References
Bootzin, R. R., Sechrest, L., Scott, A., & Hannah, M. (1992). Common methodological problems in health services research proposals.EGAD Quarterly, 1, 101–107.
Fogg, L., & Fiske, D. W. (1993). Foretelling the judgements of reviewers and editors.American Psychologist, 48, 293–4.
General Accounting Office. (1994).Peer review: Reforms needed to ensure fairness in federal agency grant selection (GAO/PEMD-94-1). Washington, DC: Author.
Gordon, M. (1996). Writing a grant proposal. In E. B. Carlson,Trauma research and methodology, (pp. 244–287). Lutherville, MD: The Sirdan Press.
Macias, C., Farley, O. W., Fraser, M., Vos, B., & Jackson, R. (1992). Assessment of the Strengths Case Management Program in Utah: Adapting the model to fit rural needs.Outlook, 2(3), 9–11.
Pequegnat, W., & Stover, E. (Eds.). (1995).How to write a successful grant application. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Steinberg, J., & Kennedy, C. (1995). Successful research grant applications. In H. A. Pincus (Ed.),Psychiatric research resource manual, (pp. 21–28). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
U. S. Senate. (1990).Senate Report 101-516 (101st Congress, 2nd Session. To accompany H.R. 5257. Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education and related agencies Appropriations Bill, 1991). Washington DC: Author.
Windle, C. (1992). NIMH support of rural mental health research, 1992. Outlook2(3), 6–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Director of the Office of Rural Mental Health Research from its inception until his retirement in 1994.
The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of NNIMH.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pollitt, F.A., Notgrass, C.M. & Windle, C. Mental health services research. Adm Policy Ment Health 24, 173–180 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02042489
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02042489