Advertisement

The removal of thorium from aqueous solutions using zeolites

  • A. Dyer
  • L. C. Jozefowicz
Article

Abstract

The ability of zeolites to remove thorium-232 from naturally radioactive thorium nitrate solutions was studied by ion exchange, adsorption and surface phenomena. The best zeolites were a clinoptilolite from Mudhills, California, USA and a mordenite rich tuff from Eastgate, Nevada, USA. As the concentration of thorium in solution was increased the mechanism of thorium removal switches from that of partial ion-exchange to a surface precipitation. This was confirmed by electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) in conjunction with XRD and Energy Dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX). A Langmuir-type of adsorption occurred with the thorium-232 daughter isotopes at the same time as partial exchange/precipitation of the thorium parent which is in regular equilibrium with its natural daughters. Some experiments with234Th were carried out to confirm this hypothesis as well as column experiments to confirm the usefulness of the Th removal.

Keywords

Zeolite Thorium Nitrate Solution Electron Probe Microanalysis Clinoptilolite 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    C. G. HITZ, K. J. HOFSTETTER, in: The Mile Island Accident, L. M. TOTH, A. P. MALINANKAS, G. R. EIDAM, H. M. BURTON (Eds), ACS Symp. Ser., 293 (1986) p. 250.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. HOWDEN, J. PILOT, in: Ion-Exchange Technology, D. NADEN, M. STREAT, (Eds), Ellis Horwood, UK, 1984, p. 698.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. ECCLES, in: Ion-Exchange Technology, D. NADEN, M. STREAT, (Eds), Ellis Horwood, UK, 1984, p. 698.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    I. YOSHINOG, Kakuriken Kenkyu Hokoku (Tohoko Diagaku), 21 (1988) 71.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. W. PERKINS, D. R. KALKWARF, Anal. Chem., 28 (1956) 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. DYER, H. ENAMY, R. P. TOWNSEND, Sep. Sci. Technol., 16 (1981) 173.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. DYER, Liquid Scintillation Counting Practice Heyden, London, 1980.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. H. FLETCHER, R. G. MILKEY, Anal. Chem., 28 (1956) 1402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Inorganic Phases (JPCDS) Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards, No. 35-103, 1984.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. GOTTARDI, E. GALLI, Natural Zeolites, Springer-Verlag, 1985, p. 208.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Phelps Dodge Zeolite Company, Mudhills Clinoptilolite Data Sheet.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. T. SEABORG, J. J. KATZ, The Actinide Elements, ist ed., McGraw Hill, 1954, p. 787.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. FREUDE, M. HUNGER, H. PFEIFER, W. SCHWEIGER, Chem. Phys. Letts., 128 (1986) 62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. P. BOLTON, in: Experimental Methods in Catalytic Research, Vol. 2, Eds: R. B. ANDERSON, P. T. DAWSON, (Eds), Academic Press, New York, 1976, p. 18.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    C. A. SIKALIDIS, C. ALEXIADES, P. MISAELIDES, Toxicol. Environ, Chem., 20–21, (1989) 175.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Dyer
    • 1
  • L. C. Jozefowicz
    • 1
  1. 1.Cockcroft Building, Department of Chemistry and Applied ChemistryUniversity of SalfordSalford(UK)

Personalised recommendations