Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 21, Issue 5, pp 601–626 | Cite as

Effects of biotic and abiotic stress on induced accumulation of terpenes and phenolics in red pines inoculated with bark beetle-vectored fungus

  • Kier D. Klepzig
  • Eric L. Kruger
  • Eugene B. Smalley
  • Kenneth F. Raffa


This study characterized the chemical response of healthy red pine to artificial inoculation with the bark beetle-vectored fungusLeptographium terebrantis. In addition, we sought to determine whether stress altered this induced response and to understand the implications of these interactions to the study of decline diseases. Twenty-five-year-old trees responded to mechanical wounding or inoculation withL. terebrantis by producing resinous reaction lesions in the phloem. Aseptically wounded and wound-inoculated phloem contained higher concentrations of phenolics than did constitutive tissue. Trees inoculated withL. terebrantis also contained higher concentrations of six monoterpenes,α-pinene,β-pinene, 3-carene, limonene, camphene, and myrcene, and higher total monoterpenes than did trees that were mechanically wounded or left unwounded. Concentrations of these monoterpenes increased with time after inoculation. Total phenolic concentrations in unwounded stem tissue did not differ between healthy and root-diseased trees. Likewise, constitutive monoterpene concentrations in stem phloem were similar between healthy and root-diseased trees. However, when stem phloem tissue was challenged with fungal inoculations, reaction tissue from root-diseased trees contained lower concentrations ofα-pinene, the predominant monoterpene in red pine, than did reaction tissue from healthy trees. Seedlings stressed by exposure to low light levels exhibited less extensive induced chemical changes when challenge inoculated withL. terebrantis than did seedlings growing under higher light. Stem phloem tissue in these seedlings contained lower concentrations ofα-pinene than did nonstressed seedlings also challenge inoculated withL. terebrantis. It is hypothesized that monoterpenes and phenolics play a role in the defensive response of red pine against insect-fungal attack, that stress may predispose red pine to attack by insect-fungal complexes, and that such interactions are involved in red pine decline disease. Implications to plant defense theory and interactions among multiple stress agents in forest decline are discussed.

