Redox determination of uranium in presence of plutonium in low phosphoric acid medium and the recovery of plutonium

Some new observations
  • G. R. Relan
  • A. R. Joshi
  • R. H. Iyer


Quantitative determination of uranium in (U, Pu)O2 fuels is usually done by the DAVIES-GRAY method. High concentrations of phosphoric acid in the analytical waste generated by this method make the revocery of plutonium rather complex. Studies on the recovery of plutonium from nitric acid medium containing different concentrations of H3PO4 by conventional anion-exchange procedure reveal that more than 90% of the plutonium can be easily recovered when the phosphoric acid concentration is less than 0.5 M in the solution. A method was developed for the determination of uranium in the presence of plutonium, which involves the reduction of U(VI) to U(IV) by Fe(II) in a medium of 3.5M H3PO4 +4.5M H2SO4 instead of 10–11M H3PO4 so as to have the H3PO4 concentration ∼0.6M in the waste. A number of determinations of uranium in UO2(NO3)2 working standard solutions and (U, Pu) synthetic solutions with uranium at the 3–7 mg level were carried out by this method. The precision obtained was better than ±0.2% and the accuracy was also within the precision limits. The resulting analytical waste generated was directly subjected to anion exchange separation for the recovery of plutonium which was found to be more than 90%.


Uranium Nitric Acid Phosphoric Acid Acid Medium Anion Exchange 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    W. DAVIES, W. GRAY, Talanta, 11 (1964) 1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. R. EBERLE, M. W. LERNER, C. G. GOLDBECK, C. J. RODDEN, Report NBL-252, 1970.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. CHERRY, UKAEA Report PG, Rept. 827 (W) 1968.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. MARESKA, Talanta, 19 (1972) 212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. JOHN, S. VAIDYANATHAN, P. VENKATARAMANA, P. R. NATARAJAN, ANAL-58, Annual Convention of Chemists, Analytical Section, Bangalore, 1976.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    1975 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Part 45, p. 176–178, Method C696-74.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. B. STEPHENS, R. G. GUTMACHER, K. ERNST, J. E. HARAR, Report NUREG-0256, 1977, Report NUREG-75/010, 1975.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. T. CHITNIS, R. T. KULKARNI, S. G. REGE, A. MUKHERJEE, J. Radioanal. Chem., 45, (1978) 331.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. GOPAL RAO, SEETA RAMA RAJU SAGI, Talanta, 9 (1962) 715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. R. Relan
    • 1
  • A. R. Joshi
    • 2
  • R. H. Iyer
    • 1
  1. 1.Nuclear Materials Accounting CellBhabha Atomic Research CentreBombay(India)
  2. 2.Radiochemistry DivisionBhabha Atomic Research CentreBombay(India)

Personalised recommendations