Predicting lymph node metastases in rectal cancer
For properly selected rectal cancers, local excision is a sphincter-saving alternative to abdominoperineal resection. If histologic assessment of a locally excised tumor reveals ominous features, further treatment with radical resection or irradiation may be necessary to treat potential lymph node metastases. PURPOSE: We wished to determine which features, if any, were predictors of nodal metastases. METHODS: Nine histologic and morphologic features of 62 radically excised rectal cancers were reviewed to determine which factors, if any, were associated with nodal disease. RESULTS: Using a chi-squared analysis, we found worsening differentiation (P=0.0001), increasing depth of penetration (P=0.026), a microtubular configuration of 20 percent or more (P=0.023), and the presence of venous (P=0.001) or perineural invasion (P=0.002) to significantly influence nodal disease. Lymphatic invasion was witnessed too infrequently to determine significance but, when present, was associated with nodal metastases in every case. Exophytic tumor morphology, mitotic count, and tumor size were not significant predictors. An analysis of variables determined that, of all factors or combination of factors examined, Broder's classification was the strongest predictor of nodal disease. CONCLUSIONS: If a rectal cancer is accessible and of small size to facilitate local excision, an in-depth histologic assessment is needed to determine if nodal metastases are likely on a statistical basis.
Key wordsRectal cancer Lymph node metastases Local excision
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Miles WE. A method of performing abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and the terminal portion of the pelvic colon. Lancet 1908;2:1812–3.Google Scholar
- 5.Killingback MJ. Indications for local excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1985;72(Suppl P):54–6.Google Scholar
- 6.Morson BC. Histologic criteria for local excision. Br J Surg 1985;72(Suppl P):S53–4.Google Scholar
- 13.Snyder SK. Surgical treatment of low-lying carcinoma of the rectum. Geriatr Clin North Am 1985;1:485–92.Google Scholar