Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 375–404 | Cite as

Numerical experiments with a one-dimensional higher order turbulence model: Simulation of the Wangara Day 33 case

  • Chaing Chen
  • William R. Cotton
Article

Abstract

A one-dimensional stratocumulus model is developed and incorporated into a cloud/mesoscale model to simulate the evolution of the marine stratocumulus-capped mixed layer.

This paper describes the formulation of the higher-order turbulence model. In a companion paper (Chen and Cotton, 1983), the formulation of the atmospheric radiation model, the partial condensation and the cloud fractional parameterization are described.

The second-order moments of this model are partially diagnosed. In order to close the system, the parameterization for the third-order moments given by Zeman and Lumley (1976) is adopted and is generalized to include total water and cloud water. A new scheme to parameterize the skewness terms is proposed in order to satisfy the enforced realizability. Those skewness terms are used to close the third-order moments.

In this paper, experiments are carried out to test the turbulence model by using the Wangara Day 33 data, which represents a ‘dry’ case study. Sensitivity experiments using the turbulence length scale parameterizations formulated by Andréet al. (1978) and Sun and Ogura (1980) are reformed and are compared.

Keywords

Mixed Layer Scale Parameterization Turbulence Model Total Water Companion Paper 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. André, J. C., DeMoor, G., Lacarrere, P., and DuVachat, R.: 1976, ‘Turbulence Approximation for Inhomogeneous Flows’,J. Atmos. Sci. 33, 476–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. André, J. C., DeMoor, G., Lacarrere, P., Therry, G., and DuVachat, R.: 1978, ‘Modeling the 24-hour Evolution of the Mean and Turbulent Structures of the Planetary Boundary Layer’,J. Atmos. Sci. 35, 1861–1883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banda, R. and Cotton, W. R.: 1979, A Diagnostic Parameterization for Subgrid Covariances in a Boundary-Layer Model, Fourth Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction, Oct. 29–Nov. 1, 1979, pp. 360–363, Boston, AMS.Google Scholar
  4. Blackadar, A. K.: 1962, ‘The Vertical Distribution of Wind and Turbulent Exchange in Neutral Atmosphere’,J. Geophys. Res. 67, 3095–3102.Google Scholar
  5. Brost, R. A., Wyngaard, J. C., and Lenschow, D. H.: 1982, ‘Marine Stratocumulus Layers. Part II: Turbulence Budgets’,J. Atmos. Sci. 39, 818–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, C. and Cotton, W. R.: 1983, ‘A One-dimensional Simulation of the Stratocumulus-capped Mixed Layer’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 25, 289–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cotton, W. R., and Tripoli, G. J.: 1978, ‘Cumulus Convection in Shear Flow Three-dimensional Numerical Experiments’,J. Atmos. Sci. 35, 1503–1521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deardorff, J. W.: 1974, ‘Three Dimensional Numerical Study of the Height and Mean Structure of a Heated Planetary Boundary Layer’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 7, 81–106.Google Scholar
  9. Deardorff, J. W.: 1980, ‘Stratocumulus-capped Mixed Layer Derived from a Three-dimensional Model’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 18, 495–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kaimal, J. C., Wyngaard, J. C., Haugen, D. A., Coté, O. R., Tzumi, Y., Caughey, S. J., and Reading, C. J.: 1976, ‘Turbulence Structure in the Convective Boundary Layer’,J. Atmos. Sci. 33, 2152–2169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lenschow, D. H., Wyngaard, J. C., and Pennell, W. T.: 1980, ‘Mean Field and Second Moment Budget in a Baroclinic Convective Boundary Layer’,J. Atmos. Sci. 37, 1313–1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Manton, M. J. and Cotton, W. R.: 1977, ‘Formulation of Approximate Equations for Modeling Moist Deep Convection on the Mesoscale’, Atmospheric Science Paper No. 266, Colorado State University, 62 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Moeng, C. H.: 1979, Stability of a Turbulent Layer Cloud Within the Planetary Boundary Layer, Ph.D. Thesis, The University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  14. Oliver, D. A., Lewellen, W. S., and Williamson, G. G.: 1978, ‘The Interaction Between Turbulent and Radiative Transport in the Development of Fog and Low-Level Stratus’,J. Atmos. Sci. 35, 301–316.Google Scholar
  15. Sun, W.-Y. and Ogura, Y.: 1980, ‘Modeling the Evolution of Convective Planetary Boundary Layer’,J. Atmos. Sci. 37, 1558–1572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Telford, J. W. and Warner, J.: 1964, ‘Fluxes of Heat and Vapor in the Lower Atmosphere Derived from Aircraft Observations’,J. Atmos. Sci. 21, 539–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tripoli, G. J. and Cotton, W. R.: 1981, ‘The Use of Ice-liquid Water Potential Temperature as a Thermodynamic Variable in Deep Atmospheric Models’,Mon. Wea. Rev. 109, 164–172.Google Scholar
  18. Tripoli, G. J. and Cotton, W. R.: 1983, ‘The Colorado State University Three-dimensional Cloud/Mesoscale Model — 1982’, to be published inJ. de Rech. Atmos. Google Scholar
  19. Willis, G. E. and Deardorff, J. W.: 1974, ‘A Laboratory Model of the Unstable Planetary Boundary Layer’,J. Atmos. Sci. 31, 1297–1307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wyngaard, J. C. and Coté, O. R.: 1974, ‘The Evolution of a Convective Planetary Boundary Layer — A Higher-order Closure Model Study’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 7, 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zeman, O. and Lumley, J.: 1976, ‘Modeling Buoyancy Driven Mixed Layers’,J. Atmos. Sci. 33, 1974–1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Co. 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chaing Chen
    • 1
  • William R. Cotton
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Atmospheric ScienceColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations