Minerals and the Environment

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 144–149 | Cite as

Habitat use by Red-tailed Hawks in surface-mined areas

  • David P. Mindell
  • David E. Samuel


Habitat use by 4 radio-tagged red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis) was monitored during 708 transmitter-days in coal surface-mined areas in northern West Virginia and southwestern Pennsylvania in 1977 and 1978. Mean cumulative home range size for the 3 adults was 316.8 ha (3.2 km2). Red-tailed hawks showed significant (P<0.005) tendencies to elect certain habitats over others. Descending order of habitat electivity was: 1) woods edge with open area not surfacemined. 2) woods edge with surface-mined area. 3) deciduous woods, 4) open area not surface-mined, and 5) surface-mined area. Red-tailed hawks' flexibility in niche requirements allowed them to exploit reclaimed area. Recommendations for surface mine reclamation are given.


Geochemistry Range Size Home Range Open Area Surface Mine 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,Balancing national energy need with ecological requirements. Eastern Energy Land Use Task Force Report — Executive Summary. 1977, 34pp.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown, L., and D. Amadon,Eagles, hawks, and, falcons, of the world. McGraw Hill Book Co., New York (Hamlyn Publ. Group, Ltd., Middlesex, England), 1968, 945 pp.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dunstan, T. C., Radio-tagged falconiform and strigiform birds.Raptor Res. 6, 1972, 93–102.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berger, D. D., and F. H. Hamerstrom, Protecting a trapping station from raptor predation.J. Wildl. Manage., 26, 1962, 203–206.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nicholls, T. H.,Ecology of barred owls as determined by an automatic radio-tracking system, Ph.D. Dissert., Univ. of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 1973, 162pp.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fuller, M. R., Spatiotemporal ecology of four sympatric raptor species, Ph.D. Dissert. Univ. of Minn., Minneapolis, 1979, 348pp.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ivlev, V. S.,Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT., 1961, 302pp.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krebbs, C. J., Microtus population biology: behavioral changes associated with the population cycle inM. ochrogaster andM. pennsylvanicus, Ecology 51, 1970, 34–52.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smith, R. L.,Biology and field ecology, Harper and Row, New York, 1974, 850pp.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Belyea, G. Y.,A nesting study of the red-tailed hawk in southern Michigan, Ph.D. Dissert. Mich. State Univ., East Lansing, 1976, 64pp.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Luttich, S. N., D. H. Rusch, E. C. Meslow, and L. B. Keith, Ecology of red-tailed hawk predation in Alberta.Ecology 51, 1970, 190–203.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gates, J. M., Red-tailed hawk populations and ecology in east-central Wisconsin,Wilson Bull 84, 1972, 421–433.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Titus, K. and J. A. Mosher, Nest-site habitat selected by woodland hawks in the central Appalachians.Auk 98, 1981, 270–281.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tevis, L., Jr., Effect of slash burn on forest mice.J. Wildl. Manage., 20, 1956, 405–409.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Michael, E. D.,Effects of highways on wildlife, West Virginia Department of Highways Project No. 42, 1975, 89pp.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    McInvaille, W. B., Jr., and L. B. Keith, Predator-prey relations and breeding biology of the great horned owl and red-tailed hawk in central Alberta.Can. Field Nat. 88, 1974, 1–20.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Greffenius, R. J., A method for determining the relative abundance ofMicrotus pennsylvanicus.J. Wildl. Manage., 3, 1939, 119–200.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eadie, W. R., Response ofMicrotus to vegetative cover.J. Mammal. 34, 1952, 263–264.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Geier, A. R., and L. B. Best. Habitat selection by small mammals of riparian communities: evaluating effects of habitat alterations.J. Wildl. Manage. 44, 1980, 16–24.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brenner, F. J., Food and cover evaluation of strip mine plants as related to wildlife management, pages 294–305in D. E. Samuel, J. R. Stauffer, C. H. Hocutt, and W. T. Mason, (eds.),Surface mining and West Virginia Univ., Morgantown, 1978, 386pp.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vickery, P. J., Grazing and net primary production of a temperate grassland.J. Appl. Ecol. 9, 1972, 307–314.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mindell, D. P.,Habitat use by red-tailed hawks in surfacemined areas. M.S. Thesis, West Virginia Univ., Morgantown, 1978, 98pp.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marquis, M., and I. Newton, Habitat preference in male and female Sparrowhawks(Accipiter nisus), Proc. Hawk Trust Conf. 1979.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Craighead, J. J., and F. C. Craighead,Hawks, owls and wildlife, Stackpole, Harrisburg, PA, 1956, 443pp.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Orians, G. H., and F. R. Kuhlman, Red-tailed hawk and horned owl populations in Wisconsin.Condor 58, 1956, 371–385.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hagar, D. C., Jr., Nesting populations of red-tailed hawks and horned owls in central New York.Wilson Bull. 69, 1957, 263–272.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Luttich, S. N., L. B. Keith, and J. D. Stephenson, Population dynamics of the red-tailed hawk at Rochester, Alberta.Auk 88, 1971, 75–88.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Olendorff, R. R., and M. N. Kochert. Land management for the conservation of birds of prey, Pages 294–307in R. D. Chancellor, (ed.), Report of proceedings, 1975. International Council for Bird Preservation, 1977, 442pp.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Forren, J. D.Artificial perch use by raptors on reclaimed surface mines in West Virginia, M.S. Thesis, West Virginia University. Morgantown, 1981, 196pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science and Technology Letters 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • David P. Mindell
    • 1
  • David E. Samuel
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of ForestryWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownU.S.A.
  2. 2.Wildlife Biology, Division of ForestryMorgantownWest Virginia UniversityU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations