Investigation of a medieval sword using photon activation analysis

  • Chr Segebade
Article

Abstract

An ancient sword was examined for indications of forgery or, if authentic, any later processing or changes, e.g. replacement of parts of the weapon. Radiochemical as well as non-destructive analyses using high energy photon activation were used as analytical techniques. Metal parts of the hilt were analysed radiochemically and instrumentally whereas the blade was analysed non-destructively. Metallurgical investigations (hardness measurements, microstructure analysis) performed in parallel are also briefly described. No evidence of non-authenticity was found, which agrees well with the results of the stylistical and weapon-scientific investigation carried out by an expert of ancient weaponry.

Keywords

Microstructure Physical Chemistry Inorganic Chemistry Energy Photon Activation Analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    E. OAKESHOTT, The Sword in the Age of Chivalry, London, 1981.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. PRESTWICK, The Three Edwards, New York, 1980.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. OAKESHOTT, Records of the Medieval Sword, Boydell Press, Woodbridge, 1991.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Id., certificate, 1982, by courtesy of the owner, Mr. K. KLINGBEIL.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    BAM Reports Nos 6.3/3666, 1986, 6.3/1990, 1.1/7244, 1990.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    O. JOHANNSEN, in: Geschichte des Eisens, Stahleisen, Düsseldorf, 1953.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. SEGEBADE, H.-P. WEISE, G. J. LUTZ, Photon Activation Analysis, W. De GRUYTER, Berlin-New York, 1988.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    H.-P. WEISE, C. SEGEBADE, J. Radioanal. Chem., 49 (1979) 95.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. WESTERMEIER: GAMMAW, PC-Program for fully automatic high resolution gamma-ray spectrum processing, 1990.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. DEVEGIOGLU: SPEKI, An interactive peak processing PC-based program, 1990.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. L. BERMAN, Report UCRL-78482, 1976.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. SEGEBADE, M. KÜHL, B. F. SCHMITT, R. NEIDER, J. Radioanal. Chem., 72 (1982) 665.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. M. FRITZ, Arbeitsweisen gotischer Goldschmiede, Intern. Symp. on Historische Technologie der Edelmetalle, Ludwigsburg, FRG, June 2–4, 1980; published in summary form only.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. FLOURET, G. NICOLINI, C. METZGER, Gallia, 39 (1981) 85.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. DEMORTIER, Archaeologia, 176 (1983).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. DEMORTIER, Aurifex, 5 (1983).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    C. SEGEBADE, U. MENZEL, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., in print.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    G. BECKER, Arch. Eisenhüttenw., 32 (1961) 661.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. F. TYLECOTE, R. THOMSEN, Archaeometry, 15 (1973) 193.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. THOMSEN, Radex-Rundsch., 3 (1971) 479.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chr Segebade
    • 1
  1. 1.Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und-prüfung (BAM), BerlinBerlin 45(Germany)

Personalised recommendations