Skip to main content
Log in

Validation of methods for the determination of aluminium in fish gills by INAA and ICP-MS

  • Radioanalytical Methods: Data Quality, Method Validation and Use of Standard Reference Materials
  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a European study of fish death in mixing zones of rivers with different acidities a reliable determination of Al and other elements in gills from freshwater fish was required, and both INAA and ICP-MS were studied as candidate reference methods. INAA requires minimum sample handling with a correspondingly small risk of contamination and no blank value; however, a careful study was needed of both nuclear interference from P and the increased detection limit caused by other major elements in the sample, before reliable results for Al could be ascertained. ICP-MS requires dissolution of the sample with a resulting risk of contamination and a significant reagent blank; while sensitivity was good, the interference from N created problems for sample decomposition in the microwave oven. Our experience with actual samples indicates that both methods suffer from considerable contamination problems, requiring that samples be handled in a clean bench with superpure reagents. Nuclear interference was determined experimentally by irradiating stoichiometric P-compounds with and without a Cd-shield; the observed interference of 1 μg Al from 50 mg of P was found to require no correction in almost all cases. The accuracy of results was ascertained by analyzing SRM 1577 Bovine Liver.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B.O. ROSSELAND, T.E. BRANDRUD, G.G. RADDUM, Acid Rain Research, Report 31 (1992) Norwegian Institute for Water Research, NIVA.

  2. J.M. HENSHAW, E.M. HEITHMAR, T.A. HINNERS, Anal. Chem.,61 (1989) 335.

    Google Scholar 

  3. ISOGuide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. ISO/TAG 4 (1993), International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. HEYDORN, Microchim. Acta [Wien] III (1991) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. HEYDORN,Neutron Activation Analysis for Clinical Trace Element Research, Vol. 1, CRC-Press, Boca Raton, Fl. (1984) 128.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. DAMSGAARD, K. HEYDORN, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem.,113 (1987) 267.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E.S. GLADNEY, B.T. O'MALLEY, I. ROELANDTS, T.E. GILLS,Compilation of Element Concentration Data for Standard Reference Materials, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. GRIEPINK, E.A. MAIER, H. MUNTAU, Report EUR 12680, Community Bureau of Reference, Luxembourg, (1990).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heydorn, K., Alfassi, Z., Damsgaard, E. et al. Validation of methods for the determination of aluminium in fish gills by INAA and ICP-MS. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, Articles 192, 321–329 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02041736

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02041736

Keywords

Navigation