complete rectal prolapse in 114 patients have been reviewed. Most patients were elderly and high risk by virtue of other concurrent medical conditions. Fourteen patients (12 percent) developed significant postoperative complications. Hospital stay was short (median, four days). Ten patients were lost to follow-up. The remaining 104 patients were followed for 3 to 90 months. Eleven patients (10 percent) developed recurrent fullthickness rectal prolapse; six of them underwent repeat perineal rectosigmoidectomy. Sixty-seven patients had fecal incontinence prior to surgery. Eleven patients underwent concomitant levatoroplasty; 10 of them either improved or regained full continence of feces postoperatively. Twenty-six of the 56 patients who underwent perineal rectosigmoidectomy alone improved or regained full continence. Rectal prolapse can be successfully treated by perineal rectosigmoidectomy in elderly, highrisk patients with minimal morbidity. Levatoroplasty dramatically improves fecal incontinence occurring in association with rectal prolapse.
KeywordsRectal prolapse Incontinence Perineal repair Rectosigmoidectomy Levatoroplasty
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Hughes ES. Discussion on rectal prolapse. J R Soc Med 1949;42:1007–11.Google Scholar
- 2.Porter N. Collective results of operations for rectal prolapse. J R Soc Med 1962;55:1087–91.Google Scholar
- 3.Vermeulen FD, Nivatvongs S, Fang DT,et al. A technique for perineal rectosigmoidectomy using autosuture devices. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1983;156:85–6.Google Scholar
- 14.Meyers JO, Wong WD, Rothenberger DA, Jensen LL, Goldberg SM. Rectal prolapse in males—implications for management (abstr). Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:P28.Google Scholar