Abstract
Several states have designed and implemented innovative programs for Medicaid beneficiaries that carve-out the provision of mental health from general health care. This paper describes several such programs and outlines the choices states face in designing these services. Major decisions include the selection of a public or private agency, how that agency is chosen, reimbursement schemes, eligibility criteria, and benefits to be covered. While carve-out programs have yielded initial savings, more research is needed on their effect on quality of care and general health care costs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Callahan, J., Shepard, S., Beinecke, R., Larson, M.J., & Cavanaugh, D. (1994).Evaluation of the Massachusetts Medicaid Substance Abuse Program. Unpublished manuscript. Heller School, Brandeis University.
Dorwart, R., & Epstein, S. (1993).Privatization and mental health care: A fragile balance. New York, NY: Auburn House.
Frank, R., McGuire, T., & Newhouse, J. (1995). Risk contracts in managed mental health care.Health Affairs, 14(3), 50–64.
Hodgkin, D. (1992). The impact of private utilization management on psychiatric care: A review of the literature.Journal of Mental Health Administration, 19, 143–157.
Levit, K.R., Lazenby, H.C., Cowan, C.A., Won, D.K. (1995). State health expenditure accounts: Building blocks for state health spending analysis.Health Care Financing Review, 17, 201–254.
Newhouse, J. (1993).Free for all Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Obradovich, K. (1995, December 20). State's mental health care agency says it's acting on complaints.Quad City Times, Section A, p. 8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Busch, S. Carving-out mental health benefits to Medicaid beneficiaries: A shift toward managed care. Adm Policy Ment Health 24, 301–321 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02042516
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02042516