Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of methods for the determination of the dating-nuclides210Pb and226Ra

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lead-210 is often used to date recent (≤100 y) environmental samples. Three different methods for its determination are compared:210Pb β-counting with a low level proportional counter,210Pb γ-spectroscopy and210Po α-spectroscopy. Agreement within analytical errors was found for the three methods in two sediment cores from Lake Zurich, Switzerland and in IAEA SD-A-1 deep sea reference material. For210Po α-spectroscopy, the detection and determination limit is an order of magnitude lower than these for the other methods. Methods for the determination of226Ra are also discussed. Measurements on low level proportional counters are difficult to interpret and not suitable for routine work. A better way to measure226Ra is σ-spectroscopy of colloidal Ba(Ra)SO4.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. KRISHNASWAMY, D. LAL, J. M. MARTIN, M. MEYBECK, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 11 (1971) 407.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. G. APPLEBY, F. OLDFIELD, Catena, 5 (1978) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. BENOIT, H. F. HEMOND, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 55 (1991) 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. R. VON GUNTEN, R. N. MOSER, J. Paleolimn., in press.

  5. H. GÄGGELER, H. R. VON GUNTEN, U. NYFFELER, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 33 (1976) 119.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. H. Mc CORKELL, C. W. SMITH, J. L. DALTON, Can. J. Spectroscopy, 30 (1985) 30.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. R. JOSHI, A. MUDROCH, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A263 (1988) 529.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Y. HINO, Y. KAWADA, Nucl. Instrum. Methods, A286 (1990) 543.

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. BÃCHMANN, A. OLKIS, H. KLENK, Health Phys., 46 (1984) 1131.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. J. M. DE OLIVEIRA GODOY, PhD thesis, Karlsruhe KfK 3502 (1983).

  11. C. W. SILL, Report DE83-014 959. EG&G Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho, U.S.A., 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  12. T-P LIM, N. K. DAVE, N. R. CLOUTIER, Intern. J. Appl. Radiation Isotopes, 40 (1989) 63.

    Google Scholar 

  13. T. KATAOKA, K. MICHIHIRO, T. YAMAMOTO, Radioisotopes, 34 (1985) 662.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. L. ZIKOVSKY, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 153 (1991) 165.

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. G. FIGGINS, The radiochemistry of polonium, U.S. Atomic Energy Commision, NAS-NS-3037, 1961, p. 29.

  16. L. A. CURRIE, Anal. Chem., 40 (1968) 586.

    Google Scholar 

  17. International Atomic Energy Agency, Reference Material, IAEA-Marine Sediment SD-A-1, 1987.

  18. R. N. MOSER, H. R. VON GUNTEN, M. STURM, Proc. Heavy Metals in the Environ., Edinburgh, 1991, p. 351.

  19. W. S. MOORE, Nucl. Instrum. Methods, 223 (1984) 407.

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. A. SHORT, Nucl. Instrum. Methods, B17 (1986) 540.

    Google Scholar 

  21. N. E. WHITHEAD, R. G. DITCHBURN, W. J. Mc CABE, R. VAN DER RAAIJ, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 160 (1992) 477.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moser, R.N. A comparison of methods for the determination of the dating-nuclides210Pb and226Ra. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, Articles 173, 283–292 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02043030

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02043030

Keywords

Navigation