Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 52–57 | Cite as

Predicting lymph node metastases in rectal cancer

  • T. J. Saclarides
  • A. K. Bhattacharyya
  • C. Britton-Kuzel
  • D. Szeluga
  • S. G. Economou
Original Contributions
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

For properly selected rectal cancers, local excision is a sphincter-saving alternative to abdominoperineal resection. If histologic assessment of a locally excised tumor reveals ominous features, further treatment with radical resection or irradiation may be necessary to treat potential lymph node metastases. PURPOSE: We wished to determine which features, if any, were predictors of nodal metastases. METHODS: Nine histologic and morphologic features of 62 radically excised rectal cancers were reviewed to determine which factors, if any, were associated with nodal disease. RESULTS: Using a chi-squared analysis, we found worsening differentiation (P=0.0001), increasing depth of penetration (P=0.026), a microtubular configuration of 20 percent or more (P=0.023), and the presence of venous (P=0.001) or perineural invasion (P=0.002) to significantly influence nodal disease. Lymphatic invasion was witnessed too infrequently to determine significance but, when present, was associated with nodal metastases in every case. Exophytic tumor morphology, mitotic count, and tumor size were not significant predictors. An analysis of variables determined that, of all factors or combination of factors examined, Broder's classification was the strongest predictor of nodal disease. CONCLUSIONS: If a rectal cancer is accessible and of small size to facilitate local excision, an in-depth histologic assessment is needed to determine if nodal metastases are likely on a statistical basis.

Key words

Rectal cancer Lymph node metastases Local excision 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Miles WE. A method of performing abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and the terminal portion of the pelvic colon. Lancet 1908;2:1812–3.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sweeney JL, Ritchie JK, Hawley PR. Resection and sutured peranal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:103–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morodijm T, Isomoto H, Shirouzu K,et al. An index for estimating the probability of lymph node metastasis in rectal cancers. Lymph node metastasis and the histopathology of actively invasive regions of cancer. Cancer 1989;63:539–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Whiteway J, Nicholls RJ, Morson BC. The role of surgical local excision in the treatment of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1985;72:694–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Killingback MJ. Indications for local excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1985;72(Suppl P):54–6.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morson BC. Histologic criteria for local excision. Br J Surg 1985;72(Suppl P):S53–4.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gerard A, Pector JC, Ferreira J. Local excision as conservative treatment for small rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 1989;15:544–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Decosse JJ, Wong RJ, Quan SH. Conservative treatment of distal rectal cancer by local excision. Cancer 1989;63:219–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heberer C, Denecke H, Demmel N,et al. Local procedures in the management of rectal cancer. World J Surg 1987;11:499–503.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cuthbertson AM, Simpson R. Curative local excision of rectal adenocarcinoma. Aust N Z J Surg 1986;56:229–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Crigg M, McDermott FT, Pihl EA,et al. Curative local excision in the management of carcinoma of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:81–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hegar TH, Gall FP, Hermanek P. Local excision of cancer of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:149–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Snyder SK. Surgical treatment of low-lying carcinoma of the rectum. Geriatr Clin North Am 1985;1:485–92.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    McCready DR, Ota DM, Rich TA,et al. Prospective phase I trial of conservative management of low rectal lesions. Arch Surg 1989;124:67–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Waizer A, Zitron S. Ben-Baruch D, Baniel J, Wolloch Y, Dintsman M. Comparative study for preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:53–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yamashita Y, Machi J, Shirouzu K, Mortonis T, Isomoto H, Kakegawa T. Evaluation of endorectal ultrasound for the assessment of wall invasion of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:617–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zainea GC, Lee F, McLeary RD, Siders DB, Thieme ET. Transrectal ultrasonography in the evaluation of rectal and extrarectal disease. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1989;169:153–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. J. Saclarides
    • 1
  • A. K. Bhattacharyya
    • 2
  • C. Britton-Kuzel
    • 2
  • D. Szeluga
    • 1
  • S. G. Economou
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of General Surgery, Section of Colon and Rectal SurgeryRush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical CenterChicago
  2. 2.Departments of PathologyRush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical CenterChicago

Personalised recommendations