Key Words

Monoterpene phenolics α-pinene β-pinene red pine bark beetles Leptographium Ips Hylastes defense stress decline growth-differentiation balance 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abacus Concepts. 1989. SuperANOVA. Abacus Concepts, Inc., Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
  2. Bordasch, R.P., andBerryman, A.A. 1977. Host resistance to the fir engraver beetle,Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) 2. Repellancy ofAbies grandis resins and some monoterpenes.Can. Entomol. 109:95–100.Google Scholar
  3. Bridges, J.R. 1987. Effects of terpenoid compounds on growth of symbiotic fungi associated with the southern pine beetle.Phytopathology 77:83–85.Google Scholar
  4. Cates, R.G., andAlexander, H. 1982. Host resistance and susceptibility, pp. 212–263,in J.B. Mitton and K.B. Sturgeon (eds.). Bark Beetles in North American Conifers. A.P.S. Press, St. Paul, Minnesota.Google Scholar
  5. Christensen, E., andEricsson, A. 1986. Starch reserves inPicea abies in relation to defense reaction against a bark beetle transmitted blue-stain fungus,Ceratocystis polonica.Can. J. For. Res. 16:78–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cobb, F.W., Jr., Krstic, M., Zavarin, E., andBarber, H.W., Jr. 1968. Inhibitory effects of volatile oleoresin components onFomes annosus and fourCeratocystis species.Phytopathology 58:1327–1335.Google Scholar
  7. Cook, S.P., andHain, F.P. 1986. Defensive mechanisms of loblolly and shortleaf pine against attack by sourthern pine beetle,Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmerman (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and its fungal associate,Ceratocystis minor (Hedgecock) Hunt.J. Chem. Ecol. 12:1397–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coyne, J.F., andLott, L.H. 1976. Toxicity of substances in pine oleoresin to southern pine beetles.J. Ga. Entomol. Soc. 11:301–305.Google Scholar
  9. DeGroot, R.C. 1972. Growth of wood-inhabiting fungi in saturated atmospheres of monoterpenoids.Mycologia 64:863–870.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Delorme, L., andLieutier, F. 1990. Monoterpene composition of the preformed and induced resins of Scots pine, and their effect on bark beetles and associated fungi.Eur. J. For. Pathol. 20:304–316.Google Scholar
  11. Entry, J.A., Cromack, K., Jr., Hansen, E., andWaring, R. 1991. Response of western coniferous seedlings to infection byArmillaria ostoyae under limited light and nitrogen.Phytopathology 81:89–94.Google Scholar
  12. Gershenzon, J. 1994. Metabolic costs of terpenoid accumulation in higher plants.J. Chem. Ecol. 20:1281–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gijzen, M. Lewinsohn, E., andCroteau, R. 1991. Characterization of the constitutive and wound-inducible monoterpene cyclases.Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 289:267–273.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jorgenson, E. 1961. The formation of pinosylvin and its monomethyl ether in the sapwood ofPinus resinosa Ait.Can. J. Bot. 39:1765–1772.Google Scholar
  15. Julkunen-Tijto, R. 1985. Phenolic constituents in the leaves of northern willows: Methods for the analysis of certain phenolics.J. Agric. Food Chem. 33:213–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kelsey, R.G., andHarmon, M.E. 1989. Distribution and variation of extractable total phenols and tannins in the logs of four conifers after 1 year on the ground.Can. J. For. Res. 19:1030–1036.Google Scholar
  17. Klein, R.M., andPerkins, T.D. 1988. Primary and secondary causes and consequences of contemporary forest decline.Bot. Rev. 54:1–43.Google Scholar
  18. Klepzig, K.D. 1994. Interactions of stress, plant chemical defenses and subcortical insect-fungal complexes in red pine decline. PhD dissertation. University of Wisconsin-Madison. 246 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Klepzig, K.D., Raffa, K.F., andSmalley, E.B. 1991. Association of an insect-fungal complex with red pine decline in Wisconsin.For. Sci. 37:1119–1139.Google Scholar
  20. Lewinsohn, E., Gijzen, M., Savage, T.J., andCroteau, R. 1991a. Defense mechanisms of conifers: Relationships of monoterpene cyclase activity to anatomical specialization and oleoresin monoterpene content.Plant Physiol. 96:38–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lewinsohn, E., Guzen, M., andCroteau, R. 1991b. Defense mechanisms of conifers: Differences in constitutive and wound-induced monoterpene biosynthesis among species.Plant Physiol. 96:44–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lerdau, M., Litvak, M., andMonson, R. 1994. Plant chemical defense: Monoterpenes and the growth-differentiation balance hypothesis.Tree 9:58–61.Google Scholar
  23. Lieutier, F. 1993. Induced defense reaction of conifers to bark beetles and their associated Ophiostoma species, pp. 225–233,in M.J. Wingfield, K.A. Seifert, and J.F. Webber (eds.).Ceratocystis andOphiostoma: Taxonomy, Ecology, and Pathogenicity. A.P.S. Press, St. Paul, Minnesota.Google Scholar
