Abstract
Recent ethnographic research carried out in Spain has allowed the cultivation ofLathyrus sativus L. andL. cicera L. to be documented. Both species already appear in the Spanish archaeological record. Grown under traditional farming systems,L. sativus L. andL. cicera L. are still used for human consumption (onlyL. sativus L.) and both are used for fodder. Data on cultivation history, fanning practices, crop processing sequence and uses are here presented, which will enable a better understanding of their possible roles in prehistoric times.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Banqueri JA (1802) Abu El Awwam, Abu Zacaria lahia Aben Mohamed Ben Ahmed Ebn (1988) Abu Zakariya 'Yahyà B Muhammad B Al-'Awwam Libro de Agricultura (Spanish translation). Facsimile edition (1988) Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación, Madrid
Boyd Ash H (1941) Columella. De Re Rustica (Translation). Loeb Classical Library, London
Buxó i Capdevila R (1997) Arqueologia de las plantas. Critica, Barcelona
Carabaza, JM (1991) Abu L-Jayr. Kitab Al-Filaha: Tratado de Agricultura. Instituto de cooperación con et mundo árabe, Madrid
Dantín Cereceda J (1934) La alimentación española. Sus diferentes tipos. Madrid
Eguaras Ibáñez J (1988) Ibn Luyün: Tratado de Agricultura. Patronato de la Alhambra y Generalife, Granada
Franco Jubete F (1991) Los titarros. El cultivo de Lathyras en Castilla y León. Junta de Castilla y Lehn, Valladolid
Garcia Sánchez E (1992) Abu Marwan 'Abd Al-Malik B. Zuhr. Kitab A1-Agdiya: Tratado de los alimentos. CSIC/Instituto de Cooperación con et mundo Arabe, Madrid
Halstead P, Jones GEM (1989) Agrarian ecology in the Greek Islands: time stress, scale and risk. J Hellenic Stud 109: 41–55
Herrera A de (1513) Agricultura General (Eloy Terrón (ed) 1981) Ministerio de Agricultura Pesca y Alimentación, Madrid
Hillman GC (1981) Reconstructing crop husbandry practices from charred remains of crops. In: Mercer R (ed) Farming practice in prehistoric Britain. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp 123–162
Hillman GC: (1984a) Interpretation of archaeological plant remains: the application of ethnographic models from Turkey. In: Zeist W van, Casparie WA (ed.) Plants and ancient man: studies in palaeoethnobotany, Rotterdam, Balkema, pp 1–41
Hillman GC (1984b) Traditional husbandry and processing of archaic cereals in recent times: the operations, products and equipment which might feature in Sumerian texts. Part I: the glume wheats. Bull Sumerian Agriculture 1: 114–152
Hillman GC (1985) Traditional husbandry and processing of archaic cereals in recent times: the operations, products and equipment which might feature in Sumerian texts. Part II: the free-threshing wheats. Bull Sumerian Agriculture 2: 1–31
Jones GEM (1984) Interpretation of archaeological plant remains. Ethnographic methods from Greece. In: Zeist W van, Casparie W (eds) Plants and ancient man: studies in palaeoethnobotany. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 43–61
Jones GEM, Halstead P (1995) Maslins, mixtures and monocrops: on the interpretation of archaeobotanical crop samples of heterogeneous composition. J Arch Sci 22: 103–114
Ministerio de Agricultura Pesca y Alimentación (1904-1990) Anuario de estadistica agraria. Secretaría General Técnica del M.A.P.A., Madrid
Ministerio de Fomento (1891) Avance estadístico sobre el cultivo cereal y de leguminosas asociados en España (Quinquenio 1886–1890), Madrid
Peña-Chocarro L (1996) In-situ conservation of hulled-wheat species: the case of Spain. In: Padulosi S, Hammer K, Heller J (eds) Hulled wheats. Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and neglected crops. IPGRI, Rome, pp 129–146
Puerta G de la (1876) Tratado práctico de determinación de las plantas indigenas y cultivadas en España, de use medicinal, alimenticio e industrial, Madrid
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peña-Chocarro, L., Zapata Peña, L. History and traditional cultivation ofLathyrus sativus L. andLathyrus citera L. in the Iberian peninsula. Veget Hist Archaebot 8, 49–52 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02042842
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02042842