Advertisement

Microbial Ecology

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 139–149 | Cite as

Distribution of chromobacteria in a lowland river

  • M. O. Moss
  • C. Ryall
Article

Abstract

A selective medium was used to estimate the numbers of purple pigmented bacteria in the River Wey. Chromobacteria were never isolated from the springs at the source of the river, but they appeared within a short distance and their numbers generally increased over the first 30 km. Counts were always low but were much higher during the winter than during the summer.

Records of water temperature and turbidity, as well as daily rainfall, were maintained during the sampling period. An unweighted multiple regression analysis of some of the results has shown that much of the variability in the counts of chromobacteria was correlated with turbidity (r=0.67,P<0.001). After turbidity was allowed for, a significant inverse correlation with temperature (r=0.60,P < 0.001) became apparent and these two factors together accounted for 64.7% of the variation in counts. Allowing for these two factors revealed a significant correlation with rainfall during the previous 4 days (r=0.27,P<0.05), and the three factors together accounted for 67.2% of the variability in counts.

In an attempt to discover the source of chromobacteria, samples of silt, soil, and storm overflow effluents were studied. In general, chromobacteria were present in highest numbers in soil or silt containing substantial quantities of organic material.

Keywords

Regression Analysis Water Temperature Silt Turbidity Sampling Period 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Caldarini, M.: Richerche sui batteri violacei delle acque. Ann. Ig. Sper.35, 765–784 (1925)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, M.: Ecological studies of bacteria in the water of Tuttle Creek reservoir. Diss. Abstr.29B, 1917 (1968)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Christensen, P. J., and F. D. Cook: The microbiology of Alberta muskeg. Can. J. Soil Sci.50, 171–178 (1970)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Collins, V. G.: The distribution and ecology of Gram-negative organisms other than Enterobacteriaceae in lakes. J. Appl. Bacteriol.23, 510–514 (1960)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Collins, V. G.: The distribution and ecology of bacteria in freshwater. Proc. Soc. Wat. Treat. Exam.12, 40–73 (1963)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Collins, V.G.: Recent studies of bacterial pathogens of freshwater fish. Proc. Soc. Wat. Treat. Exam.19, 3–31 (1970)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Ley, J., P. Segers, and M. Gillis: Intra- and intergeneric similarities ofChromobacterium andJanthinobacterium ribosomal ribonucleic acid cistrons. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.28, 154–168 (1978)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fred, E. B., F. C. Wilson, and A. Davenport: The distribution and significance of bacteria in Lake Mendota. Ecology5, 322 (1924)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gainey, P. L., and T. H. Lord: Microbiology of Water and Sewage. Prentice-Hall, New York (1952)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gray, E.: The ecology of the bacteria of Hobson's Brook, a Cambridgeshire chalk stream. J. Gen. Microbiol.5, 840–859 (1951)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hynes, H. B. N.: The Ecology of Running Water. Liverpool University Press, Liverpool (1970)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Keeble, J. R., and T. Cross: An improved medium for the enumeration ofChromobacterium in soil and water. J. Appl. Bacteriol.43, 325–327 (1977)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leopold, L. B.: Rivers. Am. Scient. 511 (1962)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Morris, M. B.: Some notes on the affinity between strains ofChromobacterium violaceum andChromobacterium ianthinum isolated from Trinidad soils. Trans. 5th Int. Congr. Soil Science, Leopoldville3, 107–112 (1954)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moss, M. O., C. Ryall, and N. A. Logan: The classification and characterisation of chromobacteria from a lowland river. J. Gen. Microbiol.105, 11–21 (1978)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rice, J. W.: A distribution study ofChromobacterium lividum. J. Bacteriol.36, 667–668 (1938)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ryall, C., and M. O. Moss: Selective media for the enumeration ofChromobacterium spp. in soil and water. J. Appl. Bacteriol.38, 53–59 (1975)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smith, K.: Water in Britain: a study in applied hydrology and resource geography. Macmillan Press Ltd., London (1972)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Taylor, C. B.: Bacteriology of freshwater. III. The types of bacteria present in lakes and streams and their relationship to the bacterial flora of soil. J. Hyg. Camb.42, 284–296 (1942)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. O. Moss
    • 1
  • C. Ryall
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MicrobiologyUniversity of SurreyGuildfordUK

Personalised recommendations