Annals of Vascular Surgery

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 39–41 | Cite as

Late results of preferential use of tube versus bifurcation grafts for abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy

  • Steven G. Friedman
  • Michelle Y. Hardaway
  • Antoni J. Jurkiewicz
  • K. V. Krishnasastry
  • William Doscher
  • Stephen L. Deckoff
  • Donald Fagelman
Original Articles
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

The advantages of tube versus bifurcation graft replacement of abdominal aortic aneurysms are well known, yet the risk of future development of iliac occlusive or aneurysmal disease still leads many to use bifurcation grafts routinely. Several studies have reported little risk of this development when patients are followed clinically. They suffer, however, from lack of an objective means of identifying iliac aneurysms. Among 83 patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy during a 53 month period, 36 who had received a tube graft were available for follow-up. After a mean of 54 months from the time of surgery, these patients were evaluated by abdominal and pelvic computed tomography to determine the incidence of subsequent iliac aneurysm formation. No patient had developed symptoms or signs of iliac occlusive disease during this interval. In addition, no residual aortic aneurysms or new iliac aneurysms were noted. In the absence of iliac occlusive or aneurysmal disease, straight graft replacement is the preferred therapy for abdominal aortic aneurysms. The risk of future development of these lesions is minimal.

Key words

Abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy Aneurysm Grafts Tube graft see Graft Bifurcation graft see Graft 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    ERNST CB, RUTKOW IM, CLEVELAND RJ. Vascular surgery in the United States.J Vasc Surg 1987;6:611–621.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    ORR WM, DAVIES M. Simplified repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms using non-bifurcated (straight) inlay prostheses.Br J Surg 1974;61:847–849.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    SNELLEN JP, TERPSTRA OT, VAN URK H. The use of a straight tube graft decreases blood loss and operation time in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm.Neth J Surg 1984;36-2:45–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    GLICKMAN MH, JULIAN CC, KIMMINS S. Aortic aneurysm: to tube or not to tube.Surgery 1982;91:603–605.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    EVANS WE, HAYES JP. Tube graft replacement of abdominal aortic aneurysms.Am J Surg 1988;156:119–121.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    JEZIC DV, STONESIFER GL. Computed tomography for non-invasive imaging of the iliac arteries.South Med J 1982;75:1385–1388.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    PROVAN JL, FLALKOV JA, AMELI FM. Is “tube” prosthetic repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm followed by post-operative dilatation of the common iliac arteries?J. Vasc Surg (in press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Annals of Vascular Surgery Inc. 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven G. Friedman
    • 1
  • Michelle Y. Hardaway
    • 1
  • Antoni J. Jurkiewicz
    • 1
  • K. V. Krishnasastry
    • 1
  • William Doscher
    • 1
  • Stephen L. Deckoff
    • 1
  • Donald Fagelman
    • 1
  1. 1.Great Neck

Personalised recommendations