  24. Lorio, P.L. 1986. Growth-differentiation balance: A basis for understanding southern pine beetle-tree interactions.For. Ecol. Manage. 14:259–273.Google Scholar
  25. Lorio, P.L., andHodges, J.D. 1968. Microsite effects on oleoresin pressure of large loblolly pines.Ecology 49:1207–1210.Google Scholar
  26. Manion, P.D. 1991. Tree Disease Concepts, 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 402 p.Google Scholar
  27. Nebeker, T.E., Hodges, J.D., andBlanche, C.A. 1993. Host response to bark beetle and pathogen colonization, pp. 225–233,in T.D. Schowalter, and G.M. Filip (eds.). Beetle-Pathogen Interactions in Conifer Forests. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Nevill, R.J., andAlexander, S.A. 1992. Transmission ofLeptographium procerum to eastern white pine byHylobius pales andPissodes nemorensis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).Plant Dis. 76:307–310.Google Scholar
  29. Oren, R., Schulze, E.-D. Werk, K.S., Meyer, J., Schneider, B.V., andHilmeis, H. 1988. Performance of twoPicea abies (L.) Karst. stands at different stages of decline: I. Carbon relations and stand growth.Oecologia 75:25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Paine, T.D., andStephen, F.M. 1987. Influence of tree stresses and site quality on the induced defensive system of loblolly pine.Can. J. For. Res. 17:569–571.Google Scholar
  31. Paine, T.D., Blanche, C.A., Nebeker, T.E., andStephen, F.M. 1987. Composition of loblolly pine resin defenses: Comparison of monoterpenes from induced lesion and sapwood resin.Can. J. For. Res. 17:1202–1206.Google Scholar
  32. Raffa, K.F., andBerryman, A.A. 1982. Accumulation of monoterpenes and associated volatiles following fungal inoculation of grand fir with a fungus vectored by the fir engraverScolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).Can. Entomol. 114:797–810.Google Scholar
  33. Raffa, K.F., andBerryman, A.A. 1983. Physiological aspects of lodgepole pine wound responses to a fungal symbiont of the mountain pine beetle,Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).Can. Entomol. 115:723–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Raffa, K.F., andHall, D.J. 1988. Seasonal activities of the pine root collar weevil,Hylobius radicis Buchanan (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), in red pine stands undergoing decline.Great Lakes Entomol. 21:69–74.Google Scholar
  35. Raffa, K.R., andKlepzig, K.D. 1995. Effects of root inhabiting insect-fungal complexes on aspects of host resistance to bark beetles,in W. Mattson and P. Niemela (eds.). Mechanisms of Woody Plant Defenses against Herbivores. USDA Forest Service, Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-, North Central Experiment Station. St. Paul, Minnesota.Google Scholar
  36. Raffa, K. R., andSmalley, E.B. 1995. Interaction of pre-attack and induced monoterpenes in conifer defense against bark beetle-fungal complexes.Oecologia. In press.Google Scholar
  37. Raffa K.F., andSteffeck, R.J. 1988. Computation of response factors for quantitative analysis of monoterpenes by gas-liquid chromatography.J. Chem. Ecol. 14:1385–1390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Raffa, K.F., Berryman, A.A., Simasko, J., Teal, W., andWong, B.L. 1985. Effects of grand fir monoterpenes on the fir engraver,Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), and its symbiotic fungus.Environ. Entomol. 14:552–556.Google Scholar
  39. Russell, C.E., andBerryman, A.A. 1976. Host resistance to the fir engraver beetle. 1. Monoterpene composition ofAbies grandis pitch blisters and fungus-infected wounds.Can. J. Bot. 54:14–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shain, L. 1967. Resistance of sapwood in stems of loblolly pine to infection byFomes annosus.Phytopathology 57:1034–1045.Google Scholar
  41. Shrimpton, D.M., andWhitney, H.S. 1968. Inhibition of growth of blue stain fungi by wood extractives.Can. J. Bot. 46:757–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith, R.H. 1963. Toxicity of pine resin vapors to three species ofDendroctonus bark beetles.J. Econ. Entomol. 56:827–831.Google Scholar
  43. Werner, R.A., andIllman, B.L. 1994. Response of Lutz, Sitka, and white spruce to attack byDendroctonus rufipennis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and blue stain fungi.Environ. Entomol. 23:472–478.Google Scholar
  44. Wright, E. 1933. A cork-borer method for inoculating trees.Phytopathology, 23:487–488.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kier D. Klepzig
    • 1
    • 3
  • Eric L. Kruger
    • 2
  • Eugene B. Smalley
    • 1
  • Kenneth F. Raffa
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Plant PathologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadison
  2. 2.Department of ForestryUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadison
  3. 3.Department of EntomologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadison

Personalised recommendations