Skip to main content
Log in

Foliage constituents of douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco (Pinaceae)): Their seasonal variation and potential role in douglas fir resistance and silviculture management

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seasonal changes in the production of primary nutrients (soluble carbohydrates) and secondary metabolites (terpenes, monomeric phenolics, and tannins) in the current needle tissue of Douglas fir were investigated. All four classes of compounds showed significant seasonal changes in concentration during foliage development. Most terpenes increased significantly in concentration from June 11 to August 3, and then showed declining concentrations to September 20. The most dramatic and significant seasonal increases occurred inα-pinene, camphene, and bornyl acetate concentrations. The monomeric phenolics chlorogenic acid, taxifolin glucoside, quercetin galactoside, and those unknown phenolics showed an overall trend of declining in concentration from June 11 through September 20. However, considerable variation between sampling dates in the concentration of these phenolics was noted. Tannin concentration decreased significantly from June 11 to July 9, and then increased in concentration to the September 20 sampling date. Fructose, galactose, glucose, and sucrose tended to decrease from June 11 to September 20. However, significant variation between sampling dates was evident in these compounds as well. Galactose was the major compound in the soluble carbohydrate fraction, amounting to almost 80% of the total concentration throughout the growing season. These data suggest that if phenolics and tannins function as defenses, they would only affect second- and possibly third-instar budworm larvae during the time that these instars mine the buds. Camphene,α-pinene, and bornyl acetate increased in concentration throughout the growing season and may be effective deterrents to the budworm. Both bornyl acetate and camphene have been shown in field and laboratory studies to increase larval mortality and adversely affect budworm larval growth. Carbohydrates generally act as nutrients that enhance herbivore growth. However, in a previous study, galactose was found to cause reduced budworm larval growth and increased larval mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carlson, C., Fellin, D., andSchmidt, W. 1983. The western spruce budworm in northern Rocky Mountain forests: A review of ecology, insecticidal treatments, and silvicultural practices,in The State of Knowledge and Research Needs. J. O'Loughlin and R. Pfister (eds.). Management of Second-growth Forests. Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, Missoula, Montana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cates, R.G., andRedak, R. 1988. Variation in the terpene chemistry of Douglas-fir and its relationship to western spruce budworm success, pp. 317–344,in K. C. Spencer (ed.). Chemical Mediation of Coevolution. Pergamon Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cates, R.G., andZou, J. 1990. Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) in terpene chemistry and its role in budworm (Choristoneura occidentalis Freeman) Dynamics, pp. 169–182,in A. Watt, S. Leatyer, M. Hunter, and N. Kidd (eds.). Population Dynamics of Forest Insects. Intercept, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cates, R.G., Redak, R., andHenderson, C. 1983. Patterns in defensive natural product chemistry: Douglas-fir and western spruce budworm interaction. American Chemical Society Symposium Series 208. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C. pp. 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clancy, K.M., Wagner, M.R., andTinus, R.W. 1988. Variation in host foliage nutrient concentrations in relation to western spruce budworm herbivory.Can. J. Fors. Res. 18:530–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denno, R.F., andMcClure, M.S. (ed). 1983. Variable Plants and Herbivores in Natural and Managed Systems. Academic Press, New York. 717 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambliel, H., andCates, R.G. 1995. Terpene changes due to maturation and canopy level in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) current year's growth.Biochem. Syst. Ecol. In press.

  • Lindroth, R.L., Scriber, J.L., andStephen, H. 1988, Chemical ecology of the tiger swallowtail: Mediation of host use by phenolic glycosides.Ecology 69(3):814–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M.M., andMartin J.S. 1984. Surfactants: Their role in preventing the precipitation of proteins by tannins in insect guts.Oecologia 61:342–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, G.A., andJanzen, D.H. 1979. Herbivores: Their Interaction with Secondary Plant Metabolites. Academic Press, New York. 718 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute. 1985. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. SAS Institute, Inc. Cary, North Carolina.

  • Wagner, M.R., Clancy, K.M., andTinus, R.W. 1989. Maturational variation in needle essential oils fromPseudotsuga menziesii, Abies concolor andPicea engelmannii.Phytochemistry 28:765–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, W., andCates, R.G. 1987. Site and Stand Characteristics, pp. 89–115,in M. Brookes, R. Campbell, J. Colbert, R. Mitchell, and R. Stark (eds.). Western Spruce Budworm, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou, J., andCates, R.G. 1994. Role of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) carbohydrates in resistance to budworm (Choristoneura occidentalis).J. Chem. Ecol. 20:395–405.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zou, J., Cates, R.G. Foliage constituents of douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco (Pinaceae)): Their seasonal variation and potential role in douglas fir resistance and silviculture management. J Chem Ecol 21, 387–402 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02036736

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02036736

Key Words

Navigation