Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative study of calibration methods for quantification of alpha-emitting radionuclides (plutonium) by semiconductor detectors

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The activity of α-emitting radionuclides is usually measured by semiconductor detectors (surface barrier or ion implanted). Overlapping and composite bands are quite common problems depending on energy differences of the radionuclides and counting source preparation. The classical approach to activity quantification is based on peak integration and, when it is used, overlapping may be overcome by a detailed study of each case, whereas composite bands can not be completely resolved. Here, spectra of the α-emitting plutonium isotopes, obtained by ion implanted semiconductor detectors, have been used to compare the classical approach with a multivariate calibration method (MVC-PLS). The study is performed at environmental activity levels (0–52 dpm). The relative errors obtained for239+240Pu activity determination, using either the classical or the MVC-PLS approach with replicates, are good enough to quantify isotopes at low level activities. The distribution of relative errors is asymmetric, with a positive component for 0–10.5 dpm subset, in the classical approach whereas it is more symmetric in the MVC-PLS method. The results show that the classical approach depends on peak overlap, whereas the MVC does not. As a whole, MVC is a more robust method than the classical approach. Composite bands were studied using the239Pu–240Pu mixture; the MVC approach did not allow individual quantification due to the lack of signal reproducibility. This instability does not affect the regular integration procedures but it is important in the deconvolution processes. The lack of reproducibility is related to the source preparation process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. F. Knoll, Radiation detection and measurement, John Wiley and Sons, 1979.

  2. I. K. Kressin, Anal. Chem., 49 (1977) 842.

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. Trautmann, H. Folger, Nucl. Instrum. Methods, A282 (1989) 102.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. M. Ide, W. D. Moss, M. A. Gautier, Health Phys., 56 (1989) 71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Siegbahn, Alpha-, Beta- and Gamma-ray spectroscopy, North Holland Publishing Co., 1965.

  6. G. H. Coleman, Plutonium Radiochemistry, National Technical Information Service, National Academy of Sciences — National Research Council, 3058, 1965.

  7. M. Toribio, J. F. Garcia, A. Izquierdo-Ridorsa, R. Tauler, G. Rauret, Anal. Chim. Acta, 310 (1995) 297.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Holm, A. Aakrog, S. Ballestra, J. J. Lopes, in: 4th Symp. International de Radioecologie de Cadarache, 1988, pA-22(A-36).

  9. E. Holm, R. Fukai, N. E. Whitehead, in: Intem. Conf. on Environmental Radioactivity in the Mediterranean Area, 1988, Sociedad Nuclear Española, p. 601.

  10. W. Raab, J. L. Parus, Nucl. Instrum. Methods, A339 (1994) 116.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. L. Massart, B. G. M. Vandeginste, S. N. Deming, Y. Michotte, L. Kaufman, Chemometrics: A Textbook, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. W. Wise, PLS-Toolbox for use with MatlabTM, Versión 1, 3, 1992.

  13. N. A. Talvitie, Anal. Chem., 44 (1972) 280.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Toribio, M., García, J.F., Izquierdo-Ridorsa, A. et al. Comparative study of calibration methods for quantification of alpha-emitting radionuclides (plutonium) by semiconductor detectors. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 221, 73–78 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02035245

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02035245

Keywords

Navigation